| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
Congress
|
Political opposition |
8
Strong
|
1 | |
|
person
Mr. Stanton
|
Professional removal from office |
7
|
1 | |
|
organization
Congress
|
Conflict over executive power |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Merriman Smith
|
Professional journalist subject |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | President Johnson removed Secretary of War Stanton, challenging the constitutionality of the Tenu... | United States | View |
| N/A | N/A | Passage of the Tenure of Office Act over President Johnson's veto. | United States | View |
| N/A | N/A | The Tenure of Office Act was passed over President Johnson's veto. This act placed restrictions o... | United States | View |
| N/A | N/A | White House press conferences | White House | View |
| 2025-05-01 | N/A | Release of a magazine issue containing attacks on President Johnson. | Washington newsstands | View |
| 1963-12-31 | N/A | President Johnson signed the Public Works Appropriations Act, stating he would treat its legislat... | N/A | View |
This document is a legal and historical memorandum, identified by the footer 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012392', which compiles precedents regarding the separation of powers within the U.S. government. It cites historical statements, letters, and congressional reports to explore the President's authority to challenge or refuse to implement legislation deemed unconstitutional. The document contains no information related to Jeffrey Epstein or any associated individuals or events.
This document is a legal memorandum, identified as 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012387', outlining the constitutional basis for a U.S. President to refuse to enforce a statute believed to be unconstitutional. It details the President's duty to defend executive power and uses the 1926 Supreme Court case Myers v. United States, involving President Wilson, as a key historical precedent. The document contains no information related to Jeffrey Epstein or his associates.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity