This police incident report narrative details an attempt by Detectives Recarey and Caristo to interview a 17-year-old female in West Palm Beach regarding Jeffrey Epstein. The witness, who was described as crying and claiming to have put that life behind her, also stated she was 'in love' with Epstein and refused to speak; police accused her of providing other girls to Epstein. The report also details the analysis of a cell phone paid for by Epstein (billed to 457 Madison Ave, NYC), which revealed 87 pages of calls confirming that a redacted individual frequently contacted victims to notify them when Epstein was in town to 'work'.
This document is a Palm Beach Police Department incident report narrative describing the investigation into Jeffrey Epstein. It details police contact with the parents of a potential victim and a subsequent sworn taped statement from the victim, who describes being taken to Epstein's house at age sixteen to provide a massage for money. The narrative recounts her arrival at the house, interaction with staff, and the beginning of the massage session with 'Jeff'.
This document is a Palm Beach Police Department Incident Report dated July 13, 2006. It details the graphic testimony of a victim who describes escalating sexual encounters with Jeffrey Epstein and another redacted individual, including the use of sex toys and specific payments for acts. The report describes a specific instance of sexual assault where Epstein forcibly penetrated the victim vaginally against her will, after which he apologized, paid her $1,000, and gifted her a 2005 Dodge Neon.
This Palm Beach Police incident report details the investigation into Jeffrey Epstein, specifically focusing on interviews with two potential witnesses. One witness, a college student, provided a sworn statement that she was recruited to give Epstein a massage for money, during which he grabbed her buttocks and pulled her close. The report confirms she was paid $200 for the massage and that the person who brought her to the house was also compensated.
This Palm Beach Police Department incident report details surveillance and investigation activities regarding Jeffrey Epstein in April 2005. Investigators conducted trash pulls at 358 El Brillo, recovering flight logs for N908JE (listing pilots Rodgers and Visoski), handwritten notes about schedules, and messages about bringing a female to Epstein's house for an appointment. The report also documents police coordination with a school principal regarding a student and subpoena requests for phone records.
This Palm Beach Police Department incident report (Case 1-05-000368), generated on 7/13/06, details investigative steps taken in March and April 2005 regarding Jeffrey Epstein. It documents interviews with a redacted young female witness employed at Olive Garden who described an encounter with Epstein, noting her immature behavior during questioning. The report also details the drafting of subpoenas for phone records, surveillance on Epstein's home at 358 El Brillo, the verification of Epstein's concealed weapons permit, and the identification of a 'purple item' (identified as a 'Jelly Anal Wand') found during a trash pull at Epstein's residence.
A Palm Beach Police Department incident report from 2006 detailing a 2005 investigation into the recruitment of a female witness by another female (a recruiter) to visit Jeffrey Epstein. The report documents an interview where the witness admits the recruiter worked for a wealthy man named 'Jeff' (Epstein) and possibly performed sexual favors for him. Crucially, the witness states that during the drive to Epstein's house, the recruiter instructed her that if Epstein asked her age, she must say she was eighteen.
This email chain from May 2017 documents Jeffrey Epstein acting as a back-channel intermediary between a redacted individual (likely representing Kuwaiti interests) and US/International figures. Epstein discusses meetings at his house, including one with a person implied to be Ronald Lauder (referenced via a JPost link), describing him as 'the key' for his correspondent. The discussion focuses on the 'Amir's' desire to host Yemen peace talks in Kuwait and what specific actions they want from the US government.
This document is a court exhibit (Case 1:19-cv-03377) containing an excerpt from a March 2003 Vanity Fair article about Jeffrey Epstein. It details his biography from a middle-class upbringing in Brooklyn to teaching at Dalton and working at Bear Stearns, before establishing his own firm, J. Epstein & Co. The text highlights his acceptance into the 'Establishment' via connections with Leslie Wexner, and lists high-profile associates including academic leaders from Harvard, Nobel Prize-winning scientists, and Prince Andrew.
This court document (Case 1:19-cv-03377) outlines evidence refuting Alan Dershowitz's defenses regarding his interactions with Jeffrey Epstein and Virginia Roberts. It cites testimony from Epstein's staff (Alessi, Rodriguez) and other victims (Ransome, Farmer), as well as flight logs and police reports, to demonstrate that Dershowitz did stay at Epstein's home, flew on his plane without his wife, and was present around young females. The text also mentions a written communication from Roberts' lawyer to Dershowitz advising that his travel records were incomplete and that he should have settled the case.
This document is a log of digital messages sent by Jeffrey Epstein (via the alias 'jeeitunes') on March 28 and 29, 2019. In the messages, Epstein attempts to coordinate a visit to Paris with an unknown recipient, offers to arrange a meeting with French politician Jacques Lang at his home, and shares a Washington Post article about Donald Trump's finances.
This document is a page from James Patterson's book (likely 'Filthy Rich'), marked as evidence by the House Oversight Committee (Bates stamp 010542). It details the extremely lenient work release conditions granted to Jeffrey Epstein by Sheriff Ric Bradshaw, allowing Epstein 16 hours of freedom daily to visit his lawyer, his foundation, or his home on El Brillo Way. The text notes that associates Nadia Marcinkova and Jean-Luc Brunel were staying at the El Brillo Way property during this time, and Sheriff Bradshaw confirms that deputies entered the home.
In this self-addressed email from February 2019, Jeffrey Epstein reflects on his past legal troubles in Florida, criticizing the police and FBI investigation ('Operation Leap Year'). He details his relationship with Donald Trump, asserting that Trump visited his home frequently but never received massages, and analyzes Trump's real estate dealings, specifically the purchase and resale of Abe Gosman's estate. The document concludes with links to news articles and a cryptic reference to the death of investigator Joe Recarey.
This document, likely a news report or legal summary produced for the House Oversight Committee, details testimony from Epstein's house manager Juan Alessi regarding visits by Prince Andrew and Donald Trump. It contrasts their behaviors, noting Andrew received massages while Trump only ate dinner in the kitchen and declined massages. The text also discusses legal actions led by attorneys Scarola and Edwards regarding Epstein's non-prosecution agreement (the 'sweetheart deal') and a separate financial dispute involving Trump's golf club.
This document is a page from a legal affidavit responding to Jeffrey Epstein's allegations of improper discovery practices. The author justifies noticing Bill Clinton, David Copperfield, and Bill Richardson for depositions by citing specific evidence: Clinton's extensive flight history and contact info found in Epstein's directory; Copperfield's frequent visits and an allegation of improper touching by a victim; and Richardson's presence at the New Mexico ranch and return of campaign donations.
This document is an email thread from December 2017 between Jeffrey Epstein and an individual identified as 'anasalrasheed'. The correspondence coordinates a late-night visit to Epstein's home, includes a reference to a 'special cake from New York', and features a joke by the guest about not wanting to arrive early and find Donald Trump at the house. The thread concludes with the guest thanking Epstein for a 'nice gift' after the visit.
This document appears to be a personal narrative or draft written by Jeffrey Epstein reflecting on his legal representation and crimes. He criticizes his lawyers, Lewis and Tein, accusing them of celebrating his ongoing legal troubles for the sake of fees, and explicitly admits to being a 'john' who paid for sex while attempting to minimize the severity of his crimes by comparing them to jaywalking and claiming state attorneys found 'no real victims.' He discusses the age of consent in New York versus Florida and argues that the women involved were knowing participants.
This is page 6 of a legal memorandum from Kirkland & Ellis LLP, defending Jeffrey Epstein. The document argues that Epstein's conduct does not violate federal statutes 18 U.S.C. §§ 1591, 2422(b), or 2423(b), specifically focusing on § 2422(b) (coercion/enticement). The defense asserts that because Epstein's assistants made the phone calls to schedule massages without discussing sexual acts or possessing criminal intent at the time of the call, the 'interstate facility' element of the federal crime is not met.
This document appears to be a news article or narrative report included in House Oversight records detailing the obstruction and harassment faced by police investigators (Reiter and Recarey) during the Epstein probe. It highlights a shift in the prosecutor's (Krischer) willingness to prosecute, the leaking of evidence to Epstein's legal team, and the removal of hard drives and surveillance footage from Epstein's home prior to the October 20, 2005 search. The text describes intimidation tactics used against the officers, including stalking, trash theft, and background investigations by private eyes hired by Epstein's defense.
This document summarizes the 2005 police investigation into Jeffrey Epstein in Palm Beach, detailing allegations from a 14-year-old girl and others who were recruited by an associate, Haley Robson. It highlights conflicts between the Palm Beach police, who sought to arrest Epstein, and the state attorney's office, led by Mr. Krischer, which delayed proceedings. The defense, including lawyers Lefcourt and Dershowitz, actively worked to discredit the accusers.
This document is an email chain from December 2017 between Jeffrey Epstein and a redacted individual. The conversation covers personal travel plans, including trips to Dubai and the GCC, and a potential meeting at Epstein's house where the redacted person jokes about not wanting to 'find trump'. They also discuss a 'saudi project' which Epstein says will be discussed in January.
This document is a page from a deposition transcript where an unidentified witness is being questioned. The witness denies knowing Detective Recarey or speaking with anyone else who had been to Epstein's house. The witness also denies that they or their parents consulted with any law firms other than that of Mr. Herman and Mr. Leopold, and confirms they did speak with someone in preparation for the deposition.
This document is a transcript of an interview (page 70), likely from September 29, 2004, where an unidentified individual is questioned about several people in relation to Jeffrey Epstein. The interviewee claims a person named Zack knows about an event that happened at Mr. Epstein's house four years prior and is also questioned about their associations with Nick (linked to a missing person report) and Patrick (linked to an illegal firearm).
This document is page 66 of a deposition or interview transcript where an unnamed witness is questioned about their family and connections related to the Epstein case. The witness clarifies that 'Paul' is their mother's husband, not their sister's boyfriend, and confirms they have spoken with a 'Brett [REDACTED]' who knows the basics about an unspecified incident that occurred at Mr. Epstein's house.
This document is a page from a deposition transcript where an attorney, Mr. Tein, questions a witness about Jeffrey Epstein. The witness denies that Epstein or his staff ever harmed their father or his property, and is then questioned about a potentially false statement made to police regarding a trip with a person named Hayley to Epstein's house.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity