Trove
Sign In Sign Up

Judge Berman

Person
Mentions
102
Relationships
15
Events
57
Documents
51
Search

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.

Event Timeline

Interactive Timeline: Hover over events to see details. Events are arranged chronologically and alternate between top and bottom for better visibility.
15 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
person Jeffrey Epstein
Judicial
7
3
View
person Kate
Professional
5
1
View
person Unknown Speaker
Judicial
5
1
View
person Assistant U.S. Attorney
Legal representative
4
4
View
person Jeffrey Epstein
Legal representative
3
3
View
person Assistant United States Attorney
Legal representative
2
2
View
person Jeffrey Epstein
Judge defendant
1
1
View
person Assistant U.S. Attorney
Judicial
1
1
View
person The Warden
Professional judicial
1
1
View
person DOJ
Professional conflict
1
1
View
person Epstein
Subject presiding judge
1
1
View
person Hon. Henry B. Pitman
Business associate
1
1
View
person Jeffrey Epstein
Defendant judge
1
1
View
person Professor Bruce Green
Legal representative
1
1
View
person Cameron Douglas
Judge defendant
1
1
View
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
2019-07-31 N/A Scheduled status/scheduling conference Southern District of New York View
2019-07-31 N/A Conference before Judge Berman regarding Epstein Court View
2019-07-31 N/A Conference before Judge Berman. Court View
2019-07-31 N/A Status hearing for Jeffrey Epstein Court Room 17B View
2019-07-18 N/A Bail Decision Hearing New York, N.Y. View
2019-07-18 N/A Detention hearing for Jeffrey Epstein (Case# 19 Cr. 490 (RMB)) Court Room 17B View
2019-07-16 N/A Filing of Government's supplemental detention submission and exhibits on ECF. Southern District of New Yo... View
2019-07-16 Meeting Counsel and Mr. Epstein are instructed to meet with Judge Berman in his courtroom immediately fol... Courtroom 17B View
2019-07-16 N/A Bail argument for Jeffrey Epstein Judge Berman's Courtroom (S... View
2019-07-15 N/A Bail Hearing for Jeffrey Epstein US District Court, SDNY View
2019-07-15 N/A In-court hearing regarding release/remand SDNY View
2019-07-15 N/A Scheduled Bail Hearing SDNY View
2019-07-15 N/A Detention Hearing for Jeffrey Epstein Court Room 17B, SDNY View
2019-07-15 N/A Detention Hearing held. Southern District of New York View
2019-07-15 N/A Court appearance scheduled at 10:00 am. Court View
2019-07-15 N/A Court argument where the government made arguments regarding detention. SDNY Court View
2019-07-15 N/A Detention hearing in U.S. v. Jeffrey Epstein Courtroom 17B, 500 Pearl St... View
2019-07-15 N/A Filing of letter requesting speedy trial time exclusion Southern District of New York View
2019-07-15 N/A Government request for exclusion of speedy trial time submitted to Judge Berman's chambers. Southern District of New York View
2019-07-15 N/A In-court hearing regarding bail Southern District of New York View
2019-07-12 N/A Judge Berman denied the government's request for extra time to review Epstein's financial disclos... Southern District of New York View
2019-07-12 N/A Government filed reply in support of detention memo and opposition to defendant's motion for bail. Southern District of New York View
2019-07-12 N/A Bail hearing for Epstein N/A View
2019-07-11 N/A Deadline for Epstein defense bail submission Berman (Court) View
2019-07-08 N/A Arrest of Jeffrey Epstein United States (upon arrival... View

EFTA00018183.pdf

An email chain from July 12, 2019, between officials at the Southern District of New York regarding Jeffrey Epstein's financial disclosure. An Assistant U.S. Attorney notes that Judge Berman denied their request for extra time to review the submission, quoting the judge's sarcastic docket note stating it is 'Hard to imagine it would take the Govt extra time to review submission.'

Email
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00016136.pdf

This document is a formal legal letter dated August 1, 2019, from Jeffrey Epstein's defense counsel (Steptoe & Johnson LLP) to the U.S. Attorney's Office for the SDNY. The letter requests extensive discovery materials including the specific identities of 'dozens of minor girls' and 'employees' mentioned in the indictment, flight logs ('use of Mr. Epstein's planes'), massage schedules, and visitor logs. The defense also requests 'Brady material' (exculpatory evidence), specifically seeking evidence to support defenses that Epstein believed victims were over 18, that victims deceived him about their age, and that payments were gifts rather than for sex acts.

Legal correspondence / discovery request (steptoe & johnson llp to usao sdny)
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00015634.pdf

This document is an email thread from July 11, 2019, primarily between reporter Juliet Papa (1010 WINS) and a redacted official (likely from the US Attorney's Office). Papa inquires about a rumored court appearance for Jeffrey Epstein that day. The official clarifies there is no appearance that day, but there is one scheduled for the following Monday at 10:00 AM before Judge Berman, and notes that a defense brief is due that day with the prosecution's response due the next day.

Email thread
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00015606.pdf

This document is a court transcript from a conference, initial appearance, arraignment, and bail hearing for Jeffrey Epstein on July 8, 2019, before Magistrate Judge Henry B. Pitman. Epstein is charged with sex trafficking conspiracy and substantive sex trafficking offenses, to which he pled not guilty. The government argued for his detention due to extraordinary risk of flight and danger, citing a years-long scheme to sexually abuse underage girls.

Court transcript
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00015348.pdf

This document is an internal email from the SDNY Press Office dated July 12, 2019, providing draft press guidance for the upcoming Monday, July 15 detention hearing of Jeffrey Epstein. The guidance details the time and location of the hearing before Judge Berman and notes the charges against Epstein: sex trafficking of minors and conspiracy to commit sex trafficking of minors. The email includes an attachment titled 'Jeffrey_Epstein_indictment_PR.pdf'.

Email / press guidance
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00015345.pdf

This document is an email from attorney Robert Y. Lewis of The Marsh Law Firm to prosecutors (including a Mr. Pecorino) regarding the upcoming trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (USA v. Maxwell). Lewis requests information on admission protocols for his client, a redacted victim of Epstein and Maxwell who previously gave a victim impact statement in 2019, to attend the trial scheduled for November 29, 2021.

Email
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00015132.pdf

This document is an email chain from October 2021 between employees of the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (SDNY). They are verifying financial records regarding travel expenses (flights and hotels) paid by the SDNY for victims or witnesses to attend an Epstein-related hearing before Judge Berman in August 2019 and for travel in September 2021. The emails reference a specific E-Ticket receipt from August 26, 2019.

Email chain
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00014606.pdf

An email dated July 16, 2019, from an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of New York to Judge Berman. The email serves to provide courtesy copies of the Government's supplemental submission regarding Jeffrey Epstein's detention, including redacted public filings and unredacted versions requested to be filed under seal.

Email / legal correspondence
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00014560.pdf

This document contains a chain of emails from July 2019 between Jeffrey Epstein's defense attorney, Marc Fernich, and the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York. The correspondence primarily concerns the coordination of returning personal items (cash, effects) seized from Epstein during his arrest, while the government explicitly states they are retaining his electronic devices pursuant to a search warrant. The emails also reference the submission of a government bail memorandum to Judges Pitman and Berman.

Email correspondence / legal communication
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00014471.pdf

This document is an email thread from July 16, 2019, involving Assistant United States Attorneys for the Southern District of New York (SDNY). The discussion concerns a detention submission for Jeffrey Epstein (referenced as 'JE' in the attachment). A key point in the thread is that an AUSA contacted Judge Berman's chambers and was informed that the Judge did not want to see photographs, leading the prosecution to decide not to bring them.

Email thread
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00014345.pdf

This document is an email chain from August 19, 2019, involving the Southern District of New York (SDNY) Assistant U.S. Attorney's office. The emails discuss and confirm the filing of a 'nolle prosequi' motion in the case U.S. v. Epstein (19 Cr. 490), effectively dismissing the indictment following Jeffrey Epstein's death. The correspondence includes a submission to Judge Berman's chambers, with defense attorneys Martin Weinberg and Michael Miller copied.

Email chain / legal correspondence
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00011024.pdf

An email chain from September 4, 2019, between Audrey Strauss and a redacted Co-Chief of the Public Corruption Unit at the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York. The correspondence confirms that exchanged letters between Professor Bruce Green and Judge Berman regarding case 19 Cr. 490 (the Epstein case) have been docketed.

Email
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00001082.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript dated April 1, 2021, where an attorney is arguing against their client being a flight risk. The attorney distinguishes their client's case from the U.S. v. Zarger case cited by the government, noting their client was in New Hampshire at the time of arrest and not making plans to leave the country. The attorney also references a prior felony conviction of a Mr. Epstein and a previous proceeding before Judge Berman.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00001077.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 21-770, dated April 1, 2021) recording an argument against granting bail to the defendant (identified by case number as Ghislaine Maxwell). The speaker argues that the defendant has been untruthful about her finances, claiming ignorance of her own wealth ('millions of dollars'), and poses a flight risk involving potential foreign travel documents. The prosecution explicitly compares her situation to the case of Jeffrey Epstein, citing Judge Berman's decision to deny Epstein bail based on flight risk and dangerousness.

Court transcript (bail hearing argument)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00000744.jpg

This is the final page of a legal filing in the Epstein case (1:19-cr-00490) submitted by Kel McClanahan, counsel for MSW Media. The filing argues that the Court should not issue an opinion on the Government's redaction of non-victim PII, as this could negatively influence a separate pending FOIA case. It notes that the Government does not oppose MSW Media's intervention and that the author did not consult with the former defendant's (Epstein's) representatives. The header date appears to contain a typo (reading '25' instead of '19').

Legal filing / court motion (page 4 of 4)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00000704.jpg

This document is page 66 of a court transcript filed on September 3, 2019, related to Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB (United States v. Jeffrey Epstein). It contains a victim impact statement where an unnamed survivor addresses Judge Berman, discussing the trauma of silence, the need for justice over money and power, and expressing gratitude to the judge, the public, and fellow survivors.

Court transcript / victim impact statement
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00000698.jpg

This document is a court transcript from September 3, 2019, containing a victim's impact statement. The speaker recounts being taken by an acquaintance named Rena to Jeffrey Epstein's mansion on the Upper East Side, where she was sexually assaulted by both of them. The victim describes her feelings of betrayal and concludes by identifying as a survivor and thanking Judge Berman for the opportunity to speak.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00000429.jpg

This court transcript, filed on July 16, 2019, documents a judge scheduling a continued detention hearing for a defendant, Mr. Epstein, on July 11. The court orders Mr. Epstein to remain detained and directs him and his counsel, Mr. Weingarten, to see Judge Berman in courtroom 17B immediately. The transcript also includes a clarification from Mr. Weingarten that there is no statutory rape charge due to a lack of penetration.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00000425.jpg

This document is a transcript from a court hearing on July 16, 2019, concerning Mr. Epstein. The judge (THE COURT) and a defense attorney, Mr. Weingarten, discuss the scheduling of a detention hearing. They agree to schedule the hearing for the upcoming Thursday, in accordance with the three-day continuance allowed by the Bail Reform Act, with the expectation that it will be held before Judge Berman.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018423.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Kate. The questioning establishes a timeline of events following the death of Jeffrey Epstein: Kate made a public statement in a courthouse at the invitation of Judge Berman, met with the government for the first time on that same day, and subsequently appeared on television. The transcript also confirms that during her public statement, Kate spoke about Jeffrey Epstein but not about Ghislaine Maxwell.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00001955.jpg

This document is a transcript from a legal proceeding where an attorney argues for their client, likely concerning bail. The attorney refutes the government's claim that the client is a flight risk by distinguishing the current case from precedents like 'U.S. v. Zarger' and a prior case involving a 'Mr. Epstein', emphasizing that their client was in New Hampshire at the time of arrest and not making plans to flee.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00001954.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript dated December 10, 2020. An attorney, Mr. Cohen, makes his final points to the judge, arguing against the government's reliance on the 'U.S. v. Epstein' case. Cohen contends that the Epstein case was primarily about 'dangerousness,' a legal issue not being pursued by the government in the current matter, making the precedent inapplicable.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00001950.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript of a bail hearing, dated December 10, 2020. A prosecutor argues against granting bail, stating the defendant is not being candid about her extensive financial resources and that surrendering passports is insufficient to prevent flight risk. The prosecutor cites the case of Jeffrey Epstein, as decided by Judge Berman, as a relevant precedent for denying bail on grounds of flight risk and dangerousness.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00010531.jpg

This document is page 2 of a legal filing by defense attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, dated June 21, 2022. The defense argues that the sentencing hearing should not be an 'open forum' for alleged victims who were not part of the trial record, specifically naming Ms. Ransome and Ms. Stein as individuals who should not qualify as 'crime victims' under the CVRA for this specific case. The letter distinguishes Maxwell's case from the abatement of the Epstein case and requests advance notice of who will be permitted to speak at sentencing.

Legal filing / letter to court (defense sentencing submission)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00010528.jpg

This legal document is a letter dated June 14, 2022, from MARSH law firm pllc to Judge Alison J. Nathan. The firm, representing sex trafficking victims Sarah Ransome and Elizabeth Stein, formally requests that the two women be allowed to speak at the upcoming sentencing of Ghislaine Maxwell on June 28, 2022. The request is supported by a citation from the Crime Victims' Rights Act, asserting their right to be heard.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
0
As Recipient
2
Total
2

Death Notification

From: Warden/Staff
To: Judge Berman

Judge Berman notified at 10:00 am.

Notification
2019-08-10
Communication Source

Death Notification

From: institution staff
To: Judge Berman

Judge Berman notified

Notification
2019-08-10
Communication Source

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity

Back to Search