This document is a digital communication log from March 29, 2017, produced by the House Oversight Committee. It details an exchange between Jeffrey Epstein (using the alias jeeitunes@gmail.com) and a redacted individual regarding introductions to 'Tom' and 'Bill Burns' (William J. Burns). The conversation discusses Burns' role at Carnegie and coordinates a meeting between Burns and the redacted individual, with the recipient noting they are meeting Burns in Mumbai the following week.
This document is a communication log from August 2018 between 'jeeitunes@gmail.com' (an alias for Jeffrey Epstein) and a redacted individual. The conversation involves scheduling travel, specifically mentioning Venice, a 'Deplorable' event on the 9th, and an offer by Epstein to send a private plane to pick the individual up in Washington ('wash') to join him and a person referred to as 'micro' (possibly corrected to 'miro' in the replies). The document is stamped 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT'.
An email thread from February 15, 2017, in which journalist Michael Wolff asks Jeffrey Epstein for introductions to Tom Barrack and Kathy Ruemmler to assist with his upcoming book on the Trump presidency ('Fire and Fury'). Wolff mentions receiving a call from Donald Trump. Epstein agrees to facilitate the connections, noting that Barrack is 'in the middle o some of the mess' and that people in Washington are 'lawyering up.'
An email chain from February 15, 2017, in which journalist Michael Wolff asks Jeffrey Epstein to introduce him to Tom Barrack and reintroduce him to Kathy Ruemmler to assist with his upcoming book on the Trump presidency. Wolff mentions a recent alarming 45-minute phone call with Donald Trump. Epstein responds cooperatively, noting that everyone is 'lawyering up' in Washington, confirming that 'kathy agreed,' and asking for an email to forward to Barrack.
This email thread from February 2017 captures a conversation between journalist Michael Wolff and Jeffrey Epstein. Wolff asks Epstein for introductions to Tom Barrack and Kathy Ruemmler to assist with his upcoming book about the Trump administration. Epstein agrees to forward a message to Barrack but warns that Barrack is 'in the middle o some of the mess' and that people in Washington are 'lawyering up.'
In this February 2017 email thread, journalist Michael Wolff asks Jeffrey Epstein for introductions to Tom Barrack and Kathy Ruemmler to assist with his book about the first 100 days of the Trump presidency. Wolff claims to have significant cooperation from the White House, including a recent 45-minute call with Donald Trump. Epstein replies, agreeing to forward an email to Barrack, while noting that everyone in Washington is 'lawyering up.'
This document is an email thread dated January 6, 2017, between Sultan Bin Sulayem and Jeffrey Epstein (using the alias Jeffrey E. / jeevacation@gmail.com). Sultan seeks Epstein's advice on whether to accept an inauguration invitation from Tom Barrack and asks if it is possible to shake hands with Donald Trump. Epstein advises that the event will be very crowded but suggests it might be worth it if Sultan can meet people in Washington or New York before or after the event.
This document is an email chain from January 6, 2017, between Sultan Bin Sulayem and Jeffrey Epstein regarding the upcoming Presidential inauguration. Sulayem asks Epstein if he should accept an invitation from Tom Barrack and if it would be possible to shake hands with Donald Trump. Epstein responds that the event will be very crowded and shaking hands is 'unlikely,' but suggests it might be worth it if Sulayem can meet people before or after in Washington or New York.
This document is an Associated Press news article dated September 24, 2018, detailing President Trump's defense of his Supreme Court nominee, Brett Kavanaugh, against sexual assault allegations from Christine Blasey Ford. Trump is quoted calling the accusations politically motivated and unfair, while the article also notes the upcoming testimony of both Ford and Kavanaugh before the Senate Judiciary Committee. Although the prompt requests analysis of an 'Epstein-related document,' the content of this specific document pertains exclusively to the Kavanaugh confirmation and contains no information about Jeffrey Epstein.
This document is a digital news report, identified as HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028399, dated September 24, 2018. It details Supreme Court nominee Judge Brett M. Kavanaugh's response to sexual misconduct allegations, including quotes from a letter he sent vowing not to withdraw, and Senator Mitch McConnell's defense of him on the Senate floor. The document is about the Kavanaugh confirmation hearings and contains no information related to Jeffrey Epstein.
This document is a data file from a congressional source, labeled 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028377', containing the text of a news report about the revised U.S.-South Korea free trade agreement signed by President Trump in New York in March 2018. It details the terms of the agreement and includes reactions from President Trump, a former negotiator, and an industry group. The document's content is exclusively about this trade deal and contains no information related to Jeffrey Epstein.
This document, produced by EY following the 2016 election, provides a profile of expected US Senate committee leadership for the upcoming Congress. It details the chairmen and ranking members for key committees and analyzes the various political scenarios influencing these appointments, such as retirements, term limits, and senators' strategic choices. Despite the prompt's framing, the document's content is purely about US Senate politics and contains no information related to Jeffrey Epstein.
This document is a 'Tax Topics' newsletter from Deutsche Asset & Wealth Management, dated December 20, 2013, authored by Blanche Lark Christerson. It analyzes a recent bipartisan budget deal, discusses the status of tax reform legislation, and explains temporary tax provisions known as 'extenders'. The document contains no direct mention of Jeffrey Epstein; its relevance is likely contextual, stemming from its origin at Deutsche Bank and its inclusion in a collection of documents from the House Oversight Committee, as indicated by the footer.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity