| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Rejection of MAPS publication | Federal Prison | View |
This document is a page from a law review article (103 Minn. L. Rev.) discussing mechanisms of prosecutorial accountability and the impact of resource constraints on charging decisions. It details three models for checking underenforcement: private prosecution authority, independent review of non-prosecution, and multiple public prosecution agencies, noting the U.S. preference for the third model. The page also includes extensive footnotes citing various legal scholars, articles, and cases related to prosecution failures and police bias.
This document, stamped by the House Oversight Committee, outlines strict mail censorship policies within a federal institution. It details the rejection of magazines like 'High Times' and 'Maxim' for security reasons and describes the punishment of peace activist William Combs, who spent eight days in solitary confinement for sharing mainstream political commentary from authors like Bill Moyers and 'Reader's Digest' that criticized government policy.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity