Jean Luc Bruhnel
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Tama Beth Kudman
|
Client |
3
|
3 | |
|
person
Jane Doe
|
Legal representative |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Jean Luc Bruhnel served with Subpoena | New York | View |
| 2010-11-03 | N/A | Date listed in document for a previously agreed deposition (likely a typo for 2009 given the fili... | Florida | View |
| 2010-11-03 | N/A | Scheduled deposition date (Note: Text says 2010, but context suggests typo for 2009 given filing ... | Florida | View |
| 2010-11-03 | N/A | Scheduled date for Bruhnel's deposition in Florida (Note: Text says 2010, likely typo for 2009 gi... | Florida | View |
| 2010-03-12 | N/A | Filing of Response by Jean Luc Bruhnel. | Southern District of Florida | View |
| 2010-03-12 | N/A | Filing of Response to Motion to Show Cause | Southern District of Florida | View |
| 2010-03-12 | N/A | Filing of Response to Plaintiff's Motion for an Order to Show Cause | Southern District of Florida | View |
| 2009-11-03 | N/A | Deposition of Jean Luc Bruhnel | Unspecified (Likely Fort La... | View |
014.pdf
This document is a legal response filed on March 12, 2010, by attorney Tama Beth Kudman on behalf of non-party witness Jean Luc Bruhnel (likely Jean-Luc Brunel) in the civil case Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein. Bruhnel opposes the plaintiff's motion to compel his deposition, arguing that he is a French citizen who has left the United States and cannot be legally compelled to return for testimony. The filing claims the plaintiff's motion is frivolous, notes that previous deposition dates were canceled by agreement, and suggests the plaintiff should use the Hague Convention to secure testimony abroad.
075.pdf
A legal response filed on March 12, 2010, by attorney Tama Beth Kudman on behalf of non-party Jean Luc Bruhnel (spelled 'Bruhnel' in document) in the case of Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein. The filing opposes a motion to compel Bruhnel's deposition, arguing that he is a French citizen who has left the U.S. with no plans to return and cannot be compelled to appear under Federal Rules. The document alleges misrepresentation and nonfeasance by the Plaintiff's counsel and suggests using the Hague Convention to secure testimony abroad.
027.pdf
Legal response filed on March 12, 2010, by attorney Tama Beth Kudman on behalf of non-party witness Jean Luc Bruhnel (spelled Bruhnel in document). The filing opposes Plaintiff Jane Doe's motion to compel Bruhnel to appear for a deposition, arguing that Bruhnel is a French citizen who has left the US with no plans to return and cannot be compelled by the Court to return. The document asserts that the Plaintiff should use the Hague Convention or other international mechanisms to secure testimony abroad and accuses Plaintiff's counsel of misrepresentation and failure to follow proper procedure.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012021.jpg
This document is an email dated September 18, 2009, from legal assistant Jacquie Johnson (working for Bradley Edwards at Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler) to Tama Kudman. The email serves to confirm the scheduling of a deposition for 'Mr. Bruhnel' (likely Jean-Luc Brunel) regarding the Epstein case, set for November 3rd at 10:00 a.m. The document is marked as 'Exhibit L' and contains a House Oversight Bates stamp.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity