DSK
PersonRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
DSK's Daughter
|
Family |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Alleged sexual assault involving DSK and a victim. | Bedroom/Shower area | View |
| N/A | N/A | Photograph taken of defendant following arrest while examined by doctors for bruises. | Unknown medical/police faci... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Lunch between DSK and his daughter (withdrawn alibi). | Unknown | View |
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019478.jpg
This document is a bibliography page listing works 'Also by Edward Jay Epstein' (an investigative journalist, distinct from Jeffrey Epstein). It lists various non-fiction titles covering topics such as the Warren Commission, Armand Hammer, and Hollywood economics. The page bears a footer indicating a print date of September 29, 2016, and a Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019478', suggesting it was included in documents produced for the House Oversight Committee.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017336.jpg
A page from a draft manuscript (dated April 2, 2012) bearing a House Oversight Bates stamp. The text, written in the first person by an experienced defense attorney (likely Alan Dershowitz given the context of Tyson/DSK analysis), compares the evidence in the Dominique Strauss-Kahn and Mike Tyson cases, arguing the DSK case was stronger despite being dropped. The author then recounts a specific anecdote from early in their career in Provincetown, MA, where a man falsely accused a 'black man wearing a shark tooth' of rape to cover up a consensual homosexual encounter from his fiancé.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017335.jpg
This document appears to be a draft of a legal argument or an internal memo regarding the sexual assault case against Dominique Strauss-Kahn (DSK). It outlines the prosecution's narrative versus the defense's claim of consensual sex, arguing that the defense's theory is implausible given the physical evidence (DNA on undergarments) and the physical description of the defendant. The document carries a House Oversight stamp, suggesting it was part of a larger document production.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity