Mr. Mueller's prosecutors
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
President Trump
|
Investigator subject |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
Mr. Comey
|
Succession of investigation |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
George Papadopoulos
|
Subject of investigation |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | An investigation by a special counsel, referred to as 'Mr. Mueller's investigation', which the au... | N/A | View |
| 2017-05-01 | N/A | Mr. Mueller was appointed as special counsel. | Not specified | View |
| 2017-05-01 | N/A | Appointment of Mr. Mueller as special counsel. | United States | View |
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026495.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a House Oversight Committee report (likely Republican-authored) criticizing the origins of the FBI's 'Crossfire Hurricane' investigation. It argues that the investigation into the Trump campaign was based on flimsy evidence, specifically attacking the credibility of the George Papadopoulos entrapment theory and the Steele Dossier, while contrasting this with alleged financial ties between the Clintons and Russian interests. The text details specific dates in August 2016 regarding letters sent to FBI Director Comey by Democrats pushing the collusion narrative.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026493.jpg
This document discusses the findings of Inspector General Horowitz regarding political bias in FBI investigations involving James Comey and Peter Strzok, arguing that this bias taints the subsequent Mueller investigation. It cites legal precedents, such as *U.S. v. Russell* and *Blackledge v. Perry*, to argue that due process violations stemming from biased investigations function as "fruit of a poisonous tree," potentially invalidating convictions and indictments.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026486.jpg
The text argues that political bias among FBI officials tainted the Russia investigation and the subsequent appointment of Special Counsel Robert Mueller, likening the situation to the "fruit of a poisonous tree" legal doctrine. It cites several Supreme Court precedents regarding due process to suggest that such governmental bias creates an unfair process that should invalidate legal proceedings.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026284.jpg
This document, an excerpt from a House Oversight report, argues against the narrative of Trump-Russia collusion, citing a lack of evidence and suggesting political bias in the FBI's 'Crossfire' investigation. It details pre-election efforts by figures like Harry Reid and media outlets to publicize the collusion story through letters to the FBI and reporting on the Steele dossier. The document is about the 2016 US presidential election and is not related to Jeffrey Epstein.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026282.jpg
This document, from a House Oversight file, presents a legal argument that the special counsel investigation led by Robert Mueller was tainted from its origin. It cites an inspector general's report on Peter Strzok's text messages as evidence of bias that cast a 'cloud' over the FBI's 'Crossfire' investigation, arguing the entire effort became 'fruit of a poisonous tree.' The author supports this due process violation claim with several Supreme Court precedents regarding prosecutorial and judicial bias. The document does not contain any information related to Jeffrey Epstein.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026278.jpg
This document is an email from David Rivkin to Andrew Grossman, a partner at BakerHostetler, dated June 22, 2018. Rivkin requests a copy of a Wall Street Journal op-ed. The email includes the text of what appears to be that op-ed, co-authored by Rivkin and a Ms. Foley, which argues for pausing the Mueller investigation and mentions its publication date as June 23, 2018. The document contains no information related to Jeffrey Epstein.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026275.jpg
This document, from a source labeled 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT', presents a legal argument that the special counsel investigation led by Robert Mueller was fundamentally tainted and a violation of due process. The author contends that the preceding FBI 'Crossfire' investigation was politically motivated, and this bias rendered all subsequent activities, including Mueller's appointment and findings, as 'fruit of a poisonous tree'. The text does not contain any information related to Jeffrey Epstein or his associates; its entire focus is on the Mueller investigation and related legal precedents.
Russia investigation
Michael Cohen is reported to be 'talking with Mr. Mueller’s prosecutors' after his guilty plea.
Russia investigation
Michael Cohen is reported to be 'talking with Mr. Mueller’s prosecutors' after his guilty plea.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity