| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-04-16 | N/A | Filing of Document 1 in Case 1:19-cv-03377 | Court (implied) | View |
| 2019-01-21 | N/A | Scheduled court hearing for the motion to unseal appellate briefs. | 27 Madison Avenue, New York... | View |
| 2015-11-12 | N/A | Court Order granting in part Jane Doe No. 3's Motion to Quash Subpoena or for a Protective Order. | Broward County, Florida | View |
| 2011-01-01 | N/A | People v. Epstein decision (1st Dep't 2011) holding Epstein must register as level three sex offe... | New York | View |
| 2005-01-01 | N/A | Court Opinion Issued | S.D.N.Y. | View |
This page from the book "How America Lost Its Secrets" argues that Edward Snowden deliberately orchestrated leaks to compromise U.S. and British surveillance operations, including PRISM and NSA encryption capabilities. It details his coordination with journalists like Greenwald and Poitras and suggests that by recommending end-to-end encryption, Snowden compromised intelligence gathering on terrorist activities similar to how Robert Hanssen compromised operations in the 1990s.
This document is a placeholder or index page from a production (marked HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019356) listing pages 257 through 310 as withheld. Each entry is marked as 'OTHER' with the justification 'Court Sealing Order'.
This document is page 247 from a book or report, containing the endnotes for a chapter titled "Raider of the Inner Sanctum." The citations exclusively reference sources of information about Edward Snowden, his hiring as an NSA contractor by Booz Allen, and the methods he allegedly used to leak classified information. Contrary to the prompt's framing, the document contains no information related to Jeffrey Epstein.
This document is page 20 of a deposition transcript where an attorney, Mr. Tein, questions an unnamed witness about an incident at Jeff Epstein's house three years prior. The witness confirms they previously told police they did not have sex with Epstein and maintains this denial, while also being questioned about a fifty-million-dollar civil complaint they filed against him.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity