new mexico
LocationRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Accuser 2
|
Location of incident |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Annie
|
Location of conduct |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
JANE
|
Travel incident location |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Travel logistics |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Location of alleged conduct |
1
|
1 |
Jeffrey Epstein Part 18 of 18.PDF
This document is a collection of FBI and Palm Beach Police investigative materials regarding Jeffrey Epstein (File 31E-MM-108062). It includes FD-340 evidence logs, handwritten notes from interviews with victims or witnesses detailing interactions with Epstein (including massages, nudity, payments, and travel to New Mexico), subpoenas for subscriber information, MapQuest directions to 505 S Flagler Dr, and MySpace profile printouts. The handwritten notes contain significant allegations regarding Epstein's behavior, including asking for massages, comments about age ('I know you're not 18'), and controlling travel arrangements.
Epstein_Part_17_(Redacted).pdf
This document contains several newspaper clippings from The Palm Beach Post in late July and early August 2006, detailing Jeffrey Epstein's arrest and indictment for soliciting prostitution. The articles cover his booking, release on bond, his attorney Jack Goldberger's claims of a 'distorted view' from police, and background information on Epstein's properties, social connections, and past legal troubles. The clippings also mention the involvement of State Attorney Barry Krischer and Palm Beach Police Chief Michael Reiter in the case.
Epstein_Part_18.pdf
This document is a compilation of FBI and police files related to the Jeffrey Epstein investigation, ranging from 2005 to 2008. It includes handwritten notes from victim interviews detailing interactions with Epstein involving money, travel, and massages, as well as official subpoenas for telecommunications data and MySpace profile printouts. The file also contains evidence receipts and deleted page information sheets indicating a significant portion of the record is withheld.
036.pdf
This document is a transcript of a bail hearing for Jeffrey Epstein held on July 15, 2019, in the SDNY. The government argued for detention based on flight risk (citing wealth, foreign ties, and a fake passport found in a safe) and danger to the community, while the defense argued for release on house arrest, citing his 14-year record of appearing for court and lack of recent convictions. Two victims, Annie Farmer and Courtney Wild, spoke in court opposing bail.
032.pdf
This document is a Decision & Order by U.S. District Judge Richard M. Berman denying Jeffrey Epstein's request for pretrial release and granting the Government's motion for remand (detention). The Court concludes that the Government has shown by clear and convincing evidence that Epstein poses a danger to the community, citing testimony from victims and evidence of potential witness tampering and non-compliance with sex offender registration. Additionally, the Court finds by a preponderance of the evidence that Epstein is a flight risk due to his vast wealth, international ties, and the potential for a lengthy prison sentence, and determines that the defense's proposed bail package is inadequate to mitigate these risks.
025.pdf
This document is a cover letter filed on July 17, 2019, by attorney Reid Weingarten of Steptoe & Johnson LLP to Judge Richard M. Berman regarding the case United States v. Jeffrey Epstein. The letter submits attached documents concerning Epstein's New Mexico registration status to support his bail application, following up on a previous letter dated July 16, 2019. The filing also lists Martin G. Weinberg and Marc Allan Fernich as additional counsel.
025-02.pdf
This document (Exhibit B) contains a series of emails from Jeffrey Epstein to Detective Deborah Anaya, with attorney Darren Indyke copied. The emails, dating from 2012 to 2015, serve as notifications of Epstein's travel to and from New Mexico (Santa Fe and his ranch), likely to comply with sex offender registration requirements (explicitly referenced in one subject line as 'sex regi'). Epstein repeatedly uses the phrase 'out of an abundance of caution' when reporting his presence in the state.
024.pdf
Defense counsel Marc Fernich writes to Judge Berman to supplement Jeffrey Epstein's bail request, arguing against the government's stance that Epstein's wealth creates an irrebuttable presumption for detention. The letter proposes a forensic accounting by Joel Podgor, notes that Epstein's brother Mark is willing to secure a bond with his >$100 million net worth, clarifies Epstein's sex offender registration status in New Mexico, defends against claims regarding an expired Austrian passport, and argues that Epstein's return to the US despite media pressure proves he is not a flight risk.
022.pdf
Defense counsel Marc Fernich writes to Judge Berman to supplement Jeffrey Epstein's bail request, arguing that the government is incorrectly using Epstein's wealth to create an irrebuttable presumption of detention. The letter highlights that Epstein's brother, Mark, is willing to pledge his >$100 million net worth to secure bond, disputes the government's characterization of an expired Austrian passport, and clarifies Epstein's sex offender registration status in New Mexico. The defense also argues that Epstein did not flee despite intense media pressure in late 2018 and offers a forensic accounting of his finances.
20250117133905126_22-1426.pdf
This document is a formal legal opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirming the conviction and 240-month prison sentence of Ghislaine Maxwell for sex trafficking and related offenses. The court rejected Maxwell's appeal on five grounds, including arguments regarding a non-prosecution agreement, statute of limitations, juror misconduct, jury instructions, and sentencing reasonableness. The document also includes a subsequent order from November 2024 denying Maxwell's petition for panel rehearing or rehearing en banc.
2020.03.12%20Civil%20Complaint.pdf
This document is a civil complaint filed on March 12, 2020, by Ghislaine Maxwell against the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein and its executors, Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn, as well as NES, LLC. Maxwell seeks indemnification for legal fees, security costs, and safe accommodation expenses she has incurred due to her prior employment with Epstein. The complaint alleges that Epstein repeatedly promised, both verbally and in writing (specifically in a 2004 letter), to support Maxwell financially and indemnify her, a practice he reportedly maintained during previous lawsuits in 2009 and 2017.
2022.03.04%20Motion%20-%20Motion.pdf
This document is a Motion for Award of Attorneys' Fees filed by the Co-Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein in the Superior Court of the Virgin Islands. The Co-Executors are requesting $112,216.90 in fees incurred while successfully defending against the Government of the Virgin Islands' (GVI) attempts to intervene in the probate action and freeze estate assets. The document details the history of the GVI's failed motions, the complex nature of the estate, the funding of the Victims' Compensation Program ($121 million+), and justifies the legal fees based on the attorneys' experience and standard rates.
017-12.pdf
This document is an appeal by Defendant Jeffrey Epstein against a Magistrate's Order compelling him to produce discovery materials, including correspondence with prosecutors, tax returns, and passport/travel records. Epstein argues that producing these documents violates his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination because he still faces a real threat of federal prosecution outside the Southern District of Florida, despite his Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). The filing also details privacy concerns for third parties (alleged victims), claims attorney work-product privilege over files selected by his defense counsel, and argues that his offer to stipulate to a high net worth renders the production of his tax returns unnecessary.
008.pdf
This document contains a Motion for Protective Order filed by Igor Zinoview and Jeffrey Epstein to limit the scope of depositions in a civil case. Zinoview asserts via affidavit that he only began working for Epstein in November 2005, after the alleged events, and thus has no relevant knowledge. The filing also includes excerpts from the depositions of Epstein's pilots, Larry Visoski and Larry Eugene Morrison, where they are questioned about their personal beliefs regarding the sexual abuse allegations and whether they would trust Epstein with their own daughters. Flight logs and passenger manifests are referenced in the deposition indexes ('PLAINTIFF'S EX. 1 FLIGHT LOG BOOK' and 'JEGE, Inc., Passenger Manifest') but the actual log content is not present in these specific pages.
044.pdf
This document is a legal filing from May 2020 in the case of Teresa Helm v. The Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. It contains a letter from the Plaintiff's counsel arguing that the Estate Executors are obstructing discovery by limiting it to a narrow time window in 2002 and refusing to answer questions fully. The attached Exhibit A contains the Defendants' supplemental responses to interrogatories, in which they identify specific staff members (including Ghislaine Maxwell, Sarah Kellen, and Lesley Groff) who worked at Epstein's New York home during late 2002, list various email accounts and phone numbers associated with Epstein, and identify Shoppers Travel, Inc. as his travel agency. No specific flight logs or aircraft manifests are included in the document.
001.pdf
This document is a legal complaint filed by Teresa Helm against the executors of Jeffrey Epstein's estate, Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn, alleging sexual abuse and trafficking by Epstein and his co-conspirators. The complaint details Epstein's extensive sex trafficking network, previous legal proceedings, and his personal statements regarding his actions, seeking damages for battery and intentional infliction of emotional distress.
026.pdf
This document is the formal Answer and Affirmative Defenses filed by the Co-Executors of the Jeffrey Epstein Estate (Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn) in response to a civil complaint by Annie Farmer. The executors generally deny knowledge of the specific allegations of abuse but admit to certain procedural facts, such as Epstein's arrest date (July 6, 2019), death date (August 10, 2019), and property ownership in NY, NM, USVI, FL, and France. They assert ten affirmative defenses, including failure to state a claim, contributory negligence, assumption of risk, and statute of limitations arguments challenging the New York Child Victims' Act.
022.pdf
This is an amended complaint filed by Maria Farmer against the executors of Jeffrey Edward Epstein's estate. Farmer alleges that Epstein sexually assaulted and trafficked her, and that his actions were part of a larger sex trafficking network. The complaint details Epstein's history of sexual abuse, his lenient 2008 plea deal, and the intimidation tactics used to silence victims.
001-01.pdf
This document contains the deposition transcript of 'Jane Doe' (a minor victim) dated February 20, 2008, and a Civil Complaint filed by her mother against Jeffrey Epstein, Haley Robson, and Sarah Kellen. The deposition covers Jane Doe's family issues, credibility, drug use allegations, and interactions with law enforcement, while the Complaint details the 'scheme' wherein Robson recruited underage girls for Epstein to sexually abuse under the guise of massages. The document also includes procedural filings regarding service of process on Haley Robson.
053.pdf
This document is a legal filing in the civil case Jane Doe 1000 v. Indyke & Kahn. It includes a letter from Plaintiff's counsel arguing that the Epstein Estate executors are improperly limiting discovery to a 4-year period and refusing to produce documents regarding Epstein's broader sex-trafficking conspiracy. Attached as Exhibit A are the Defendants' supplemental responses to interrogatories, which list specific employees (including Ghislaine Maxwell, Sarah Kellen, and pilots like Larry Visoski), email accounts used by Epstein (specifically noting 'jeevacation@gmail.com' and 'jeeproject@yahoo.com'), and numerous phone numbers associated with his properties in New York, Palm Beach, New Mexico, and the Virgin Islands.
046.pdf
This document is a legal filing from Plaintiff Jane Doe 1000's counsel requesting a pre-motion conference to compel Defendants (Epstein's executors Indyke and Kahn) to produce discovery documents and answer interrogatories. The filing includes exhibits of the discovery requests, which seek detailed information on Epstein's flight logs, financial transactions, communications with high-profile individuals (Prince Andrew, Bill Clinton, Alan Dershowitz), and the structure of his alleged sex-trafficking operation. The Defendants have objected to almost all requests, claiming they are overbroad or that they lack knowledge because Epstein is deceased, prompting the Plaintiff to seek court intervention. Note: While flight logs are requested, no actual flight data is contained in this document.
035.pdf
Legal correspondence from Plaintiff's attorney Daniel Mullkoff to Judge Debra Freeman regarding the case Davies v. Indyke et al. The letter argues that the Defendants improperly raised a new argument concerning the New Mexico statute of limitations for the first time in a reply brief and contends that the Plaintiff's claims regarding sexual abuse by Jeffrey Epstein in New Mexico are timely under the discovery rule.
016.pdf
This document is a letter from attorney Bennet J. Moskowitz of Troutman Sanders LLP to Judge Gregory H. Woods, dated January 21, 2020. It outlines the grounds for an anticipated motion to dismiss claims brought by plaintiff Teala Davies against the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. The defense argues that Davies' claims of sexual assault (alleged to have occurred between 2002 and 2004 in FL, NM, NY, USVI, and France) are time-barred by applicable statutes of limitations and that punitive damages cannot be recovered from a deceased tortfeasor's estate.
024.pdf
This is a Memorandum of Law filed by the defendants (Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein) in support of their motion to dismiss the plaintiff's complaint. The defendants argue that the plaintiff's claims of sexual assault and battery are time-barred by the applicable statutes of limitations in multiple jurisdictions (USVI, NY, NM, FL, France) and that exceptions like CPLR 215(8)(a) or equitable tolling do not apply. Additionally, the defendants argue that punitive damages are not recoverable against a deceased tortfeasor's estate under the laws of any relevant jurisdiction.
012.pdf
This document is a letter from Bennet J. Moskowitz of Troutman Sanders LLP to Judge Andrew L. Carter Jr., dated January 24, 2020. It serves as a pre-motion letter outlining the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein's intent to move for dismissal of a lawsuit filed by Juliette Bryant. The Estate argues that Bryant's claims regarding alleged sexual abuse between 2002 and 2004 are time-barred by the statutes of limitations in New York, USVI, Florida, and New Mexico, and that she cannot rely on the Child Victims Act or tolling because she was an adult (age 20-22) at the time of the alleged incidents. Additionally, the letter argues that punitive damages cannot be recovered from a decedent's estate under the relevant laws.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity