JANE DOE NO. 3
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Y. Doe
|
Same person |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
defendant
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Haley Robson
|
Recruiter recruit |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Herman
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
location
Boies, Schiller & Flexner LLP
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Subject of testimony statements |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
ALAN DERSHOWITZ
|
Accused accuser |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Mr. Epstein
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Abuser victim |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
ALAN DERSHOWITZ
|
Alleged connection denial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Al Gore
|
Alleged connection via subpoena |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Bill Clinton
|
Alleged connection via subpoena |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Victim trafficker |
5
|
1 | |
|
location
Boies, Schiller & Flexner LLP
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jessica Arbour
|
Client |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Bill Clinton
|
Alleged meeting |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Al Gore
|
Alleged meeting |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Alan M. Dershowitz
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Paul Cassell
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
defendant
|
Adversarial threatening |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Defendant plaintiff abuser victim context |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Sexual Trafficking | Unknown | View |
| N/A | Relocation | Jane Doe No. 3 moved to New York City from a small town to pursue a modeling career. | New York City | View |
| N/A | Meeting | Jane Doe No. 3 was introduced to Mr. Epstein by an unnamed female. | Mr. Epstein's New York home | View |
| N/A | N/A | Florida Defamation Action | Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | Alleged sexual assault/massage incident. | Epstein's Palm Beach mansion | View |
| N/A | Legal filing | A request for a protective order was filed, asking that the deposition in a criminal case and a c... | United States District Cour... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Issuance of Subpoena to Jane Doe No. 3 | Unspecified | View |
| N/A | N/A | Deposition of Jane Doe No. 3 (limited to 4 hours). | Offices of Boies, Schiller ... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Alleged meeting between Jane Doe No. 3, Bill Clinton, and Al Gore (disputed relevance). | Little Saint James Island, ... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Deposition of Jane Doe No. 3 | Offices of Boies, Schiller ... | View |
| 2019-09-03 | Court hearing | Victims provide statements in a court proceeding related to Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB. | N/A | View |
| 2015-11-02 | N/A | Court consideration of motions to quash subpoenas. | Circuit Court of the 17th J... | View |
| 2015-01-19 | N/A | Date of a Declaration referenced in Request no. 1. | Federal Court (implied) | View |
| 2009-11-24 | N/A | Jeffrey Epstein violated court orders by appearing at 250 S. Australian Ave during Jane Doe No. 3... | 250 S. Australian Avenue, W... | View |
| 2008-03-05 | N/A | Jane Doe No. 3 files federal lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein. | West Palm Beach | View |
| 1999-01-01 | N/A | Time period specified in subpoena request regarding payments from Epstein | Unknown | View |
008.pdf
This document is a legal response filed by Plaintiff Jane Doe 101 in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida on May 1, 2009. The plaintiff agrees to the court's order to consolidate ten separate cases filed by various Jane Does and C.M.A. against Jeffrey Epstein for the purposes of discovery. The document includes a service list detailing the contact information for attorneys representing the various plaintiffs and the defendant.
006.pdf
This document is a court order from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, signed by Judge Kenneth A. Marra on April 28, 2009. It addresses ten separate civil cases filed against Jeffrey Epstein by various plaintiffs (Jane Does and C.M.A.). The order grants the plaintiffs' motion to consolidate cases for discovery purposes and grants a protective order limiting Epstein to a single deposition per plaintiff to prevent piecemeal depositions, while also ordering parties in remaining cases to show cause why they should not also be consolidated.
EFTA00031937.pdf
A 2009 article from PalmBeachDailyNews.com details Jeffrey Epstein's release from Palm Beach County jail to serve one year of probation at his home without electronic monitoring. The article includes reactions from victims (Jane Doe No. 3 and No. 5) and their attorneys, who express outrage at the leniency of the sentence and fear of Epstein's wealth and influence. It also lists the specific conditions of his probation, including a curfew and restrictions on contact with minors.
DOJ-OGR-00000677.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript where victims are giving statements. An unidentified speaker discusses the societal problem of victim-blaming. Another victim, Jane Doe No. 3, begins her testimony, recounting how she moved to New York City 15 years prior to pursue modeling and was subsequently introduced to Mr. Epstein by a woman who portrayed him as someone who could help her career.
DOJ-OGR-00030392.jpg
This legal document, dated March 31, 2008, is a motion for a protective order filed by the law firm Herman & Mermelstein, P.A. on behalf of 'Witness Y. Doe'. The motion requests that the court order the witness's deposition for an unspecified criminal case and the civil case 'Jane Doe No. 3 v. Jeffrey Epstein' to be conducted simultaneously. The stated purpose is to prevent potential harassment of the witness by the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00030390.jpg
This document is a 'Motion for Protective Order' filed in the Circuit Court of Palm Beach County, Florida, in the case of State of Florida v. Jeffrey Epstein. The motion is filed by a witness/victim identified anonymously as 'Y. Doe' (also 'Jane Doe No. 3' in a federal civil case), requesting that her deposition scheduled for April 2, 2008, in the criminal case be conducted simultaneously with her deposition for the civil case. The document explicitly states that Y. Doe alleges she was sexually assaulted by Epstein when she was 16 years old.
DOJ-OGR-00031565.jpg
This legal document, dated March 31, 2008, is a request for a protective order filed by the law firm Herman & Mermelstein on behalf of 'Witness Y. Doe'. The motion asks the court to require that depositions for a criminal case and a civil case, 'Jane Doe No. 3 v. Jeffrey Epstein', be conducted at the same time to prevent harassment of the witness by Defendant Epstein. The filing states that counsel for the State and for Epstein were contacted about this request but have not responded.
DOJ-OGR-00031563.jpg
A Motion for Protective Order filed on March 31, 2008, in the Circuit Court of Palm Beach County. Witness 'Y. Doe,' an alleged victim claiming sexual assault by Epstein at age 16, requests that her deposition for the criminal case be consolidated with her deposition for her federal civil suit (Jane Doe No. 3 v. Jeffrey Epstein) scheduled for April 2, 2008.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016508.tif
This newspaper article from February 28, 2019, details the sexual abuse committed by Jeffrey Epstein, focusing on the testimony of Michelle Licata and the controversial non-prosecution agreement. It highlights the efforts of Palm Beach Police Chief Michael Reiner and Detective Joseph Recarey to pursue the case despite pressure, and the role of Epstein's high-profile legal team, including Alan Dershowitz and then-U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta, in securing a lenient deal. The article also touches on the defense's tactics to discredit victims and the broader context of Epstein's influence given his wealth and connections.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015616.jpg
This is a court order from the Circuit Court of Broward County, Florida, dated November 2, 2015, in the case of Edwards & Cassell v. Dershowitz. The court granted Boies, Schiller & Flexner LLP's motion to quash a subpoena against the firm entirely, but only partially granted a similar motion for 'Jane Doe No. 3,' ordering that she must submit to a deposition limited to four hours at the law firm's offices.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015610.jpg
This is page 12 of a legal filing (Bates stamped HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015610) arguing for protective measures regarding the deposition of 'Jane Doe No. 3,' a non-party witness identified as a victim of sexual trafficking orchestrated by Jeffrey Epstein. The filing requests that the Defendant be precluded from asking questions about the victim's sexual history or other trafficking victims, prohibits the use of specific derogatory language ('prostitute,' 'liar,' 'bad mother') previously used by the Defendant in the press, and demands that the Defendant not be physically present in the same room during testimony due to the victim's fear.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015608.jpg
This is page 10 of a legal filing, specifically an objection to a subpoena in a Florida defamation action (likely related to Alan Dershowitz). 'Jane Doe No. 3' is arguing to quash requests for her personal financial information and privileged communications with her legal counsel, Boies, Schiller & Flexner LLP (BSF). The document cites Florida case law regarding attorney-client privilege and references specific discovery requests asking about her media interactions regarding Epstein, Dershowitz, and Prince Andrew.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015607.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing arguing against a subpoena issued to a non-party (Jane Doe No. 3). The text asserts that the Defendant is abusing subpoena power to harass the non-party by seeking irrelevant personal financial information, specifically requesting records of payments from Jeffrey Epstein between 1999 and 2002, and information regarding a potential book deal. The filing argues that whether Epstein paid the minors he trafficked is irrelevant to the current action.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015606.jpg
This document is page 8 of a legal filing arguing against a Defendant's subpoena requests, characterizing them as a 'fishing expedition' and an abuse of power. The text specifically highlights 'Request no. 24,' which sought documents regarding Jane Doe No. 3's assertions that she met Bill Clinton, Al Gore, and Tipper Gore on Little Saint James Island. The filing argues these requests are irrelevant to the current court action and are being used to gather discovery for a separate federal case (Case No. 0S-SO736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON) involving Alan Dershowitz.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015604.jpg
This document is page 6 of a legal filing arguing against a subpoena issued by the Defendant to a non-party identified as Jane Doe No. 3 in a Florida defamation case. The filing characterizes the subpoena as harassment intended to put the non-party in jail and notes that the Defendant specifically requested documents relating to Bill Clinton and Al Gore. The document argues these requests are irrelevant and violate Florida Rules of Civil Procedure.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015601.jpg
This document is a background section of a legal motion filed by attorneys Paul Cassell and Brad Edwards in a defamation case. It argues that the Defendant (contextually Alan Dershowitz) is abusing subpoena power to harass a non-party victim, Jane Doe No. 3 (Virginia Giuffre), following a defamation campaign where the Defendant called the attorneys 'unethical' on the Today Show. The motion seeks to quash the subpoena to protect Jane Doe No. 3 from further intimidation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021526.jpg
An FBI FD-350 form archiving a March 6, 2008, Palm Beach Post article titled 'Another suit alleges sex during massage.' The article details a federal lawsuit filed by 'Jane Doe No. 3,' represented by attorney Jeffrey Herman, alleging Jeffrey Epstein sexually assaulted her during a massage at his Palm Beach home when she was 16 (in 2004/2005). The article mentions recruiter Haley Robson, Epstein's defense attorney Jack Goldberger's denial, and Epstein's prior 2006 indictment for solicitation of prostitution.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014096.jpg
This document is page 6 of a Motion to Compel Production of Documents filed by Bradley Edwards against Alan Dershowitz in March 2015. The plaintiffs argue that Dershowitz failed to produce documents proving he never met Jane Doe No. 3, despite claiming to the media he possessed such proof, and failed to file a privilege log while asserting blanket privileges. The motion requests the court to order immediate production of materials, declare privileges waived due to the lack of a log, and award attorneys' fees.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014094.jpg
This document is a page from a legal motion filed by Bradley Edwards against Alan Dershowitz in March 2015. It details Dershowitz's public denial of sexual abuse allegations made by 'Jane Doe No. 3' (Virginia Giuffre) and his claims on Fox Business that he possesses records proving his innocence and her dishonesty. The text outlines the timeline of legal filings in early January 2015, including Dershowitz's motion to intervene and Edwards' subsequent request for the production of the specific exculpatory records Dershowitz claimed to hold.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014092.jpg
This document page outlines the factual background for a motion to compel production of documents in the case Bradley Edwards vs. Dershowitz. It details Jane Doe No. 3's attempts to join a case regarding Jeffrey Epstein's non-prosecution agreement, her allegations of being trafficked to Prince Andrew and Alan Dershowitz, and Dershowitz's subsequent alleged defamatory media statements against attorneys Edwards and Cassell.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Received | Media/Publishers | JANE DOE NO. 3 | $0.00 | Subpoena Request no. 18 seeks documents regardi... | View |
| N/A | Paid | JANE DOE NO. 3 | Boies, Schiller &... | $0.00 | Legal retainer fees and agreements (referenced ... | View |
| 2008-03-05 | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | JANE DOE NO. 3 | $50,000,000.00 | Damages sought in federal lawsuit (more than $5... | View |
| 2004-01-01 | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | JANE DOE NO. 3 | $0.00 | Money for massage | View |
| 1999-01-01 | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | JANE DOE NO. 3 | $0.00 | Subpoena Request no. 20 seeks documents showing... | View |
Affidavit of Jane Doe No. 3
Cited as Exhibit 8.
Request no. 25
Request for documents concerning retention of Boies, Schiller & Flexner LLP
Statements regarding Epstein/Dershowitz/Prince Andrew
Hypothetical statements discussed in the context of discovery requests
Document Requests
Included 25 separate document requests, including requests regarding Bill Clinton, Al Gore, and personal diaries.
Legal Counsel
Referenced as Category 4 of documents sought by Defendant.
Age instruction
When he asks how old you are, tell him 18 or 19 years old.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity