| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
DOJ (Department of Justice)
|
Adversarial conflict of interest |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Government spending on early AI efforts that 'basically just didn't work'. | Unknown | View |
This document presents two slides analyzing US entitlement spending trends, highlighting that many programs like Medicaid and Medicare lack sufficient dedicated funding compared to Social Security. It provides statistical data showing that annual entitlement spending doubled over a 15-year period (F1995-F2010), reaching approximately $16,600 per household per year.
This document appears to be a page from a larger file (likely House Oversight material related to the Epstein investigation) containing an excerpt of an interview or memoir by a man named George. He recounts working on a secret government project (Project Horizon) with Wernher von Braun in Huntsville, Alabama, involving a proposed lunar base. The text details the secrecy required, including misleading his wife about his whereabouts, and cites Wikipedia regarding the project's projected $6 billion cost.
This document is a scanned book chapter titled 'Jeffrey Epstein: 1984' (Chapter 26), stamped with 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT'. The text discusses Epstein's early business model, noting that while he hinted at government ties and dangerous work, he primarily focused on tax avoidance schemes for the rich. The text details a specific legal dispute starting in 1982 where Michael Stroll invested $450,000 with Epstein, subsequently suing him in 1984 for $440,000; the text implies Epstein claimed the money was payment for a horse.
This document contains an excerpt from an interview where a speaker, identified as Siegel, discusses the concepts of Western guilt, appeasement, and the "Control Factor" in relation to radical Islam. Siegel argues that Western societies often blame themselves for terrorism in a misguided attempt to feel in control, referencing political figures and events like the Fort Hood shooting to illustrate the dangers of ignoring Islamist ideology.
This document is a transcript of a legal testimony where an unidentified witness is questioned about their knowledge of matters related to Jeffrey Epstein. The witness denies meeting several named agents, including FBI agent Nesbit Kirkendall, and denies ever discussing being reimbursed by Epstein. They also deny any knowledge of an alleged promise by the government to provide money to girls at the end of a criminal prosecution.
This document is a Department of Justice (DOJ) analysis and opposition to Section 214 of a proposed bill concerning trafficking victims, likely from around 2008. The DOJ argues the bill's grant authorizations are redundant, create conflicts of interest with NGOs, improperly involve the Department of State in domestic issues, and wrongly extend victim benefits to prostitutes under the Mann Act who do not meet the legal definition of a victim unless under 18.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity