Ricco
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Bruce Barket
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Bruce Barket
|
Co counsel defense team |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Bruce Barket
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-26 | N/A | Proposed meeting to discuss legal briefing schedule. | Unknown | View |
| 2019-09-01 | N/A | Meeting between defense counsel (Barket) and US Attorney's office to discuss briefing schedule. | Not specified | View |
| 1977-01-01 | Legal case | United States v. Ricco, 549 F.2d 264, 272 (2d Cir. 1977) | 2d Cir. | View |
EFTA00030995.pdf
This document is an email chain from August 20-22, 2020, involving defense attorney Bruce Barket and the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS). The subject concerns a letter regarding 'jail conditions and court appearance,' specifically citing 'COVID stuff at MCC' (Metropolitan Correctional Center). The USANYS staff discusses coordinating a response to Judge Karas by the following Monday.
EFTA00030552.pdf
An email chain from November 2019 between defense attorney Bruce Barket and the US Attorney's Office (SDNY). Barket requests statements made by inmate Nicholas Tartaglione and video footage regarding Jeffrey Epstein's attempted suicide on July 22-23, 2019. The US Attorney's Office agrees to produce Tartaglione's statements but explicitly denies the request for the suicide attempt video and reports, claiming they are not relevant to the case.
EFTA00028448.pdf
Email correspondence between defense attorney Bruce Barket and government prosecutors regarding conditions at the MCC for client 'Nick' (Nicholas Tartaglione). The emails discuss requests to inspect the cell and physical evidence related to the 'July 23rd suicide attempt' (referencing the incident involving Jeffrey Epstein), complaints about extreme heat in the unit, and difficulties securing family visits for the client facing the death penalty.
EFTA00026669.pdf
Legal correspondence from July 5, 2019, between attorney Bruce Barket and MCC New York staff regarding his client 'Nick' (likely Nicholas Tartaglione). Barket complains that Nick was moved to the SHU (Special Housing Unit) over a cell phone allegation, where he faces a leaking toilet and the loss of personal property and privileged legal documents. An MCC Staff Attorney responds that they inspected the previous cell on '5 North', found some papers and books, and returned relevant items to the inmate.
EFTA00026640.pdf
This document is an email chain involving Bruce Barket (attorney for Nicholas Tartaglione, referred to as 'Nick') and staff at the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) and the Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC). Barket complains that his client was placed in the SHU due to an alleged cell phone possession, citing poor conditions (leaking toilet) and the seizure of privileged legal documents. The government attorneys correspond to schedule a call to discuss the SHU conditions and the cell phone issue. This correspondence occurs in July 2019, shortly before/during the time Jeffrey Epstein was incarcerated at MCC.
EFTA00023680.pdf
This document is an email chain from August 20-21, 2020, involving attorney Bruce Barket of Barket Epstein Kearon Aldea & LoTurco, LLP and the US Attorney's Office (Narcotics Unit). The subject concerns a 'Letter regarding jail conditions and court appearance' and a 'Continued Inhumane Prison' attachment sent to Judge Karas. The USANYS Co-Chief of the Narcotics Unit requests an urgent call to discuss the matter, citing a Monday deadline.
EFTA00021347.pdf
An email thread from September 2019 between defense attorneys (Bruce Barket and Tony Ricco) and Assistant U.S. Attorneys regarding scheduling a meeting to discuss legal proceedings. Tony Ricco mentions submitting a schedule for 'penalty phase pleadings' in compliance with ABA Guidelines. The group attempts to coordinate a meeting time for the following week, likely Thursday or Friday.
EFTA00021330.pdf
This document is an email dated September 20, 2019, from attorney Bruce A. Barket to redacted recipients, copied to Tony Ricco and Michael Bachrach. The email discusses setting up a meeting to propose a briefing schedule, aiming to finalize their schedule by the following Tuesday. The document includes a standard legal confidentiality disclaimer and Bates number EFTA00021330.
EFTA00020127.pdf
This document is an email chain dated August 12, 2019, shortly after Jeffrey Epstein's death. Attorney Bruce Barket writes to the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) asserting that his client, Mr. Tartaglione (presumably Epstein's cellmate), must not be questioned regarding Epstein's suicide or the associated FBI/IG investigations without counsel present. Assistant US Attorney Maurene responds, noting that she and 'Jason' are not handling the death investigation but will forward the request to the appropriate prosecutors.
EFTA00019900.pdf
This document is an email chain between attorney Aida Leisenring and the US Attorney's Office (USANYS) regarding the preservation of video surveillance from the MCC. Leisenring requested footage from the hallway outside her client Tartaglione's cell covering the 'Epstein incident' on July 22-23, 2019. In December 2019, Leisenring expressed surprise that the video was not retained despite her earlier request and confirmation from officials.
EFTA00019694.pdf
This document is an email chain from September 20-21, 2019, primarily involving attorney Bruce Barket of Barket Epstein Kearon Aldea & LoTurco, LLP, and an Assistant United States Attorney. The discussion concerns scheduling a meeting to propose a briefing schedule. The AUSA suggests meeting 'next Friday' to allow time for internal discussion and conferring with a redacted party.
EFTA00015994.pdf
This document is an email chain from November 2019 between attorney Bruce Barket and the US Attorney's Office (USANYS). The correspondence concerns a discovery request for statements made by inmate Mr. Tartaglione regarding Jeffrey Epstein's attempted suicide on July 22-23, 2019. While the USANYS agreed to produce reports of Tartaglione's statements, they explicitly refused to produce reports and video of the attempted suicide itself, deeming them irrelevant to the current case.
EFTA00015932.pdf
This document is an email chain between defense attorneys (Michael Bachrach and Bruce Barket) and the US Attorney's Office (USANYS). The attorneys are requesting records of statements made by inmate Mr. Tartaglione regarding Jeffrey Epstein's reported suicide attempt on July 22-23, 2019. The defense argues this is 'Rule 16' discovery material relevant to a 'penalty phase' (likely Tartaglione's capital case), while the government discusses the procedural requirements (Touhy regulations vs. Rule 16).
EFTA00010427.pdf
This document is an email chain from August 2020 between the US Attorney's Office (USANYS), the Chambers of Judge Karas (NYSD), and defense attorney Bruce Barket of the firm Barket Epstein Kearon Aldea & LoTurco, LLP. The correspondence concerns the submission of letters regarding jail conditions (specifically at the MCC) and court appearances pursuant to a court order. The emails indicate coordination between the defense, the prosecution (Narcotics Unit), and the Judge regarding filings and memo endorsements.
DOJ-OGR-00009598.jpg
This legal document outlines the Second Circuit's stringent standard for pre-indictment delay, which requires a defendant to prove both improper government purpose and serious, actual prejudice to their defense. It cites numerous legal precedents to emphasize the heavy burden on the defendant and to define substantial prejudice, noting that the mere loss of evidence or witnesses is typically insufficient. The document establishes that claims of pre-indictment delay are rarely successful.
DOJ-OGR-00002955.jpg
This document is page 21 of a Table of Authorities from a legal filing (Document 204) in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, which corresponds to the trial of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The page lists various legal precedents (case law citations) ranging from 'United States v. Rahimi' to 'United States v. Rosa' used to support legal arguments in the main brief. The document bears the Bates stamp DOJ-OGR-00002955.
Re: proposed schedule.
Stating any day next week works; mentions submitting schedule for penalty phase pleadings over the weekend.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity