| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Martin A. Schmidt
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Commonwealth
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 |
This is page 57 of a legal filing (Document 310-1) from the Ghislaine Maxwell case (1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on July 2, 2021. The text presents legal arguments citing various precedents (including Martinez, Carrillo, and Baird) to establish that non-prosecution agreements should be treated as binding contracts similar to plea agreements. This argument is likely being used to support the defense's claim regarding the applicability of the 2007 Epstein non-prosecution agreement.
This document is page 55 of 80 from a legal filing (Document 310-1) in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on July 2, 2021. The text is an excerpt from a legal opinion citing the precedent of *Commonwealth v. Zuber*, discussing the legal obligation of prosecutors to honor promises made during plea bargaining. This is likely included in a defense motion arguing for the enforcement of a non-prosecution agreement (likely the Epstein NPA) based on the principle of 'benefit of the bargain.'
This document contains the conclusion of a memo from MIT administrators Martin A. Schmidt and Maria T. Zuber regarding proposed federal cuts to indirect cost recovery for research grants. They warn that a cap on these costs would severely impact MIT's ability to maintain research infrastructure, potentially leading to layoffs, salary freezes, or facility deterioration. The document specifically references a proposed 22% cut to the NIH budget (likely circa 2017) and is part of a document production for the House Oversight Committee investigation (likely regarding MIT's financial ties to Jeffrey Epstein, though Epstein is not named on this specific page).
Joichi Ito forwards an email to Jeffrey Epstein containing a formal memo from MIT administrators Martin Schmidt and Maria Zuber. The memo warns the MIT research community about the financial dangers of a Trump Administration proposal to cap indirect cost reimbursements for federal research grants at 10%, potentially costing the university $100 million annually.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity