Mr. Markus
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
United States Attorney's Office
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
The government
|
Adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
TODD BLANCHE
|
Discussed a meeting |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Contact intermediary |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Change of legal representation | Ghislaine Maxwell relieved Cohen & Gresser as counsel and is now represented by Mr. Markus. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Publication | An Op-Ed was published in a local newspaper, which contained an overture to jurors and allegedly ... | local newspaper | View |
| N/A | N/A | Meeting with Mr. Markus | N/A | View |
| 2021-06-30 | Publication | Mr. Markus authored an Op-Ed in the New York Daily News comparing the defendant to Bill Cosby. | N/A | View |
DOJ-OGR-00022658.tif
This document is a transcript from an interview or deposition involving Ghislaine Maxwell, Todd Blanche, and Spencer Horn. Maxwell discusses her first meeting with Mr. Epstein in 1991, her move to America in 1990, her work for her father including launching a newspaper and acquiring others, and a potential meeting with Donald Trump through her father. She also states her willingness to speak with the government about her case and Mr. Epstein, noting that no government officials had contacted her until her indictment.
DOJ-OGR-00022397.tif
This document is a page from a legal transcript, likely a deposition or court proceeding, where the speakers are discussing legal procedures concerning witness testimony and cross-examination. It includes a reference to a past meeting in July 2025 between Ms. Wax and Ms. Maxwell, and a current discussion involving Todd Blanche, Ghislaine Maxwell, and a Mr. Markus regarding a recent meeting.
DOJ-OGR-00001369.jpg
This legal document, dated April 15, 2021, is a motion filed by attorney Christian R. Everdell on behalf of the law firm Cohen & Gresser LLP. The firm requests to be relieved as counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell in her appeals, stating that she has retained new counsel, Mr. Markus. The document also notes that the government, represented by Assistant U.S. Attorney Maurene Comey, does not oppose this change in representation.
DOJ-OGR-00004809.jpg
This legal document, filed on July 1, 2021, is a letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York to Judge Alison J. Nathan. The government requests that the Court issue an order compelling Mr. Markus (presumably defense counsel) to comply with Local Rule 23.1 regarding trial publicity. The letter argues that an Op-Ed published by Mr. Markus and his continued comments violate a previous court order and are likely to interfere with the Court's ability to conduct a fair trial with an impartial jury.
DOJ-OGR-00004808.jpg
This legal document, filed by the Government on July 1, 2021, to Judge Alison J. Nathan, argues that statements made to the media by defense appellate counsel, Mr. Markus, violate Local Rule 23.1. The filing specifically cites a recent Op-Ed where Markus compared his client's case to Bill Cosby's, arguing these extrajudicial comments are designed to prejudice potential jurors and interfere with a fair trial. The Government asserts that relief is warranted to prevent further prejudicial statements.
No Subject
Mr. Markus reached out to Ghislaine Maxwell because she wanted to speak with the government about her case and Mr. Epstein.
Notice of Mailing of Order dated 7/30/21
A copy of the court order dated 7/30/21 was emailed to Mr. Markus.
Notice of Mailing of Order dated 7/30/21
A copy of the order from 07/30/2021 (dkt. 315) was emailed to Mr. Markus.
Comparison of defendant's case to Bill Cosby's
Mr. Markus authored an Op-Ed in the New York Daily News comparing the defendant to Bill Cosby, arguing the case should be dismissed, and calling the case 'extremely weak'.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity