Nick Bostrom
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Vinge
|
Intellectual academic |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Vinge
|
Intellectual peers |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Knowledge association |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Bill Gates
|
Association |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Author
|
Academic critique |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012-01-01 | N/A | Publication of 'Thinking Inside the Box' by Armstrong, Sandberg, and Bostrom. | Unknown | View |
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016893.jpg
This document appears to be a page (p. 90) from a book or manuscript discussing Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) and philosophy of mind. The text argues against standard testing objectives for AGI, citing the paradox of testing for disobedience and referencing Alan Turing, Karl Popper, and Nick Bostrom. The document bears a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp, suggesting it was part of evidence collected during an investigation, likely related to Epstein's connections to the scientific community.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016865.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a narrative or report (stamped by House Oversight) profiling physicist Max Tegmark. It details his founding of the Future of Life Institute (FLI) with Jaan Tallinn, lists high-profile scientific advisory board members like Elon Musk and Nick Bostrom, and discusses FLI's conferences in Puerto Rico and Asilomar regarding Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) safety.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016835.jpg
This document page discusses and rebuts common arguments against the risks posed by artificial intelligence, specifically addressing the notions that AI is not imminent, that critics are Luddites, and that intelligent machines will inherently have altruistic objectives. It cites figures like Nick Bostrom, Elon Musk, and Stephen Hawking, and references the "is-ought" problem and the "naturalistic fallacy" in the context of AI ethics.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016832.jpg
This document appears to be a page from an essay or book chapter titled 'The Purpose Put Into The Machine' by AI expert Stuart Russell. The text analyzes the historical warnings of Norbert Wiener regarding artificial intelligence, specifically the danger of machines executing objectives that do not align with human desires (the 'djinnee in a bottle' problem). While the text itself is academic, the footer 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016832' indicates this document was part of the House Oversight Committee's investigation, likely regarding Jeffrey Epstein's cultivation of relationships with prominent scientists and academics.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016818.jpg
This document appears to be page 15 of a manuscript, book proposal, or essay collection (likely edited by John Brockman given the list of Edge.org contributors) discussing Artificial Intelligence and the work of Norbert Wiener. It contains quotes from prominent scientists and thinkers like Freeman Dyson, Stewart Brand, and Danny Hillis regarding the future of AI. The document is stamped 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016818', indicating it was obtained as evidence during a Congressional investigation. The mention of 'the late Stephen Hawking' dates the writing of this specific text to after March 2018.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027659.jpg
A digital message log from the House Oversight Committee dated April 30, 2019, showing a conversation between Jeffrey Epstein (using the alias e:jeeitunes@gmail.com) and a redacted individual. The discussion touches on 'KSA' (Saudi Arabia) wanting people to stay away to avoid inspection/doubts, and references Oxford philosopher Nick Bostrom, whom Epstein describes as a 'bill gates guy'. The messages appear to be iMessage or similar digital correspondence data.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013260.jpg
This document is page 344 of a glossary or bibliography, stamped by the House Oversight Committee. It contains a list of academic citations focused on Artificial Intelligence, Cognitive Science, Neuroscience, and Evolutionary Psychology, ranging from 1962 to 2008. Notable authors listed include Nick Bostrom, Juergen Schmidhuber, and Daniel Dennett, reflecting Epstein's known interest in and funding of scientific research in these fields.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013152.jpg
This document discusses the potential risks and ethical challenges associated with a "hard takeoff" Artificial General Intelligence (AGI), contrasting a benevolent outcome with a catastrophic one depending on initial conditions. It argues that rigid or simplistic ethical rules will fail against a rapidly evolving superintelligence, proposing instead a sophisticated system based on nuance and empathy. The text also references Nick Bostrom's views on goal structures in superintelligence versus human mental ecology.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018428.jpg
This document is page 196 of a manuscript or book regarding the existential risks of Artificial Intelligence, specifically 'The Confinement Problem' (keeping a malicious AI contained). It cites computer scientists Butler Lampson, Vernor Vinge, and Michael Vassar, arguing that a super-intelligent AI would inevitably escape human constraints. The page bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was part of the evidence gathered during the House Oversight Committee's investigation, likely into Jeffrey Epstein's connections with the scientific community (e.g., the Edge Foundation or transhumanist circles).
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018426.jpg
This document, page 194 of a larger text (likely a book on technology or futurism), discusses the existential risks of Artificial Intelligence. It references Vernor Vinge and Nick Bostrom, specifically detailing Bostrom's 'paperclip maximizer' thought experiment to illustrate how AI could destroy humanity through resource consumption. The document bears a House Oversight stamp, indicating it was part of the discovery materials in the Epstein investigation, reflecting Epstein's known interest in transhumanism and AI research.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity