| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | End of deposition session / Break | Unknown | View |
| N/A | Deposition/legal proceeding | Questioning of Ms. Maxwell regarding her responsibility for a journal in 2004-2005. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Recess | A break was taken during the proceeding from 4:39 to 4:54. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Recess in deposition proceedings | Deposition room (unspecifie... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Video Record Recess | Deposition Room (Time: 4:01... | View |
| 2009-09-17 | N/A | Presence of court reporter, videographer, Mr. Hill (for C.M.A.), Adam Langino (for B.B.), and Wil... | Deposition location | View |
This document is a page from a legal transcript dated December 9, 2021, detailing the questioning of G. Maxwell. After a brief recess, Maxwell is asked about her responsibility for a journal in 2004-2005, to which her attorney, Mr. Pagliuca, objects. Maxwell then states she does not know the author or contents of the document being presented.
This document is page 132 of a rough draft deposition transcript marked with a House Oversight Bates stamp. It captures the end of a questioning session where Mr. Simpson asks a witness if an adverse inference can be drawn solely from being on an airplane with a 24-year-old woman, to which the witness replies 'obviously not.' The session concludes at 4:31 p.m. with the attorneys agreeing to discuss logistics for the following day off the record.
A page from a legal transcript where a witness discusses providing information relevant to the sexual abuse of underage girls. The witness becomes emotional, requests a break, and upon returning, expresses a desire to effectively support Virginia Roberts with evidence.
This is a page from a rough draft deposition transcript involving an inquiry related to Virginia Roberts. The witness (likely an attorney for Roberts) requests a break to consult with counsel to avoid inadvertently waiving attorney/client privilege. After a 12-minute recess (2:13 p.m. to 2:25 p.m.), attorney Mr. Scarola places on the record that they are asserting both attorney/client and common interest privilege regarding the source of information in question.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity