This document contains several newspaper clippings from The Palm Beach Post in late July and early August 2006, detailing Jeffrey Epstein's arrest and indictment for soliciting prostitution. The articles cover his booking, release on bond, his attorney Jack Goldberger's claims of a 'distorted view' from police, and background information on Epstein's properties, social connections, and past legal troubles. The clippings also mention the involvement of State Attorney Barry Krischer and Palm Beach Police Chief Michael Reiter in the case.
This document contains a sworn statement from Juan P. Alessi dated November 21, 2005, detailing his experiences working for Jeffrey Epstein, particularly focusing on Ghislaine Maxwell's role as manager of Epstein's global households and his girlfriend. It also includes a letter from the Town of Palm Beach Police Department Chief Michael S. Reiter to State Attorney Barry E. Krischer dated May 1, 2006, transmitting investigation documents related to Epstein, Sarah Kellen, and Haley Robson, and expressing strong concerns about the State Attorney's office's handling of the cases.
This document is a response filed by Palm Beach Newspapers, Inc. (The Palm Beach Post) to an emergency petition for writ of certiorari by Jeffrey Epstein. The Post argues that the trial court correctly unsealed a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) and its addendum related to Epstein's solicitation of minors, asserting that the documents were improperly sealed in the first instance and that no valid legal basis exists for their continued closure.
This document is a formal legal opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirming the conviction and 240-month prison sentence of Ghislaine Maxwell for sex trafficking and related offenses. The court rejected Maxwell's appeal on five grounds, including arguments regarding a non-prosecution agreement, statute of limitations, juror misconduct, jury instructions, and sentencing reasonableness. The document also includes a subsequent order from November 2024 denying Maxwell's petition for panel rehearing or rehearing en banc.
This document is a legal response filed by the Co-Executors of Jeffrey Epstein's estate (Indyke and Kahn) on March 29, 2021, opposing the US Virgin Islands Government's appeal regarding their failed motion to intervene in probate proceedings. The executors argue the Government's petition is untimely as the original motion was denied over a year prior, and that the Government's emergency motion regarding estate assets is moot because the estate has replenished the Victims' Compensation Program funds. Attached exhibits include the original 2020 opposition brief and a March 2021 press release confirming the sale of Epstein's NYC and Palm Beach properties to fund the compensation program.
Plaintiff Jane Doe filed an emergency motion to hold Jeffrey Epstein in contempt for failing to comply with discovery orders in a civil case (08-CV-80893). The motion alleges that Epstein failed to produce state criminal discovery materials and provided only heavily redacted correspondence with the U.S. Attorney's Office, obscuring the defense counsel's side of the communications. Doe seeks immediate production of unredacted documents, sanctions of $5,000 against Epstein's counsel, and a ruling that withheld materials be deemed admissible at trial.
This document is a Motion for a Protective Order filed by plaintiff M.J. on November 11, 2010, requesting the court bar Jeffrey Epstein from direct or indirect contact. The motion details a pattern of Epstein using private investigators to harass and intimidate victims and witnesses, specifically citing an incident on July 1, 2010, where a PI named Thaddeus Knowles followed 'Jane Doe' and flashed lights into her home. It also references Epstein's intimidation of other witnesses including Sarah Kellen, Leslie Groff, and Alfredo Rodriguez, and his history of violating no-contact orders.
This document is a legal filing (Counts 108 through 156 of a larger complaint) from Case 9:09-cv-81092-KAM, filed on July 24, 2009, in the Southern District of Florida. Plaintiff L.M. alleges that Jeffrey Epstein committed multiple federal sexual offenses against her, including coercion, prostitution, and sex trafficking of a minor, occurring repeatedly between October 2004 and October 2005. The document concludes with a civil cover sheet demanding a jury trial and damages in excess of $1,000,000.
This document is a Reply Memorandum filed by Jeffrey Epstein's legal team on August 20, 2009, in the case of Jane Doe No. 8 v. Jeffrey Epstein. The defense argues that the plaintiff's claims of 'Sexual Assault and Battery' (Count I) and 'Coercion and Enticement' (Count III) should be dismissed because they are barred by the statute of limitations. Epstein's lawyers contend that because the plaintiff was aware of the injury at the time of the alleged incident in 2001 (when she was 16) and turned 18 in 2003, the time limits for filing suit (4 years and 6 years respectively) had expired by the time the complaint was filed in 2009.
This document is an internal FBI email dated October 9, 2021, transmitting records obtained from the Palm Beach Police Department (PBPD). The attachments refer to a 'Trash Pull' investigation, specifically referencing a file dated November 6, 2006 ('11.6.06'), which corresponds to the initial investigation into Jeffrey Epstein. The email notes that an individual named Paul received these records on the day of the email.
This document is an email dated October 26, 2021, transmitting 'new serials' (investigative records) and attachments. The attachments include materials from the Palm Beach Police Department (PBPD), subpoenas, expense reimbursements for a trial, and historical evidence such as a 2006 trash pull. One specific attachment is titled 'Accusations of Rape and human trafficking'.
An internal FBI email dated February 18, 2025, from a Special Agent in the Baltimore/Delaware Violent Crime Safe Streets Task Force to an FBI agent in New York. The email clarifies the origins and trial usage of three key items: a 'Masseuses' list found on Epstein's digital device in Manhattan (not used in the Maxwell trial), the 'black book' seized by Miami-Palm Beach authorities, and flight logs provided by Epstein's pilot. It explicitly notes that names on the masseuse list are believed to include minors contacted by Epstein and Maxwell.
This document contains an email thread from July 2020 involving a Detective from the NYPD/FBI Human Trafficking Task Force. A tipster forwarded a 2011 blog post written by a model who describes being recruited for Victoria's Secret, meeting Ghislaine Maxwell, and being flown on a private jet to Palm Beach where 'the man in charge' (implied to be Epstein) made a sexual advance. The model refused the advance and was immediately flown home.
This document is an email chain from August 15, 2019, involving the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (SDNY). The correspondence coordinates mental health counseling and support for victims in the Epstein case, specifically mentioning a victim in Palm Beach, Florida. The emails identify 'Safe Horizon' (specifically Victoria Dexter and Sherri Papamihalis) as a resource willing to provide counseling slots for these victims.
An email dated August 26, 2019, with the subject 'Epstein victims', documenting two phone calls received by the sender. One call was from a woman claiming to be a victim seeking to speak with an agent regarding a meeting in NY, and the second call was from a woman requesting a flight change from Palm Beach to Fort Lauderdale to attend an event in NY.
This document is an email dated September 14, 2019, from the former Chief of the Palm Beach Police Department (name redacted) to an FBI Special Agent (name redacted). The sender, writing from Global Security Advisors, states they have information 'germane' to the investigation of Epstein's coconspirators and requests a phone call to share details the FBI may not be aware of.
This document is an internal FBI email chain from July 2019 triggered by an inquiry from CNN reporter Mirna Alsharif. CNN sought verification of a 1996 report filed by a victim alleging sexual assault by Jeffrey Epstein and molestation of her younger sister by Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. FBI internal correspondence confirms they are aware of the victim, noting that her younger sister was interviewed during the Palm Beach investigation (referenced as 'MM' for Miami) around 2006-2007, and that they were working with an attorney to interview the victim.
This document is an internal FBI email chain from July 2019 triggered by a press inquiry from CNN regarding a specific victim who claimed she reported an assault to the FBI in 1996. The FBI agents confirm they know the victim and that her younger sister was interviewed during the Palm Beach investigation. The email references allegations that Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell molested the victim's 15-year-old sister in 1996 at Epstein's Upper East Side mansion.
This document contains an email chain from July 2019 initiated by a media inquiry from CNN regarding a new victim in the Jeffrey Epstein case. CNN reporter Mirna Alsharif asked the FBI to verify if the victim had reported a sexual assault to them in 1996, noting that the victim's younger sister was also allegedly molested by Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. Internal FBI correspondence confirms that the FBI is aware of the victim, that her sister was interviewed during the Palm Beach investigation, and that agents were arranging to interview both women.
A 2009 article from PalmBeachDailyNews.com details Jeffrey Epstein's release from Palm Beach County jail to serve one year of probation at his home without electronic monitoring. The article includes reactions from victims (Jane Doe No. 3 and No. 5) and their attorneys, who express outrage at the leniency of the sentence and fear of Epstein's wealth and influence. It also lists the specific conditions of his probation, including a curfew and restrictions on contact with minors.
A printout of a New York Post article dated October 9, 2007, detailing efforts by Jeffrey Epstein's lawyer, Gerald Lefcourt, to avoid sex offender registration for Epstein. The article cites a drafted but unsent letter to U.S. Attorney Alexander Costa (likely Acosta) claiming registration would be inappropriate and have a profound impact on Epstein. It also notes Epstein's past business partnership with Mort Zuckerman.
This document is an email dated April 28, 2021, heavily redacted, regarding the filing of notes from a call with a Palm Beach Police Department (PBPD) Captain. The sender instructs the recipient to place the attached notes into a 'non-testifying witness folder' for an unnamed individual. The document appears to be part of a legal file (indicated by the EFTA stamp) generated well after the primary events of the Epstein case, likely during subsequent litigation or investigations.
This document is a discovery letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team, dated August 21, 2020. It outlines the production of various evidentiary materials, including Boies Schiller documents, emails, search warrant photos, Jeffrey Epstein's deposition recordings (2010), travel records, and SORNA records. The letter explicitly notes that 'highly confidential' materials containing sexualized images are being provided only to counsel, not the defendant, and refuses to produce a separate FBI obstruction file regarding a redacted former employee of Epstein deemed irrelevant to the case.
An email dated July 30, 2019, circulating a South Florida Sun Sentinel article. The article discusses the legal conflict regarding Epstein's 2007 non-prosecution agreement in Florida, noting that while some victims want new charges in Florida following his New York arrest, prosecutors argue others wish to avoid reopening the case to protect their privacy. Lawyers for victims Jane Doe 1 and 2 argue that the privacy concerns of some should not prevent the prosecution of Epstein and his co-conspirators.
This document is an internal email dated December 20, 2019, discussing the collection of title transfer documents and articles of incorporation for Jeffrey Epstein's properties in New York, Palm Beach, and the Virgin Islands. The sender notes that some documents were obtained via grand jury subpoenas and mentions that records for the New Mexico property are currently missing. The attachments reveal specific corporate entities used for these properties, including LSJ LLC, Nautilus Inc., Laurel Inc., and Maple Inc.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity