| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
George Papadopoulos
|
Source of information |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
George Papadopoulos
|
Informant target |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
George Papadopoulos
|
Acquaintance |
6
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | George Papadopoulos was taken to dinner where he bragged about hearing of Russian dirt on Clinton. | London | View |
| N/A | N/A | Dinner where Papadopoulos allegedly bragged about dirt on Clinton. | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Dinner meeting in London where Papadopoulos was allegedly entrapped | London | View |
This document appears to be a page from a House Oversight Committee report (likely Republican-authored) criticizing the origins of the FBI's 'Crossfire Hurricane' investigation. It argues that the investigation into the Trump campaign was based on flimsy evidence, specifically attacking the credibility of the George Papadopoulos entrapment theory and the Steele Dossier, while contrasting this with alleged financial ties between the Clintons and Russian interests. The text details specific dates in August 2016 regarding letters sent to FBI Director Comey by Democrats pushing the collusion narrative.
This document appears to be a page from a House Oversight Committee report criticizing the FBI's 'Crossfire Hurricane' investigation into the Trump campaign's alleged ties to Russia. It argues that the investigation was based on flimsy evidence (specifically concerning George Papadopoulos and the Steele Dossier) and was driven by political bias, highlighting leaks to the media by officials and letters from Senator Harry Reid in late 2016. The text does not mention Jeffrey Epstein or Ghislaine Maxwell; it is focused entirely on the 2016 election and the Russia investigation.
This document, stamped with a House Oversight footer, argues against the legitimacy of the 'Crossfire Hurricane' investigation into the Trump campaign. It contends that the investigation violated Justice Department norms regarding election-year impartiality and asserts there was no evidence of collusion when the probe began. The text contrasts the scrutiny of the Trump campaign with the activities of the Clinton campaign (funding the Steele dossier) and the Podesta Group's ties to Russian entities.
This document, an excerpt from a House Oversight report, argues against the narrative of Trump-Russia collusion, citing a lack of evidence and suggesting political bias in the FBI's 'Crossfire' investigation. It details pre-election efforts by figures like Harry Reid and media outlets to publicize the collusion story through letters to the FBI and reporting on the Steele dossier. The document is about the 2016 US presidential election and is not related to Jeffrey Epstein.
This document, a page from a House Oversight report, argues that the 'Crossfire' investigation into Trump-Russia collusion was a politically motivated counterintelligence probe lacking discernible evidence at its launch. It contrasts this with actions by the Clinton campaign and associated groups, such as funding the Steele Dossier and lobbying for Kremlin-tied entities, suggesting a double standard in how Russian connections were treated. The author posits that the case against Trump campaign associate George Papadopoulos was a form of entrapment and that no real evidence of collusion has emerged.
Papadopoulos drunkenly bragged at dinner that he'd heard about such dirt but never seen it. Downer later admitted Papadopoulos never mentioned emails.
Papadopoulos drunkenly bragged at dinner that he'd heard about such dirt but never seen it. Downer later admitted Papadopoulos never mentioned emails.
Drunken bragging about hearing of dirt but never seeing it.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity