California
LocationRelationship Network
EFTA00029444.pdf
This document is an email chain from February to April 2020 between the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) and technical/forensic teams regarding the processing of evidence seized from Jeffrey Epstein's properties. Key issues discussed include technical difficulties linking emails to attachments (using 'flight records' as a hypothetical example), the large volume of data (over 1 million documents), and the inventory of devices seized from the NY Mansion and Virgin Islands. The emails also reveal that 9 hard drives found in the NY apartment were actually copies of drives seized during a previous 2007 search.
EFTA00029197.pdf
An email from a civil trial attorney in Beverly Hills to an investigator (likely FBI) regarding a former client. The attorney notes the investigator visited the client's apartment and asserts that the client is 'definitely a victim' in the Epstein matter. The attorney inquires if the client is a target of any ongoing investigation and offers cooperation pending a meeting.
EFTA00020508.pdf
An FBI intake report from October 2020 detailing a call from a confidential source who attended a party at Jeffrey Epstein's Palm Beach home around Christmas 2000. The source attended with Lisa Villeneuve (aka Ghislaine Lisa Villeneuve) and Bobby Cox, and believes Ghislaine Maxwell was the hostess. The source describes an encounter with Curt Schmidt (CEO of Blue Buffalo) involving questions about sex/cocaine, and mentions an invitation to a party at Donald Trump's Mar-a-Lago, which Villeneuve described as being 'for prostitutes.'
EFTA00020213.pdf
This document is a chain of emails between the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) and the FBI's Computer Analysis Response Team (CART) spanning February to June 2020. The correspondence details the logistical and technical challenges of processing approximately 40-50 TB of digital evidence seized from Jeffrey Epstein's New York mansion and Virgin Islands property. Key issues include the compatibility of forensic data with the 'Relativity' e-discovery platform, delays caused by FBI network upgrades and COVID-19 staffing reductions, and the inventorying of specific devices including servers, laptops, and hard drives.
EFTA00013961.pdf
This document is an email chain dated July 30, 2008, between an Assistant U.S. Attorney (USAFLS) and Roy Black, Jeffrey Epstein's attorney. The correspondence concerns scheduling a phone call to discuss the 'performance of the criminal Non-Prosecution Agreement' related to Epstein. Roy Black indicates he is traveling in California during the exchange.
EFTA00010105.pdf
This document is a letter motion dated November 18, 2021, from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The Government requests a ruling that the birth certificates of Minor Victims 1, 2, 4, 5, and 6 be deemed self-authenticating under Federal Rules of Evidence 902 and 902(4), thereby avoiding the need to call records custodians from various states (RI, MO, NY, CA, MA) to testify at trial. The defense had refused to stipulate to the authenticity of these records despite having no reason to doubt them.
DOJ-OGR-00008842.tif
This document is a legal correspondence or motion from Matthew A. Leish, an attorney for Daily News, L.P., requesting the unsealing of documents related to Ms. Maxwell's effort to obtain a new trial. It cites several legal precedents regarding public access to court documents, particularly in post-conviction proceedings and cases involving juror misconduct, arguing for transparency due to the strong presumption of openness and the public interest.
DOJ-OGR-00018069.jpg
This document is a transcript from a legal proceeding filed on August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Alessi. The questioner attempts to determine the origin of a piece of evidence, "Exhibit 52," and its accompanying Post-It notes, suggesting locations such as New York, Palm Beach, and California. Alessi consistently denies having any personal knowledge about where the exhibit or the notes were created or came from.
DOJ-OGR-00001521.jpg
This legal document, filed on July 6, 2020, is a court order concerning the initial appearance and removal hearing for defendant Ghislaine Maxwell. The court justifies holding the hearing via video, citing COVID-19 related standing orders, and finds that this method constitutes a partial, rather than total, closure of proceedings. The court concludes that public and press access is maintained, satisfying the constitutional rights of the defendant and the public.
DOJ-OGR-00000702.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated September 3, 2019, in a case involving Jeffrey Epstein. Attorney Teri Gibbs appears on behalf of attorney Lisa Bloom to read victim impact statements into the record, including a powerful statement from "Jane Doe 6" addressed to Judge Richard M. Berman. The statement describes the lasting harm caused by Epstein and asserts the author's identity as a survivor, not a victim.
DOJ-OGR-00000288.jpg
This document is the concluding section of a legal filing on behalf of Mr. Epstein, arguing for his pretrial release. The argument centers on the Sixth Amendment, stating that pretrial detention would materially impair his constitutional right to participate in his own defense, especially given the case involves voluminous discovery and events from over 14 years ago. The document concludes by asserting that Mr. Epstein is not a flight risk or a threat to the community and requests that the court grant his release.
DOJ-OGR-00020774.jpg
This legal document argues that the PROTECT Act's statute of limitations applies to Maxwell's past conduct. It counters Maxwell's argument by explaining that Congress removed an express retroactivity provision from the bill due to constitutional concerns raised by figures like Senator Leahy, not to prevent its application to cases where the statute of limitations had not yet expired.
DOJ-OGR-00018426.jpg
This is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, documenting the cross-examination of a witness named Kate. The questioning focuses on her knowledge of being mentioned in a book, for which she confirms giving her attorney permission, and establishes that she has a private practice as a music therapist in California for which she is not required to be licensed.
DOJ-OGR-00015806.jpg
This document is a flight log page signed by pilot David Rodgers for aircraft N908JE covering flights between March 31 and May 13, 1992. The log details numerous flights between locations including Teterboro (TEB), Columbus (CMH), West Palm Beach (PBI), Boston (BOS), and Key West (EYW). The column containing remarks and potential passenger names is completely redacted.
DOJ-OGR-00030633.jpg
This Probable Cause Affidavit from the Palm Beach Police Department, dated May 1, 2006, outlines an investigation into Jeffrey Epstein. It details police interviews with a woman named Robson, who admitted to arranging for underage girls to 'work' for Epstein and compared herself to 'Hollywood Madam' Heidi Fleiss. The document also describes interviews with two minors recruited by Robson: a 16-year-old named JS and an unnamed 17-year-old from her high school.
DOJ-OGR-00030610.jpg
This Probable Cause Affidavit from the Palm Beach Police Department, sworn by Det. Joe Recarey on May 1, 2006, details an investigation into Jeffrey Epstein. It outlines evidence against Haley Robson for recruiting underage girls, including a recorded statement where she compares herself to 'Heidi Fleiss'. The document also describes interviews with two minors, JS and another unnamed girl, who were brought to Epstein's residence or another house by Robson.
DOJ-OGR-00030478.jpg
This document is page 3 of a legal letter dated June 5, 2006, from the Law Offices of Gerald B. Lefcourt to Ms. Lanna Belohlavek. It provides a legal analysis of sex offender registration laws in New York, California, Colorado, and Florida, particularly concerning convictions from other jurisdictions. The letter highlights that courts in states like New York and California may examine the underlying conduct of an offense, rather than just its formal elements, to determine if registration is required.
DOJ-OGR-00017096.jpg
This court transcript from August 10, 2022, captures a legal argument made outside the presence of the jury. Attorney Ms. Sternheim objects to a statement made by opposing counsel, Ms. Moe, during closing arguments. The core of the dispute is whether a massage table's origin in California is sufficient to prove an effect on interstate commerce, a key element of the charges, with Ms. Sternheim arguing that this interpretation is incorrect.
DOJ-OGR-00016594.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Loftus. In the testimony, Loftus describes their professional affiliations with several major psychological organizations. They highlight their past leadership roles, including serving as president for the Association for Psychological Science, the Western Psychological Association (twice), and divisions of the American Psychological Association.
DOJ-OGR-00016517.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the testimony of a Ms. Espinosa. She describes her current role as a senior executive assistant to a CEO and recounts her past employment history, specifically moving to New York around October 1996. Upon arriving, she was hired by J. Epstein & Co. as a legal assistant for the legal team, which included counsels Jeff Schantz and Darren Indyke.
DOJ-OGR-00009164.jpg
This legal document, filed on February 24, 2022, discusses a motion by Juror 50 to obtain his own jury questionnaire and voir dire testimony transcript. The defendant opposes the request, framing it as a 'discovery request' that would prejudice an 'investigation' into the juror's conduct. The Government argues that Juror 50 is not a defendant seeking discovery and that the privacy concerns for sealing such documents do not apply to the juror himself.
DOJ-OGR-00031277.jpg
This document, an excerpt from an Albuquerque Tribune Online article, details political contributions from several sources. It outlines donations from businessman Perenchio to California Governor Gray Davis and others, and focuses on the $87,417 in financial backing provided to a candidate named Richardson by the Maloof family. The article also notes a $50,000 donation from BGK Equities III LLC, a real estate firm that leases office space to state agencies.
DOJ-OGR-00031243.jpg
This document is a printout from the Albuquerque Tribune Online, dated via URL to December 7, 2002, listing financial contributors to an unspecified entity (likely a political campaign given the context of 'donate' and 'political committee' descriptions). The page lists 16 separate entities and individuals, each contributing exactly $10,000. The document bears a Department of Justice (DOJ) stamp (DOJ-OGR-00031243) and a Public Records Request number, indicating it was released as part of a federal investigation or FOIA request.
DOJ-OGR-00013970.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, from the direct examination of a witness named Loftus. Loftus describes their professional affiliations with several major psychological organizations, including the Association for Psychological Science, the Western Psychological Association, and the American Psychological Association, highlighting past presidencies and other leadership roles within these groups.
DOJ-OGR-00010710.jpg
This legal document, part of a court filing, argues that victims identified as Sarah and Elizabeth should be permitted to read their victim impact statements aloud at Maxwell's criminal sentencing. It cites legal precedents, such as United States v. Wilson and Kelly v. California, to support the court's authority to consider such testimony and asserts that doing so will not cause unfair prejudice to Maxwell. A footnote clarifies that Maxwell does not have the right to cross-examine victims during sentencing hearings.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity