This document contains a forensic log of digital messages exchanged on February 17, 2017, between 'e:jeeitunes@gmail.com' (an alias associated with Jeffrey Epstein) and a redacted individual. The conversation is brief and functional, involving the coordination of a time to speak, with the redacted individual asking if the other party is 'Free?' and mentioning they have 'another call in 15 minutes.' The document originates from a House Oversight investigation.
This document is a forensic log of text messages from January 28, 2017, between 'e:jeeitunes@gmail.com' (an alias associated with Jeffrey Epstein) and a redacted individual. The conversation mistakenly references C. Everett Koop before correcting the subject to 'bill,' likely referring to a high-profile individual (often speculated to be Bill Gates in this context). The redacted sender describes a meeting with 'bill' where a 'henchman team' waited outside while they spent hours working on a whiteboard.
This document is a forensic extraction of a message log dated January 27, 2017, stamped by the House Oversight Committee. It details a conversation between Jeffrey Epstein (using the alias email jeeitunes@gmail.com) and a redacted individual discussing 'Bannon' and 'Barrack' as 'puppet masters.' The conversation also references an unidentified male who wishes to speak with Epstein but is prevented from doing so by his wife.
This document contains a forensic extraction log of electronic messages dated January 20, 2017. The log records a message sent from 'e:jeeitunes@gmail.com' stating 'Great smell,' followed by a second message segment stating 'Then it should last a year , but I'll smell like john.' The document includes metadata such as GUIDs, timestamps, and read status flags, and bears the Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027132.
This document is a digital forensic log from the House Oversight Committee containing a series of messages exchanged on January 20, 2017. One message is sent from 'e:jeeitunes@gmail.com' (an address associated with Jeffrey Epstein), discussing an individual named 'Woody' wanting Chinese food. Subsequent messages from redacted senders discuss social dynamics, specifically that Woody was unaware that 'Liz' was 'James' wife,' and one participant complains about 'recuperating' from what they were subjected to.
This document is the final page or footer of an email correspondence. It contains a sign-off from an individual named 'Lena' offering further assistance. The majority of the text is a legal disclaimer asserting that the communication is confidential, may contain inside information, and is the specific property of Jeffrey Epstein. It directs recipients to contact 'jeevacation@gmail.com' if the email was received in error. The document bears a House Oversight Bates stamp.
This document contains the footer fragments of an email chain. It features a repeating confidentiality disclaimer asserting that the information is the property of Jeffrey Epstein and directs inquiries to 'jecvacation@gmail.com'. It also includes the signature block of Elisa New, a Professor of American Literature at Harvard University, appearing twice. The document bears the Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027039.
This document is page 5 of a House Oversight production (ID 022201). It consists entirely of a standard legal disclaimer and confidentiality notice, likely appended to the bottom of an email. It identifies the information as the property of 'JEE' (presumably Jeffrey E. Epstein) and lists the contact email 'jeevacation@gmail.com' for reporting transmission errors.
An email thread from January 9, 2015, between Jeffrey Epstein (using 'jeevacation') and an unidentified pilot/associate. They are collaborating on a drafted response to public allegations, with the recipient suggesting fewer 'personal attacks.' The conversation includes flirtatious banter, with the recipient joking about preferring the role of 'sex slave' to 'copilot.'
An email chain from January 2015 involving an account associated with JEE (Jeffrey Epstein) and a redacted individual. The redacted individual shares that they will not speak to reporters and details how the 'Slovakian press' contacted their friend under the guise of writing a story about 'notable people from the east'. The top sender replies simply with 'notable?', seemingly questioning the reporter's phrasing.
An email thread from September 2017 between Jeffrey Epstein and a redacted individual discussing high-level geopolitical events in the Gulf, specifically the Qatar diplomatic crisis involving Tamim bin Hamad Al Thani (Tamem) and Mohammed bin Salman (MBS). The correspondent mentions Donald Trump's involvement and potential motives. The thread also coordinates a meeting in New York and mentions an associate named Larson and the exchange of 'Kuwaiti gifts'.
This document contains the footer and legal disclaimer of an email sent by 'JEE' (presumably Jeffrey Epstein) using the address 'jeevacation@gmail.com'. The email includes an attachment titled '<katie johnson v trump complaint.pdf>', referring to a legal complaint involving Katie Johnson and Donald Trump. The document bears a House Oversight Committee production stamp.
This page contains a standard legal confidentiality disclaimer, likely from the footer of an email. It identifies the email address 'jeevacation@gmail.com' as the point of contact for erroneous transmissions. The document bears a Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028963', indicating it was produced as part of a House Oversight Committee investigation.
This document page consists of repeated legal disclaimers from the end of an email chain. The text identifies the communication as the property of 'JEE' (Jeffrey E. Epstein) and directs inquiries to the email address 'jeevacation@gmail.com'. It warns that the content may contain attorney-client privileged or inside information.
This email chain from January 4, 2014, details a request for assistance from Kelly Friendly, an employee of Larry Summers, to Jeffrey Epstein. Stranded in St. Thomas, Friendly asks for help, and Epstein arranges for her and her 11-year-old daughter to fly to New York on his friend Andrew Farkas's private plane. Epstein also places his cars and drivers at their disposal.
This document appears to be a page from a larger production (Bates stamped HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023446) consisting entirely of repeated email confidentiality disclaimers. The text asserts that the communication is the property of 'JEE' (Jeffrey Epstein) and provides 'jeevacation@gmail.com' as the contact address for reporting unauthorized receipt. The document warns of attorney-client privilege and strictly prohibits unauthorized use.
This page contains repeated legal disclaimers presumably found at the bottom of an email chain. The text asserts that the communication is confidential, potentially attorney-client privileged, and the property of 'JEE'. It directs anyone receiving the message in error to contact 'jeevacation@gmail.com'.
This document appears to be the footer page of an email chain containing standard legal disclaimers regarding confidentiality and attorney-client privilege. It identifies the communication as the property of 'JEE' (Jeffrey Epstein) and directs recipients to contact 'jeevacation@gmail.com' if received in error. The document bears the Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023434.
This document contains a 2018 email thread mentioning Jeffrey Epstein's presence in Paris and travel difficulties due to an Air France strike. Crucially, it includes a forwarded email from November 15, 2016 (just after the US election), in which Epstein writes a scathing message to 'Leon' (likely Leon Black). In this message, Epstein criticizes Leon's staff (specifically Brad Wechsler and Joshn Castrucci), discusses a 'foreign funds repatriation plan' potentially affected by 'Donald' (Trump), and claims to have personally paid to augment an employee's salary.
This document appears to be the footer section of an email chain containing a signature block for Elisa New, a Professor at Harvard University. It includes repeated confidentiality disclaimers stating the communication is the 'property of JEE' (Jeffrey Epstein) and directing inquiries to the email address 'jeevacation@gmail.com'. The document bears a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp.
This document appears to be a page from an email chain (Bates stamped HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023204) containing legal disclaimers and a signature block. It lists Elisa New, a Professor at Harvard University, and includes a repeated confidentiality notice stating the communication is the property of 'JEE' (Jeffrey Epstein) and directing errors to 'jeevacation@gmail.com'.
This document is a standard confidentiality disclaimer and footer, likely from the bottom of an email. It asserts that the communication is the property of Jeffrey Epstein and provides the email address 'jeevacation@gmail.com' for reporting errors. The document bears the Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023066.
This document is an email chain originating in March 2011 and forwarded by Jeffrey Epstein to Darren Indyke in April 2019. The original 2011 correspondence involves a journalist from The Mail on Sunday, Annette Witheridge, contacting Brett Jaffe regarding an upcoming story about Maxwell, Epstein, and Prince Andrew. The chain shows the legal coordination between Mark Cohen, Ghislaine Maxwell, and Jeffrey Epstein to ignore the press inquiry, as well as a privileged communication sent to Alan Dershowitz.
This document is an email chain from March 4, 2011, involving Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, Mark Cohen, and 'The Duke' (widely believed to be Prince Andrew). The chain begins with a legal/media inquiry regarding Maxwell, which Mark Cohen forwards to Maxwell seeking direction. The chain is forwarded to Epstein, then to 'The Duke,' who responds to Maxwell with significant distress, denying knowledge or involvement ('This has NOTHING to do with me'). Maxwell then loops this response back to Epstein.
This document is an email chain from March 4, 2011, initiated by a media inquiry from the Mail on Sunday regarding an upcoming story about Ghislaine Maxwell, Jeffrey Epstein, and Prince Andrew. The inquiry was forwarded up a chain: from Brett Jaffe to Mark Cohen, to Ghislaine Maxwell, to Jeffrey Epstein, and finally to 'The Duke' (Prince Andrew). The Duke replies to Epstein expressing confusion ('I don't know any of this') and asking how Epstein intends to respond.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity