| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013-02-08 | Legal case | Court case US v. Brinson, No. 13-CR-04-GKF, 2013 WL 11305792. | N.D. Okla. | View |
This document is page 3 of a legal filing (Document 24) from July 16, 2019, addressed to Judge Richard M. Berman in the case of United States v. Jeffrey Epstein (Case 1:19-cr-00490). The text argues for the defendant's right to bail, contending that denying bail based on wealth violates the Fifth, Sixth, Eighth, and Fourteenth Amendments. It cites specific case law (Brinson, Afyare, Gardner) to argue that the presumption against release in ยง 1591 prosecutions is rebuttable.
This document is page 3 of a legal filing addressed to Judge Richard M. Berman, dated July 16, 2019. The author argues that denying bail to a defendant based on their wealth is unconstitutional, violating the Fifth, Sixth, Eighth, and Fourteenth Amendments by thwarting the presumption of innocence and due process. The document cites several federal court cases as precedent to support the claim that suitable conditions for release can be found even in presumption cases.
This document is a page from a MySpace profile for the user 'dixiedelight5', dated February 9, 2006. It displays photos of individuals named Kailey, Brinson, and Sarah, along with a section of 'Friends Comments'. The comments, from users Sarah, michael, and JOY BOY in early February 2006, consist of casual social interactions, including plans to meet up and friendly greetings between neighbors.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity