Florida International University College of Law

Organization
Mentions
12
Relationships
0
Events
0
Documents
6
Also known as:
Florida International University

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.
No relationships found for this entity.
No events found for this entity.

EFTA00016268.pdf

This document is a defense expert witness disclosure letter in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, dated November 1, 2021. It details the qualifications and expected testimony of eight expert witnesses, covering topics such as false memory (Dr. Loftus), the lack of scientific basis for 'grooming-by-proxy' (Dr. Dietz), forensic psychiatry, prosecutorial misconduct, computer forensics, and document authentication. The defense strategy aims to challenge the reliability of memory, rebut government claims about grooming behaviors, and analyze financial and physical evidence.

Legal correspondence (expert witness disclosure)
2025-12-25

DOJ-OGR-00015252.tif

This document is a list of professional activities and engagements, likely for an academic or legal professional, spanning from 1998 to 2000. It details various conferences, lectures, meetings, and academic affiliations across numerous universities, legal associations, and scientific organizations in the United States and internationally. The topics covered include memory, psychology, law, criminal defense, and wrongful convictions.

List of professional activities/engagements
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00021205.jpg

This document outlines the professional histories and specific roles of several key figures from the U.S. Attorney's Office (USAO) who were involved in the Jeffrey Epstein investigation. It details the career paths of Jeffrey H. Sloman, Matthew I. Menchel, and Andrew C. Lourie within the USAO, describing their supervisory responsibilities, participation in meetings with defense counsel, and involvement in negotiating the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). The text also notes the career transitions of former U.S. Attorney Acosta, including his recusal from the Epstein matter and subsequent roles as Secretary of Labor and university dean.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00003207.jpg

This document, page 31 of a DOJ report (likely the OGR report), details the professional biographies and specific roles of USAO officials Jeffrey Sloman, Matthew Menchel, and Andrew Lourie in the Epstein investigation and the negotiation of the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). It highlights Sloman's negotiation of an NPA addendum, Menchel's communication of the two-year plea deal, and Lourie's role in the NPA negotiations before his departure. The text also notes Alexander Acosta's resignation as Labor Secretary in 2019 due to criticism regarding the Epstein case.

Legal filing / government report (doj office of professional responsibility)
2025-11-20

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026496.jpg

This document is an email or correspondence from Andrew Grossman (Partner) sharing the text of an opinion piece published on June 23, 2018, by Mr. Rivkin and Ms. Foley. The text criticizes the 'Crossfire' (Crossfire Hurricane) investigation into Donald Trump's campaign, arguing it was politically motivated and citing Harry Reid's October 30 letter to James Comey as evidence of perceived bias. The authors argue that Special Counsel Robert Mueller's investigation should be paused due to due process concerns. The document bears a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp.

Email / opinion piece clipping
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023006.jpg

This document appears to be a page from a House Oversight Committee report featuring a photo of Alexander Acosta and a text entry for 'October.' The text details a meeting between then-U.S. Attorney Acosta and Epstein's lawyer, Jay Lefkowitz, at a Marriott in West Palm Beach to finalize a non-prosecution agreement. Key terms agreed to included canceling grand jury subpoenas, sealing the deal, and agreeing not to notify the victims.

House oversight committee document (likely a report or exhibit containing a news clipping/timeline)
2025-11-19
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
0
As Recipient
0
Total
0
No communications found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity