The Estate
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Administrator
|
Procedural |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Claimant
|
Adversarial claims |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Administrator
|
Informational |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Claimant
|
Adversarial procedural |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
victims
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Andrew Tomback
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Claims process | The document describes the process for submitting, evaluating, and determining claims for the Eps... | Washington, D.C. | View |
| 2020-06-15 | N/A | Date before which the Estate will not list any property. | N/A | View |
| 2020-01-23 | N/A | Deadline for initial disclosures | N/A | View |
051.pdf
This document is a letter dated January 10, 2020, from attorney Bradley J. Edwards to Magistrate Judge Debra C. Freeman regarding five specific cases involving 'Doe' plaintiffs against Darren K. Indyke and other Epstein-related entities. Edwards informs the court that while discussions with the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program are productive, his clients do not wish to stay their lawsuits. The letter also outlines an agreed-upon discovery schedule with the Estate's counsel, Mr. Moskowitz.
022.pdf
A Notice of Change of Address filed on March 23, 2020, in the SDNY case Juliette Bryant v. Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn (Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein). Attorney Mary "Molly" S. DiRago of Troutman Sanders LLP notifies the court that her firm has moved from One North Wacker Drive to 227 W. Monroe Street in Chicago, IL. She confirms she will continue as counsel of record.
EFTA00030439.pdf
This document is an email chain from December 2019 between attorneys at Kaplan Hecker & Fink LLP (Roberta Kaplan, Alex Conlon, Kate Doniger) and a redacted party. They discuss legal proceedings involving the Epstein Estate, specifically criticizing a 'draft protocol' received from Feinberg as a 'disaster' and referencing filings in the USVI. Notable discussions include a court transcript where it was stated that Epstein's brother is the sole beneficiary of the estate, and Judge Failla's comment regarding claims potentially worth 'millions upon millions of dollars.'
EFTA00027460.pdf
This document is an email chain between officials at the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS) dated between June 30 and July 2, 2021. The discussion centers on whether to notify Mark Epstein (Jeffrey Epstein's brother) and his lawyer, Stacey Richman, about the imminent release of Jeffrey Epstein's autopsy report by the Office of Chief Medical Examiner (OCME). The officials agree to notify Richman as 'the human thing to do,' and subsequently report that she was appreciative and inquired about obtaining further information via FOIA requests.
EFTA00026530.pdf
This document is an email chain from May 2020 between an Assistant U.S. Attorney (SDNY) and Andrew Tomback (White & Case), representing the Epstein Estate. The AUSA is inquiring about the existence of historical surveillance videos (noting they are likely overwritten) and requesting digital copies of physical photographs located in Epstein's Florida and New Mexico residences which were not previously seized by warrant. Tomback confirms the Estate will not list any property for sale before June 15, 2020.
EFTA00019570.pdf
This email chain from December 2019 between the Kaplan Hecker & Fink legal team and redacted recipients discusses court transcripts and the administration of the Epstein Estate. Key revelations include the confirmation that Mark Epstein (Jeffrey's brother) was identified by Estate lawyers (Bennet Moskowitz) as the sole beneficiary of the estate. The emails also mention that the 'Feinberg draft protocol' (likely regarding the victim compensation fund) was received and considered a 'disaster' by Kaplan's team.
DOJ-OGR-00014799.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript filed on August 22, 2022, for Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). Defense attorney Mr. Everdell argues that a 'bequest' listed in the defendant's financial affidavit should not be considered an asset for the purpose of calculating fines because the source estate is in bankruptcy and paying out victims' claims, making the asset 'tenuous.' The Court questions the status of the bequest and asks Ms. Moe (likely the prosecution) for a response.
DOJ-OGR-00005176.jpg
This legal document, filed on September 7, 2021, outlines the program integrity and confidentiality rules for a claims resolution program. It details the responsibilities of claimants to provide truthful information, the severe consequences of fraudulent claims including referral to law enforcement, and the strict confidentiality protocols governing how claimant information is handled by the Program Administrator. The document specifies that only very limited information can be shared with 'the Estate' for the purpose of claim evaluation, ensuring claimant privacy is protected.
DOJ-OGR-00005175.jpg
This legal document outlines the procedures for claimants in the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program, specifically regarding the 'Release' and 'Payments' sections. It details that to receive compensation, a claimant must sign a full Release, waiving all future legal claims against the Epstein Estate, and must consult with an attorney before doing so. Upon receipt of the executed Release, the Program Administrator will initiate payment to the claimant via check or electronic transfer.
DOJ-OGR-00005173.jpg
This legal document, filed on September 7, 2021, outlines the procedures for the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program. It details how claimants can submit forms and supporting documentation to the program's Administrator, Jordana H. Feldman, in Washington, D.C. The document also describes the factors the Administrator will consider when evaluating claims, such as medical records and contemporaneous correspondence, to determine the credibility of sexual abuse allegations.
DOJ-OGR-00005172.jpg
This document is page 17 of a court filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated September 7, 2021, outlining the Claims Submission Process for the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program. It details how victims—both those who have filed lawsuits and those who have not—can register for the program via www.EpsteinVCP.com or through their attorneys. It specifies that while litigation can continue concurrently with program participation, all lawsuits must be dismissed with prejudice before accepting a compensation offer.
DOJ-OGR-00005170.jpg
This legal document, filed on September 7, 2021, outlines the protocol for a claims program designed for victims-survivors, potentially related to Epstein. It details the role of the Program's Administrator and the engagement of Professor Marci A. Hamilton, a sexual abuse expert, who will advise the Administrator but is restricted from direct contact with claimants. The document emphasizes fair treatment, confidentiality, and the specific procedures for claim submission and review within a nine-month filing period.
DOJ-OGR-00005154.jpg
This legal document, filed on September 7, 2021, outlines the integrity and confidentiality protocols for a claims program. It details how the Program Administrator will verify claims to prevent fraud, including reporting suspicious claims to law enforcement, and specifies the strict confidentiality rules governing the handling of a claimant's information, particularly the limited data shared with 'the Estate' for evaluation purposes.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity