John Searle
PersonRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Turing
|
Intellectual philosophical opposition |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Chinese Room Argument
|
Creator author |
5
|
1 |
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016973.jpg
This document page, marked as House Oversight evidence, appears to be an excerpt from a philosophical or scientific essay discussing the ethics of artificial intelligence, human rights, and cognitive science. It references various thought experiments (Chinese Room, Milgram) and figures (Scott Adams, Isaac Asimov, Daniel Kahneman) to explore the legal and moral distinctions between humans, hybrids, and machines. The text argues that future machines may obtain rights similar to corporations and discusses the inconsistencies in how society handles privacy and cognitive differences.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016848.jpg
This document appears to be a page (p. 45) from an essay or book, likely authored by philosopher Daniel Dennett (identified via Footnote 10), included as an exhibit in a House Oversight investigation. The text discusses the limitations and philosophical implications of Artificial Intelligence, critiquing Joseph Weizenbaum's views on 'Strong AI' and referencing IBM's Watson and George Church. The document is stamped 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016848', suggesting it was gathered as evidence, likely related to inquiries into Jeffrey Epstein's funding of scientific research or the Edge Foundation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016844.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a book or essay collection (page 41) bearing a House Oversight stamp. It contains a biographical introduction for philosopher Dan Dennett, written in the first person. The text details Dennett's standing in the AI community, contrasts his views with philosophers like Searle and Fodor, and recounts a conversation from 25 years prior where AI pioneer Marvin Minsky praised Dennett as the 'next Bertrand Russell.'
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015912.jpg
This document is page 222 of a book titled 'Are the Androids Dreaming Yet?'. It discusses the history of computing, specifically the Universal Turing Machine, the transition from single-purpose to general-purpose machines, and Searle's Chinese Room argument. While the content is academic, the footer 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015912' indicates this page was included in a document production for the House Oversight Committee, potentially as part of an investigation involving individuals connected to science or technology (e.g., Epstein's connections to the scientific community), though no specific associates are named on this page.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015765.jpg
This document appears to be page 75 of a book manuscript or scientific essay discussing Artificial Intelligence, the Turing Test, and the 'Uncanny Valley.' The author argues that computers cannot replicate human creativity or 'non-computable' thought, citing the solving of Fermat's Last Theorem by Andrew Wiles as an example of human-specific intellect. The page is stamped 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015765,' indicating it was collected as evidence during a congressional investigation, likely related to Jeffrey Epstein's connections to the scientific community or his personal papers.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015757.jpg
This document appears to be page 67 of a textbook or popular science book discussing Artificial Intelligence and Systems Theory, specifically focusing on Searle's Chinese Room, the Turing Test, and Black Box experiments in electronics. It contains diagrams illustrating circuit equivalence (including a humorous drawing of a cat in a circuit). The document bears the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015757', indicating it was included in a document production for the House Oversight Committee, likely as part of an investigation into Jeffrey Epstein's connections to the scientific community or academia.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015756.jpg
This document appears to be a page (page 66) from a book titled 'Are the Androids Dreaming Yet?' included in a House Oversight investigation (Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015756). The text discusses the 'Chinese Room' philosophical thought experiment by John Searle, arguing that computers process syntax but lack semantic understanding, contrasting this with the 'System Argument' favored by AI proponents. While likely part of discovery regarding Jeffrey Epstein's scientific funding or interests, the text itself is purely philosophical and contains no specific transaction or flight data.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015754.jpg
This document contains a simple orange line drawing captioned 'Searle's Chinese Room' alongside a philosophical quote attributed to Albert Einstein. It bears a Bates stamp from the House Oversight Committee, likely indicating it was part of materials seized or produced during an investigation into Jeffrey Epstein, reflecting his known interest in theoretical science and consciousness.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016091.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a manuscript or book draft titled 'Appendix 5: Index of Theorems.' It lists various scientific and philosophical concepts related to artificial intelligence and human understanding, including the Turing Test, the Singularity, and the Chinese Room paradox. The document bears a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp, indicating it was part of a document production likely related to investigations involving Jeffrey Epstein, known for his interest in and funding of theoretical science and transhumanism.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016390.jpg
This document is page 170 of a House Oversight exhibit (likely related to Jeffrey Epstein's scientific interests or funding). It contains a philosophical essay discussing the evolution of rights for humans, hybrids, and machines (AI), referencing cognitive science experiments, Isaac Asimov's laws of robotics, and the potential for machines to gain corporate-like rights. The text explores the ethical implications of facial recognition, artificial consciousness, and the unequal application of rights across biological and artificial entities.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity