| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
JE
|
Traveled together |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-07-09 | N/A | Jes Staley refers to a recent interaction as 'fun' and asks Epstein to 'Say hi to Snow White'. | Unknown | View |
An email exchange between Jeffrey Epstein and Jes Staley from July 9-10, 2010. Staley remarks 'That was fun. Say hi to Snow White' and mentions potential tracking. Epstein responds asking 'what character would you like next', to which Staley replies 'Beauty and the Beast.....', and Epstein retorts 'well one side is availble'.
This document is a flight log detailing aircraft movements and passenger manifests for various flights between April and July 2001. It includes flight dates, aircraft tail numbers (N505LS, N909JE), departure and arrival locations, flight numbers, and lists of passengers which frequently include individuals identified as 'JE' and 'GM', along with other named and unnamed individuals (e.g., 'FEMALE'). The log also contains a signature from 'David Ridge' as the pilot.
This legal document, part of a court filing dated December 17, 2021, outlines the legal principles guiding the court's analysis of the government's investigation into Ms. Maxwell. It references precedents from the Second Circuit and the Supreme Court to establish rules regarding investigative techniques, challenges to government motives, and the admissibility of evidence related to charging decisions.
This document is page 5 of a 34-page legal filing (Document 35 in case 1:19-cr-00830-AT), filed on April 24, 2020. It serves as a table of authorities, listing numerous legal cases cited within the main document, such as United States v. Payne and United States v. Pelullo. Each entry includes the full legal citation and the page number(s) where the case is referenced in the filing.
This document is page 24 of a legal filing (Document 380) from October 29, 2021, in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (1:20-cr-00330). The text is a legal argument citing multiple precedents (Boyle, Rodriguez, Hill, Watts, Carneglia) to support the exclusion of evidence related to the government's charging decisions. The argument asserts that such evidence is hearsay, irrelevant, and potentially confusing to jurors.
This legal document, filed on February 4, 2021, is an argument from the defense demanding the immediate production of unredacted reports from the government. The defense contends these reports, held by the FBI, contain exculpatory 'Brady material' and that the government cannot fulfill its disclosure obligations by providing redacted versions. The argument is supported by citations to legal precedents, including Kyles v. Whitley, and a prior ruling from the court on the timing of such disclosures.
A biographical profile page for designer Todd Oldham featuring a headshot and a summary of his career in fashion, interior design, and publishing. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it is part of a larger evidence collection, likely related to the investigation, though no direct link to Jeffrey Epstein is explicit in the text of this specific page.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity