Mr. Horowitz
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jane Doe's 2-8
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Herman
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-03-08 | N/A | Deposition of Jeffrey Epstein where he refused to answer questions regarding Jane Doe 3. | Unknown | View |
| 2010-03-08 | N/A | Deposition of Jeffrey Epstein where he invoked 5th, 6th, and 14th Amendment rights. | Unknown (Deposition setting) | View |
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026493.jpg
This document discusses the findings of Inspector General Horowitz regarding political bias in FBI investigations involving James Comey and Peter Strzok, arguing that this bias taints the subsequent Mueller investigation. It cites legal precedents, such as *U.S. v. Russell* and *Blackledge v. Perry*, to argue that due process violations stemming from biased investigations function as "fruit of a poisonous tree," potentially invalidating convictions and indictments.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026478.jpg
This document describes findings by Inspector General Horowitz regarding anti-Trump bias among FBI officials during the 2016 election cycle, specifically within the Crossfire Hurricane and Clinton email investigations. It details concerning communications from agents like Peter Strzok and questions whether bias influenced the prioritization of the Russia inquiry over the Clinton email probe.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027745.jpg
This document contains a log of digital messages exchanged on May 25, 2019, between the email alias 'e:jeeitunes@gmail.com' (identified as Jeffrey Epstein) and a redacted individual. The conversation covers political topics including Boris Johnson, the Horowitz report, and Deutsche Bank documents, as well as travel logistics to Paris and New York. Notably, the redacted sender discusses a 'secret' project involving a wall in New Mexico near El Paso and an upcoming appearance on 'Fox and Friends' to release information about it.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010586.jpg
This document describes Jeffrey Epstein's obstruction of the discovery process in civil lawsuits filed by attorney Edwards. It details how Epstein utilized the 5th Amendment to refuse answering substantive questions regarding the sexual abuse of minors during at least five depositions. A specific transcript excerpt from March 8, 2010, is included where Epstein refuses to answer Mr. Horowitz regarding an assault on Jane Doe 3 and makes false accusations about attorney Jeffrey Herman.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013339.jpg
This document describes Jeffrey Epstein's obstruction of the legal discovery process in civil cases filed by attorney Edwards. It details how Epstein repeatedly invoked his 5th Amendment rights against self-incrimination during at least five depositions to avoid answering questions about sexual abuse. The text highlights a specific deposition on March 8, 2010, where Epstein refused to answer a question regarding Jane Doe 3 and deflected by making attacks on the opposing counsel's partners.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026274.jpg
This document, labeled for House Oversight, analyzes an Inspector General's report concerning FBI conduct during the 2016 election. It details findings of significant anti-Trump bias among key officials like Peter Strzok, suggesting this animus influenced decisions like prioritizing the 'Crossfire Hurricane' investigation over probing Hillary Clinton's emails found on Anthony Weiner's laptop. Notably, this document is about the 2016 election investigations and contains no information related to Jeffrey Epstein.
Questioning regarding abuse
Horowitz asked about abuse of Jane Doe 3; Epstein refused to answer citing constitutional amendments.
Sexual abuse inquiry
Question regarding specific abuse of Jane Doe 3 in 2004; Epstein refused to answer citing constitutional rights.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity