Trove
Sign In Sign Up

Concepcion

Person
Mentions
8
Relationships
1
Events
1
Documents
4
Search

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.

Event Timeline

Interactive Timeline: Hover over events to see details. Events are arranged chronologically and alternate between top and bottom for better visibility.
1 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
location United States
Legal representative
6
2
View
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
1992-01-01 Legal case United States v. Concepcion, 983 F.2d 369 (2d Cir. 1992) 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals View

DOJ-OGR-00003127.jpg

This document is a page from a legal filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) arguing for the admissibility of evidence. It cites numerous Second Circuit precedents to establish that 'uncharged criminal conduct' is admissible in conspiracy cases when it explains the relationship between coconspirators or completes the story of the crime, rather than merely showing bad character. The text focuses on Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b).

Court filing / legal memorandum
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00002947.jpg

This document is page 13 (pagination xii) of a court filing (Document 204) in Case 1:20-cr-00330 (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on April 16, 2021. It is a 'Table of Authorities' listing previous legal cases (legal precedents) cited elsewhere in the full brief, predominantly from the Second Circuit Court of Appeals and the Southern District of New York.

Court filing - table of authorities
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00005743.jpg

This document is a page from a legal filing, specifically page 6 of 8 from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on October 29, 2021. It outlines the legal standard for challenging the admissibility of identification testimony, citing several precedents like Raheem v. Kelly and Simmons v. United States. The text explains the two-part inquiry courts must use to determine if a pretrial identification procedure was unduly suggestive and, if so, whether the identification is still independently reliable based on factors established in Neil v. Biggers.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00005740.jpg

This document is a 'Table of Authorities' from a legal filing in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on October 29, 2021. It lists seven U.S. court cases, dating from 1967 to 2012, which are cited as legal precedent in the associated legal brief. The cases are from the U.S. Supreme Court and the Second Circuit Court of Appeals.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
0
As Recipient
0
Total
0
No communications found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity

Back to Search