This document contains two slides from a KPCB (Kleiner Perkins) presentation titled 'USA Inc. | Income Statement Drilldown' (pages 89 and 90). The charts analyze US economic data, specifically showing the rise in entitlement spending per beneficiary from 1966-2008 and the negative correlation between rising entitlement income and falling personal savings rates from 1970-2010. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020886' stamp, indicating it is part of a larger production of documents for a congressional investigation.
This document consists of pages 35 and 36 from a KPCB presentation titled 'USA Inc. | High Level Thoughts'. It presents a financial analysis of the US Federal Government, treating it as a corporation ('USA Inc.'). The slides compare structural versus cyclical operating deficits between 1996 and 2010, highlighting a massive increase in structural loss, and provide a glossary translating economist terminology (e.g., Structural Deficit) into equity investor terminology (e.g., Cash Flow ex. One-Time Items). The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp.
This document is page 24 of a Bank of America Merrill Lynch 'Equity Strategy Focus Point' report dated January 29, 2017. It details the methodology for estimating the impact of tax repatriation, border adjustments, and lower corporate tax rates on S&P 500 earnings per share (EPS), specifically referencing Donald Trump's tax proposals. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was part of a document production for a congressional investigation.
This is page 7 of a Bank of America Merrill Lynch 'Equity Strategy Focus Point' report dated January 29, 2017. The document analyzes the potential impact of tax repatriation policies, estimating that S&P 500 companies could bring back over $1 trillion in overseas cash, primarily in the Tech and Health Care sectors. It draws historical comparisons to the 2004 Homeland Investment Act, noting that despite intentions to spur investment and hiring, the majority of repatriated funds in 2004 were used for stock buybacks and dividends. The document bears the stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023075', indicating it was part of a document production to the House Oversight Committee, likely related to investigations into financial institutions connected to Jeffrey Epstein, though Epstein himself is not mentioned on this specific page.
This document appears to be a glossary page (labeled 'USA Inc.') produced by KPCB (Kleiner Perkins), defining various economic and government finance terms such as 'Business Cycle,' 'Cash Accounting,' and 'Conservatorship.' It bears a Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021077,' indicating it was included in a document production for the House Oversight Committee, likely as part of a larger report analyzing US government finances.
This document consists of two slides from a KPCB presentation titled 'USA Inc.' discussing US government fiscal policy, specifically focusing on expense reduction and federal wage reforms. It contrasts data from USA Today/Cato Institute, the OMB/OPM, and The Heritage Foundation regarding whether federal employees are paid significantly more than private sector counterparts. The document contains a Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021009', suggesting it was part of a document production for a congressional investigation.
This document analyzes US Federal spending for the 2010 fiscal year, treating the government as "USA Inc." and highlighting that entitlement spending constitutes more than half of the $29,043 expense per household. It also outlines strategic recommendations for improving government operating efficiency, such as independent audits, budget process reforms, and privatization of assets.
This document consists of two slides (numbered 331 and 332) from a KPCB presentation titled 'USA Inc. | What Might a Turnaround Expert Consider?'. The slides present macroeconomic data visualizing the rise of US government spending (total and federal) relative to median household income between 1967 and 2010. The document bears the Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021007, indicating it was produced as part of a House Oversight Committee investigation, likely related to financial documents or attachments found within the scope of the inquiry.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity