The United States
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
David Parse
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Agreement modification | Modification of paragraph 7 of the Non-Prosecution Agreement to clarify the process for selecting... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal agreement | Execution of an agreement between The United States and Epstein regarding civil claims from victims. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Selection of attorney representative for victims | Unspecified | View |
| 2015-08-28 | Legal filing | An addendum to the Non-Prosecution Agreement concerning Jeffrey Epstein was filed, modifying para... | N/A | View |
| 2007-10-26 | N/A | Deadline for Epstein to be sentenced. | Florida | View |
2022.12.20%20Motion%20-%20Motion.pdf
This document is a legal motion filed on December 20, 2022, in the Superior Court of the Virgin Islands by the Co-Executors of the Jeffrey Epstein Estate (Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn). They are moving to withdraw a previous motion for attorneys' fees because a resolution was reached in a related case (Govt of USVI v. Epstein Estate et al., ST-2020-CV-00014). The document includes a certificate of service listing government officials and attorneys served with this motion.
EFTA00035545.pdf
This document is an email thread from July 24, 2019, between MCC New York medical staff (including a Chief Pharmacist) regarding inmate Jeffrey Epstein (#76318-054). The discussion centers on Epstein's complaint that he was not receiving his constipation medication (docusate sodium/Colace) while on 'Psychological Observation,' despite records showing a 30-day supply was filled on July 12. The staff discusses coordinating with the Duty PA, RN, or MD to resolve the issue.
EFTA00033983.pdf
This document is an email thread from July 24, 2019, between medical staff at MCC New York regarding an inmate (implied to be Jeffrey Epstein) currently on Psychological Observation. The inmate complained about not receiving his constipation medication (docusate sodium/colace). The Chief Pharmacist notes the prescription was filled on July 12 for a 30-day supply and agrees to coordinate with the RN and MD to resolve the issue.
EFTA00013616.pdf
This document is an email chain from October 2007 between Jay Lefkowitz (Epstein's counsel) and a federal prosecutor (USAFLS) negotiating specific terms of the Non-Prosecution Agreement. The text outlines a mechanism where an independent third party selects an attorney representative for '40 potential complainants,' with Epstein agreeing to pay their hourly legal fees provided they negotiate settlements rather than file contested lawsuits under 18 U.S.C. 2255. The prosecutor's reply accepts most of Lefkowitz's draft but deletes a clause that would have restricted the government from communicating with the independent third party.
DOJ-OGR-00000098.tif
This document is page 35a of a legal file, specifically an Addendum to the Non-Prosecution Agreement in the investigation of Jeffrey Epstein. It details the modification of Paragraph 7, establishing a process involving an independent third party to select an attorney representative for victims. It explicitly states Epstein's agreement to pay the customary hourly rates for this representative, while clarifying he is not obligated to pay for contested litigation filed against him.
DOJ-OGR-00021517.jpg
This document is an Addendum to Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement, labeled Exhibit SA-341. It modifies the original agreement to establish a process where the United States appoints an independent third party to select an attorney representative for the victims, subject to the approval of Epstein's counsel. The addendum stipulates that Epstein will pay the customary hourly rates for this attorney representative, but his obligation to pay ceases if the representative files contested litigation against him.
DOJ-OGR-00021508.jpg
This legal document, part of a larger agreement, outlines the terms under which Jeffrey Epstein will address civil claims from victims identified by the United States government. Epstein agrees that after he is sentenced, the U.S. will provide a list of victims to his attorneys, and he will pay for an attorney representative for them. For any victims who file suit under 18 U.S.C. § 2255, Epstein agrees not to contest the jurisdiction of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida and waives his right to contest liability and damages up to an agreed-upon amount, with the stipulation that this agreement is not an admission of liability for any other purpose.
DOJ-OGR-00009907.jpg
This document is an index or table of contents from a legal case file, specifically page 'iv' of a larger document. It lists various court documents, including trial transcripts from May 2011, correspondence between legal professionals and a judge, a defendant's motion, and a list of the government's trial exhibits. The exhibits include financial records from Deutsche Bank Alex. Brown and correspondence dating back to 2001, involving individuals such as defendant David Parse, Matt Coleman, and C.R. Gibb.
DOJ-OGR-00002967.jpg
This legal document, part of a court filing from April 16, 2021, presents an argument about the jurisdictional scope of plea agreements. The author refutes a defendant's motion by citing case law, primarily *Annabi*, to argue that a plea agreement only binds the specific U.S. Attorney's Office that made it, unless it explicitly states a broader scope. The document contrasts this with the defendant's argument that without an explicit limitation, an agreement should bind the entire federal government.
DOJ-OGR-00004652.jpg
This document is page 4 of a legal agreement (likely the 2008 Non-Prosecution Agreement) between the United States and Jeffrey Epstein. It outlines the process for identifying victims, establishing a representative for them (paid by Epstein), and handling civil restitution claims under 18 U.S.C. § 2255 without Epstein admitting criminal or civil liability. The document creates a framework where Epstein waives certain defenses against specific victims listed by the government while explicitly stating that signing the deal is not an admission of guilt.
DOJ-OGR-00004639.jpg
This document is an addendum to the Non-Prosecution Agreement concerning the investigation of Jeffrey Epstein, filed on May 25, 2021. It modifies the original agreement to clarify the procedures for appointing and compensating an attorney representative for victims. The addendum specifies Epstein's financial responsibilities for these legal fees, outlining the conditions under which he is obligated to pay and when that obligation ceases, particularly in the event of contested litigation.
DOJ-OGR-00005540.jpg
This document is a legal addendum, filed on August 28, 2015, to the Non-Prosecution Agreement between Jeffrey Epstein and the United States. It clarifies the procedure for appointing an independent attorney representative for victims, detailing that the U.S. and Epstein will both have input on the selection. The addendum specifies that Epstein has agreed to pay this representative's fees, but this financial obligation will cease if the representative chooses to file contested litigation against him.
DOJ-OGR-00005535.jpg
This page is a critical excerpt from Jeffrey Epstein's controversial Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). It outlines the sentencing timeline (late 2007) and specifically grants federal immunity to Epstein's 'potential co-conspirators,' explicitly naming Sarah Kellen, Adriana Ross, Lesley Groff, and Nadia Marcinkova. The document also stipulates that the agreement was intended to remain confidential and details the suspension of the federal Grand Jury investigation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020600.jpg
This document, labeled Appendix 1 with a House Oversight footer, details the organizational structure of China's State Council Information Office (SCIO) and the External Propaganda Leading Group (EPLG). It explains the dual nature of the organization ('one organ, two signboards') serving both the State and the Communist Party to coordinate international propaganda. The footnotes cite various reports from 2014 to 2018 regarding Chinese influence operations.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020587.jpg
This document appears to be page 128 of a House Oversight Committee report titled 'Technology and Research.' It discusses US export control reforms intended to protect national security, specifically regarding the synchronization of the Munitions List and Commerce Control List to prevent technology transfer to China. It also details the role of the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) in reviewing and rejecting Chinese acquisitions of American companies.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026825.jpg
This document is a biography sheet for Deutsche Asset & Wealth Management featuring two speakers: Francis J. Kelly and Larry V. Adam. It details their professional titles, responsibilities within Deutsche Bank, previous employment history in government and finance, and educational backgrounds. The document bears the Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026825, indicating it was part of a Congressional investigation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026824.jpg
This document is a professional biography for Francis J. Kelly, a Managing Director and Global Coordinator for Public Affairs at Deutsche Bank. It details his current roles, previous employment in the private sector (Charles Schwab, Merrill Lynch) and government (SEC, DOJ, White House), and his board memberships. The document appears to be part of a production for the House Oversight Committee, indicated by the Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026824.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010530.jpg
This document contains pages 188-189 from the book 'Filthy Rich', presented as a House Oversight exhibit. It details the controversial Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) signed by Jeffrey Epstein on September 24, 2007, which protected him from a 57-count federal indictment. The text highlights the secrecy of the deal, the high-profile legal team (including Ken Starr and Roy Black), the immunity granted to co-conspirators like Sarah Kellen, and the fact that victims were neither consulted nor notified.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025868.jpg
This document is page 16 of a larger report regarding the Office of Government Information Services (OGIS) and its recommendations for improving the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). It details efforts in 2012 and 2013 to implement dispute resolution strategies to avoid litigation, involving pilot programs with agencies like NARA. While the document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, the text itself contains no direct mention of Jeffrey Epstein or his associates; it appears to be administrative documentation likely included in a broader oversight production.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity