SDF

Location
Mentions
14
Relationships
1
Events
0
Documents
7
Also known as:
Southern District of Florida (SDFL) SDFL (Southern District of Florida)

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.
1 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
person Jeffrey Epstein
Legal representative
1
1
View
No events found for this entity.

011.pdf

This document is a letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office to Judge Richard Berman arguing for the pretrial detention of Jeffrey Epstein. The Government outlines Epstein's extreme flight risk due to his wealth (over $500 million), international ties (Paris, US Virgin Islands), and access to private aircraft (noting over 20 international flights since 2018). It also details the danger he poses to the community, citing the recent discovery of lewd photos of minors in his home and a history of witness intimidation, including specific wire transfers made to potential witnesses following negative press coverage in late 2018.

Legal correspondence (government's response to defendant's motion for pretrial release)
2025-12-26

EFTA00030230.pdf

An email chain from June 21, 2019, between a Special Assistant to the U.S. Attorney (SDNY) and another individual. The correspondence involves the transfer of critical documents related to the Epstein case, specifically a 'prosecution memo' and an 'SDFL decision' (likely referencing the Southern District of Florida's previous handling of the case), shortly before Epstein's arrest in July 2019.

Email chain
2025-12-25

EFTA00028880.pdf

This document is a Reply Memorandum filed by Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team on March 15, 2021, supporting her motion to dismiss the indictment based on the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) Jeffrey Epstein signed in Florida. Maxwell argues that the NPA's clause immunizing 'potential co-conspirators of Epstein' explicitly covers her and bars the current prosecution in the Southern District of New York. The defense contends that the government's attempt to limit the NPA geographically (to Florida) or to specific crimes is contradicted by the plain text of the agreement and legal precedent regarding plea agreements.

Legal reply memorandum (united states district court, southern district of new york)
2025-12-25

DOJ-OGR-00015869.jpg

This document is a flight log detailing multiple flight events across various dates, aircraft, and locations. It records specific flight segments, aircraft identification, miles flown, number of landings, and helicopter hours, all certified by pilot David Rodgers. The log also includes summary figures for 'Page Total', 'Amount Forward', and 'Total to Date' for different aircraft categories, likely representing cumulative flight hours.

Flight log
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00015823.jpg

This document is a pilot's flight log for February and March 1994, detailing numerous flights on an HS125-700 aircraft with tail number N900SC. The log, signed by pilot David Rodgers, records frequent trips between Teterboro, NJ (TEB) and Palm Beach, FL (PBI), along with flights to other destinations including Boston, Louisville, Santa Fe, and Columbus. The document provides a detailed record of the aircraft's movements and the pilot's flight hours during this two-month period.

Flight log
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00021834.jpg

This document is page 10 of a legal filing (Case 22-1426) dated November 1, 2024, discussing Ghislaine Maxwell's appeal. It details her argument that Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) in the Southern District of Florida (SDFL) should have barred her prosecution in the Southern District of New York (SDNY). The text also references a 2019 DOJ OPR investigation into the original handling of the Epstein case by SDFL prosecutors.

Legal brief / court filing (appellate)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00005502.jpg

This legal filing argues for the admissibility of evidence regarding the USAO-SDFL's 2008 decision not to charge Ghislaine Maxwell. It highlights inconsistencies in a redacted witness's testimony between 2007 and 2020, specifically noting that the witness only accused Maxwell of sexual contact (fondling breasts) 13 years later during an interview with the New York FBI. The document lists various evidentiary exhibits including message pad slips, phone records, and FedEx records.

Court filing / legal memorandum
2025-11-20
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
0
As Recipient
0
Total
0
No communications found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity