150 East 10th Avenue, Denver, Colorado 80203
LocationRelationship Network
DOJ-OGR-00005378.jpg
This document is a legal letter dated October 25, 2021, from attorney Jeffrey S. Pagliuca to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Pagliuca informs the court that the defense has filed an Omnibus Response to the Government's Motions in Limine under seal to allow time to review for necessary redactions, with a public filing and justification letter to follow by October 29, 2021.
DOJ-OGR-00002675.jpg
This document is the second page of a legal filing (Document 145) in case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, filed on February 4, 2021. It lists the contact information for the law firms Haddon, Morgan & Foreman P.C. and the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim, identifying them as the attorneys representing Ghislaine Maxwell.
DOJ-OGR-00002672.jpg
This document is the conclusion page (page 18 of the specific filing, page 24 of the PDF) of a legal motion filed on February 4, 2021, in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). In this document, dated January 25, 2021, Maxwell's legal team (Cohen & Gresser LLP, Haddon, Morgan & Foreman P.C., and Bobbi C. Sternheim) formally requests that the Court dismiss the indictment against her. The page lists the contact information for all defense attorneys involved.
DOJ-OGR-00002690.jpg
This document is the conclusion of a legal motion filed on January 25, 2021, on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell. Her attorneys request that the Court either strike all references to 'Accuser-3' from specific paragraphs of the indictment or compel the government to provide advance notice before introducing any evidence related to that accuser. The document is signed by her legal team from three different law firms.
DOJ-OGR-00005226.jpg
This document is a letter dated October 14, 2021, from attorney Jeffrey Pagliuca to Judge Alison J. Nathan, confirming November 15, 2021, as the deadline for Ghislaine Maxwell to file a motion under Federal Rule of Evidence 412 concerning the admissibility of evidence of an alleged victim's sexual behavior, clarifying its distinction from a motion in limine and its specific procedural requirements.
DOJ-OGR-00002888.jpg
This document is a legal letter filed on April 5, 2021, by Laura A. Menninger, counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell, to Judge Alison J. Nathan. The letter requests a one-week continuance for the arraignment on the S2 Indictment, moving it from April 16 to April 23, 2021, due to a scheduling conflict in Colorado and ongoing evidence review. The letter notes that the government does not oppose the request and mentions that the delay would allow Maxwell's family time to arrange travel to attend.
DOJ-OGR-00008804.jpg
This document is a letter dated January 5, 2022, from attorney Jeffrey S. Pagliuca to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Pagliuca argues against the government's request for a hearing concerning a juror who revealed post-trial that they were a victim of sexual assault. He contends the request is premature and that, based on publicly available information and legal precedent, the court should order a new trial without an evidentiary hearing.
DOJ-OGR-00002715.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, filed on February 4, 2021. It identifies Laura A. Menninger and Bobbi C. Sternheim as the attorneys representing Ghislaine Maxwell. The document provides the names, law firms, addresses, and phone numbers for both attorneys.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity