| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Dr. William Sybers
|
Spouse |
7
|
2 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1991-05-30 | N/A | Death of Kay Sybers. | Sybers home | View |
This document appears to be a page from a manuscript drafted by Alan Dershowitz (indicated by the header date and style) discussing the legal appeal of Dr. Sybers. It details the legal strategy employed by Dershowitz and his brother, Nathan, focusing on challenging the scientific evidence and lab practices (including the FBI lab) used to convict Sybers. The text concludes with the mention of the court reversing the conviction.
This document appears to be page 185 of a manuscript or legal narrative describing the prosecution of Dr. William Sybers. It details how State Attorney Harry Shorstein pursued Sybers for the murder of his wife, Kay, initially relying on a 'junk science' theory involving potassium before shifting to a theory involving succinylcholine (SMC) validated by the FBI lab. The text highlights the legal maneuvering, the role of the FBI in validating the forensic evidence, and the eventual indictment on February 18, 1997.
This document appears to be a page from a draft manuscript (dated 2012) written by an attorney (likely Alan Dershowitz based on context) regarding the legal case of Dr. William Sybers. The text details the background of the case, where Dr. Sybers was convicted of killing his wife, Kay, with succinylcholine in 1991. It discusses the initial investigation, the suspicious circumstances involving a missing syringe and an affair, and the subsequent suicide of the couple's son, Tim.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity