| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
MR. EPSTEIN
|
Employee |
6
|
2 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Crime | Individual II and two other employees allegedly facilitated the defendant’s trafficking of minors... | Manhattan and Palm Beach, F... | View |
| 2018-12-03 | Payment | Mr. Epstein made payments totaling $350,000 to Individual I and Individual II very soon after the... | N/A | View |
| 2018-11-28 | Payment | Between Nov 28 and Dec 3, 2018, Mr. Epstein paid $100,000 to a company run by Individual I and $2... | N/A | View |
This legal document outlines the U.S. Government's argument that Jeffrey Epstein attempted to influence potential witnesses after a critical Miami Herald report was published in late 2018. The government alleges Epstein paid a total of $350,000 to two 'potential co-conspirators,' identified as Individual I and Individual II, for whom he had previously secured protection in his 2007 Florida Non-Prosecution Agreement. Individual II is specifically described as an employee who facilitated Epstein's sex trafficking of minors.
This legal document, filed by the Government on July 18, 2019, alleges that Jeffrey Epstein attempted to tamper with witnesses. The Government contends that shortly after the Miami Herald published an exposé on his 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement, Epstein paid $100,000 and $250,000 respectively to 'Individual I' and 'Individual II', both described as potential co-conspirators who allegedly facilitated his crimes. The payments are presented as evidence of an attempt to influence potential witnesses in his ongoing case.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity