Bertrand Russell

Person
Mentions
31
Relationships
3
Events
1
Documents
15

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.

Event Timeline

Interactive Timeline: Hover over events to see details. Events are arranged chronologically and alternate between top and bottom for better visibility.
3 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
person Whitehead
Co authors
8 Strong
4
View
person Donald Rumsfeld
Comparison
5
1
View
person Gottlob Frege
Professional academic
1
1
View
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
1890-01-01 N/A Whitehead and Russell began writing Principia Mathematica Cambridge View

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016882.jpg

The text argues against the concept of technological determinism, asserting that political freedom is driven by norms and institutions rather than technology levels. The author uses historical examples to show that repression existed in low-tech eras and that modern high-tech societies often have high degrees of freedom, countering fears of an inevitable "surveillance state."

Book page or academic text excerpt
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016844.jpg

This document appears to be a page from a book or essay collection (page 41) bearing a House Oversight stamp. It contains a biographical introduction for philosopher Dan Dennett, written in the first person. The text details Dennett's standing in the AI community, contrasts his views with philosophers like Searle and Fodor, and recounts a conversation from 25 years prior where AI pioneer Marvin Minsky praised Dennett as the 'next Bertrand Russell.'

Essay introduction / biographical sketch (likely from a book or manuscript)
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015886.jpg

This document is page 196 from a book titled 'Are the Androids Dreaming Yet?', stamped with a House Oversight Bates number (HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015886). The text discusses the history of mathematics, specifically focusing on Russell and Whitehead's 'Principia Mathematica' (including an Amazon listing screenshot) and David Hilbert's famous 1900 lecture in Paris outlining unsolved mathematical problems. It touches on the 'Decision Problem' and the Clay Institute's Millennium Prizes. While part of an investigation file, the page itself contains historical narrative text and does not explicitly mention Epstein or his associates.

Book excerpt / evidence file
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015885.jpg

This document appears to be a page from a book titled 'Known Unknowns' included in House Oversight Committee evidence regarding Jeffrey Epstein. The text discusses the history and complexity of the mathematical work 'Principia Mathematica' (PM) by Whitehead and Russell, contrasting it with Newton's work of the same name. It highlights the book as a collector's item, noting its scarcity (750 copies printed) and financial value at auction.

Book excerpt / congressional evidence
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015884.jpg

This document is page 194 from a text titled 'Are the Androids Dreaming Yet?', bearing the Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015884. The text explores philosophical concepts of knowledge, contrasting mathematician David Hilbert's belief that 'we must know' with Donald Rumsfeld's famous quote about 'known unknowns' and 'unknown unknowns.' While part of a House Oversight production (potentially related to a larger investigation), this specific page contains no direct references to Jeffrey Epstein, his associates, or victims.

Book page / manuscript page (evidence submission)
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015845.jpg

This document appears to be page 155 from a book or manuscript titled 'Kittens & Gorillas', stamped with a House Oversight Bates number (015845), indicating it is part of a congressional investigation file. The text discusses mathematical logic, specifically the Barber Paradox and Russell's Paradox, referencing historical figures Bertrand Russell and Gottlob Frege. While the content is academic, its presence in this specific discovery collection suggests it may have been seized from a personal library or document cache relevant to the investigation.

Book page / manuscript / evidence document
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013684.jpg

This document is a page from a bibliography or reading list (page 184) produced during House Oversight proceedings. It lists various books published between 1929 and 2002, covering topics such as mathematics, physics, religion, geometry, and neurobiology. The selection reflects eclectic intellectual interests, including titles on fractals, catastrophe theory, and mysticism.

Bibliography / reading list / inventory
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013670.jpg

This document appears to be page 170 of a manuscript or memoir, stamped as evidence by the House Oversight Committee. The text describes the narrator's sabbatical at Warwick University's 'Math House #2,' exploring philosophical themes regarding mysticism, logic, and religion through references to Blake, Hume, Tillich, and Russell. The page concludes with a cliffhanger stating that 'Math House #2 had an aura of infamy,' though the specific reason is cut off at the bottom of the page.

Manuscript / memoir page (evidence file)
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016106.jpg

This document appears to be page 416 from the index of a book titled 'Are the Androids Dreaming Yet?'. It lists various topics, people, and concepts ranging from 'Robinson' to 'story', including figures like Donald Rumsfeld, Bertrand Russell, and Carl Sagan, as well as technical concepts like RSA encryption and software. The document bears a Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016106', indicating it was part of a document production for a congressional oversight investigation.

Book index / government oversight document
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016082.jpg

This document is page 392 of a book (possibly titled 'Are the Androids Dreaming Yet?') containing a bibliography/reference list for Chapters 15 and 16. It cites various academic and popular works related to physics, quantum mechanics, free will, and philosophy, including authors such as Stephen Hawking, Daniel Dennett, and Bertrand Russell. The page bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016082' stamp, indicating it was part of a document production for a congressional investigation, likely related to Jeffrey Epstein given the context of his scientific interests and connections to cited figures like Hawking and Lloyd.

Bibliography / reference list (book page)
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016079.jpg

This document is page 389 of a bibliography from a book, likely related to mathematics, logic, physics, music, or consciousness studies, given the titles listed (e.g., 'Gödel’s Theorem', 'Musicophilia', 'The Emperor’s New Mind'). It lists citations for works by prominent scientists and thinkers such as Roger Penrose, Douglas Hofstadter, Oliver Sacks, and Alan Turing. The page includes a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was produced as evidence for a congressional investigation, likely regarding Jeffrey Epstein's connections to the scientific community.

Bibliography / book excerpt (evidence production)
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016078.jpg

This document is page 388 of a bibliography from a book titled 'Are the Androids Dreaming Yet?'. It lists references for Chapters 7, 8, and 9, focusing on topics such as mathematics, logic, chaos theory, and cellular automata. The document bears the stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016078', indicating it is part of a document production for a Congressional investigation, likely related to Jeffrey Epstein's scientific interests or library.

Bibliography / reference list
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016076.jpg

This document is a bibliography page (numbered 386) from a manuscript titled 'Are the Androids Dreaming Yet?', likely produced as evidence in a House Oversight investigation (document number 016076). It lists references for Chapter 2 and Chapter 3, citing works from 1986 to 2011 on topics including psychology, artificial intelligence, communication theory, and body language. While the document stamp suggests it is part of an investigation file (potentially related to Epstein given the user context), the text itself is strictly an academic or literary reference list with no direct mention of Epstein or his associates on this specific page.

Bibliography / reference list (house oversight committee production)
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016407.jpg

The text discusses the evolution and modern relevance of the Turing Test, contrasting historical text-based interactions with modern visual interfaces like those used by Siri and Wolfram|Alpha. The speaker argues that visual displays offer higher communication bandwidth than pure language and suggests that a more practical modern Turing Test would be an AI capable of automating personal email responses based on long-term user data.

Transcript or book page (likely testimony/interview)
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016355.jpg

This document appears to be page 135 of a book or essay titled 'The Human Strategy' by Alex 'Sandy' Pentland, a professor at the MIT Media Lab. The text discusses the evolution of AI and cybernetics, arguing for a shift from studying individual actors to understanding complex networks and 'human-AI ecologies.' The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was likely collected as evidence during the congressional investigation into the MIT Media Lab's funding ties to Jeffrey Epstein, although Epstein is not mentioned in this specific text.

Essay / book excerpt (included in house oversight committee investigation files)
2025-11-19
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
1
As Recipient
0
Total
1

Paradox in set theory

From: Bertrand Russell
To: Gottlob Frege

Russell pointed out the paradox: 'What about the set of sets that does not contain itself?'

Letter
N/A

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity