This is a legal letter dated December 16, 2021, from attorney Jeffrey S. Pagliuca to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The letter presents legal arguments concerning the impeachment of witnesses using inconsistent statements and '3500 material' (Jencks Act disclosures), citing specific case law to support the defense's procedural approach.
This document is a page from a sentencing memorandum filed on June 15, 2022, in the case of Ghislaine Maxwell. The defense argues that the Court should not apply a five-point sentencing adjustment for 'Repeat and Dangerous Sex Offender Against Minors' (USSG ยง 4B1.5), stating that Maxwell poses no continuing danger to the public and that the relevant conduct ended nearly 20 years prior. The text also references Judge Posner regarding the standard of proof required for sentencing factors.
This document is a page from the Federal Register dated August 30, 2011, not an Epstein-related document. It contains legal analysis by the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) justifying a new rule that requires employers to post notices of employee rights under the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA). The Board refutes arguments against the rule's validity, citing Supreme Court precedents and changing unionization rates, and compares the NLRA to other labor statutes.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity