This page is an excerpt from a legal filing dated April 1, 2021, arguing for Ghislaine Maxwell's release on bail. The defense contends that wealthy male defendants with foreign ties (listing specific examples like Madoff and Weinstein) were granted bail to prepare for trial, and Maxwell deserves the same treatment. It cites legal precedents stating that pretrial detention is an 'extraordinary remedy' reserved for limited cases.
This legal document, filed on July 12, 2019, is a memorandum arguing against a defendant's proposal for bail involving home confinement, electronic monitoring, and a private security force. The prosecution contends that these measures are insufficient to ensure the defendant's appearance in court, citing numerous legal precedents that question the security, fairness, and practicality of such "private jail" arrangements. The document asserts that a private security firm cannot replicate the controlled environment of a federal facility and that allowing wealthy defendants to fund their own detention is legally problematic.
This document is a page from a bibliography or Curriculum Vitae for Stephen Gillers, filed as Exhibit A-5865 in the Ghislaine Maxwell case (1:20-cr-00330) on Feb 24, 2021. It lists 19 publications authored by Gillers between 1988 and 1993 in various legal journals and newspapers, covering topics such as legal ethics, prosecutorial conduct, and constitutional rights. The document appears to be part of expert witness credentials submitted to the court.
An email thread from July 2018 between Jeffrey Epstein and attorney David Schoen. They discuss the Robert Mueller investigation, with Schoen offering harsh criticisms of prosecutors Jeannie Rhee and Greg Andres, while Epstein compares the bias of FBI agent Peter Strzok to mob prosecutors. Schoen also mentions media coverage tying Epstein to Donald Trump and the #MeToo movement, expressing regret that he was not chosen to help Epstein with his legal defense.
An email chain from July 4, 2018, between Jeffrey Epstein (using the alias jeevacation) and attorney David Schoen. They discuss the Mueller investigation, specifically criticizing Peter Strzok, Andrew McCabe, and Andrew Weissmann for alleged political bias and misconduct. Schoen provides a detailed anecdote accusing Weissmann of unethical behavior in the EDNY.
This document is an email exchange from July 4, 2018, originating from a House Oversight collection. Attorney David Schoen writes to Jeffrey Epstein, harshly criticizing the composition of Robert Mueller's special counsel team, alleging specific members like Andrew Weissmann, Jeannie Rhee, and Greg Andres have a history of prosecutorial misconduct and extreme anti-Trump/pro-Clinton bias. Epstein replies briefly, questioning if Schoen's concerns are 'overblown' and drawing parallels to other prosecutors.
This document is an email chain from July 4, 2018, between Jeffrey Epstein (jeevacation@gmail.com) and an unidentified correspondent. Their discussion covers political and legal topics, including the perceived media-seeking behavior of Alan Dershowitz, and allegations of political bias within the FBI, specifically regarding Peter Strzok and Andrew McCabe's alleged efforts to prevent Donald Trump's presidency. The correspondent also references an unnamed person who they believe 'cut and run' in Epstein's legal case.
This document is an email chain from July 2018 between Jeffrey Epstein (using 'jeevacation@gmail.com') and lawyer David I. Schoen. Schoen provides commentary on various legal and political figures he alleges are biased (Jeannie Rhee, Greg Andres), while Epstein asks questions comparing prosecutors. Schoen also expresses sympathy for the negative press and legal troubles Epstein is facing, mentioning an article connecting him to '#metoo' and Trump.
This document is an email chain from July 4, 2018, involving Jeffrey Epstein (using the email 'jeevacation@gmail.com') and an unidentified correspondent. The correspondent refers to Alan Dershowitz as Epstein's 'friend' and heavily criticizes the Mueller investigation, accusing team member Andrew Weissmann of being a 'Pathological Liar' and alleging that officials Peter Strzok and Andrew McCabe conspired to stop Donald Trump from becoming president. Epstein's reply discusses the nature of Strzok's testimony and questions about prosecutorial bias.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity