Chris R. Rodgers
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jack Scarola
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jack Scarola
|
Professional |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-01-19 | N/A | Filing of Discovery Responses in a civil matter against Epstein | Unknown (Legal Filing) | View |
EFTA00030893.pdf
This document is an email from attorney Jack Scarola dated February 13, 2021, regarding evidence in the Epstein case. Scarola attaches a photo of a victim taken around the time of her abuse and notes her recollection that critical topless photos were also taken. The document includes a standard legal disclaimer from the law firm Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
EFTA00027350.pdf
This document is an email chain from January 2021 between attorney Jack Scarola and an Assistant United States Attorney (SDNY) regarding a victim's willingness to testify in an upcoming trial (scheduled for July 12, 2021, likely the Ghislaine Maxwell trial). The correspondence focuses on the logistics of the witness's testimony, specifically her requirement that her husband and three minor children accompany her to New York. The AUSA confirms that the government (SDNY/FBI Victim Services) will fund the travel and hotel accommodations for the entire family to secure her testimony.
EFTA00024996.pdf
This document is an email thread from January 2021 involving the law firm Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. and the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS). The correspondence concerns the transmission of 'Discovery Responses' filed on behalf of a redacted female client in a civil matter against Jeffrey Epstein. The sender, Chris R. Rodgers, confirms the attachment of these legal documents.
EFTA00024995.pdf
This document is an email dated January 19, 2021, from Chris R. Rodgers to Jack Scarola and others, attaching discovery responses for a civil matter against Jeffrey Epstein. The email originates from the law firm Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. The plaintiff's name is redacted, but the email references filings made on her behalf.
EFTA00023750.pdf
This document is an email thread from September 2020 between attorney Jack Scarola and the US Attorney's Office (USANYS). The discussion concerns locating a 2009 deposition transcript from a civil case against Jeffrey Epstein ('[Redacted] vs Epstein'). Since the court reporting service and videographer could not locate the original records, Scarola provided detailed notes taken by paralegal Mike Danchuk, describing the testimony as revealing Epstein's pattern of grooming and victimization. USANYS also mentions coordinating with Epstein Estate attorneys Marc Weinstein and Andrew Tomback to obtain the transcript.
EFTA00016311.pdf
This document is an email chain from September 2020 involving attorney Jack Scarola and the US Attorney's Office (USANYS). The correspondence concerns the search for a specific deposition transcript and video from December 4, 2009, in a civil case against Jeffrey Epstein ([Redacted] vs Epstein). The court reporter and videography service confirmed they could not locate the records. Consequently, Scarola provided notes taken contemporaneously by his paralegal/investigator Mike Danchuk, noting that the witness described Epstein's pattern of recruitment and grooming.
EFTA00016304.pdf
This document is an email chain from September 2020 between attorney Jack Scarola and the US Attorney's Office (SDNY). They discuss the inability to locate the official transcript and video of a deposition from December 4, 2009, related to a case against Jeffrey Epstein. In the absence of the official record, Scarola provides contemporaneous notes taken by a paralegal, noting that they describe 'troubled young women' susceptible to Epstein's 'recruitment, grooming and victimization.'
RE: [Redacted] - Discovery Responses
Attached please find the Discovery Responses filed on [Redacted] behalf in her civil matter against Epstein.
RE: [Redacted] - Discovery Responses
Attached please find the Discovery Responses filed on [Redacted] behalf in her civil matter against Epstein.
FW: 12/04/09 [Redacted] vs Epstein Deposition Transcript
Forwarding confirmation from court reporter and videographer that records are unavailable.
FW: 12/04/09 [Redacted] vs Epstein Deposition Transcript
Forwards response from court reporter stating 'Unable to locate' and confirms video is unavailable.
RE: 12/04/09 [Redacted] vs Epstein Deposition Transcript
Confirming inability to locate Volume I of the deposition from 2009.
RE: 12/04/09 [Redacted] vs Epstein Deposition Transcript
Confirms search of records and inability to locate Volume I of the deposition from 2009.
RE: 12/04/09 [Redacted] vs Epstein Deposition Transcript
Confirming unable to locate Volume I of the deposition from 2009.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity