| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011-01-01 | N/A | OECD review of income inequality ratios | Global/US | View |
This document consists of two presentation slides (pages 391 and 392) from a KPCB report titled 'USA Inc. | What Might a Turnaround Expert Consider?'. The slides analyze the economic competitiveness of the USA compared to its peers over a 10-year period (2000-2010), citing data from McKinsey, the IMF, and the OECD to argue that the US has deteriorated on 20 out of 29 key economic attributes. The document bears the Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021037, indicating it was part of a document production for a House Oversight Committee investigation.
The document consists of two presentation slides from a report titled 'USA Inc. | What Might a Turnaround Expert Consider?' produced by KPCB (Kleiner Perkins). The slides analyze the economic impact of education, arguing that government spending on education yields a high Return on Investment (ROI) through incremental tax returns. Data from 2005 (sourced from the OECD) compares the Net Present Value of individuals with secondary versus higher education. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was part of a document production for a US House Oversight Committee investigation.
This document contains two slides from a 'USA Inc.' presentation by KPCB (Kleiner Perkins), likely authored by Mary Meeker (though she is not named on these specific pages). The slides analyze US economic growth, focusing on productivity, employment, and tax revenues, citing sources like the OECD and Federal Reserve with data up to 2009/2010. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was part of a document production for a congressional investigation, likely included in materials related to Jeffrey Epstein's associations with financial figures or tech executives, though Epstein is not mentioned in the text.
This document consists of two slides from a KPCB presentation titled 'USA Inc. | What Might a Turnaround Expert Consider?'. The slides analyze US economic policy, arguing that while fiscal policy can offset short-term demand shortfalls (referencing the Great Depression), long-term growth requires stimulating productivity and employment. It presents data from 1970-2009 showing US GDP growth drivers, breaking down productivity, employment, and hours worked. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' stamp, indicating it is part of a congressional document production.
This document contains two slides (pages 317 and 318) from a KPCB presentation titled 'USA Inc. | What Might a Turnaround Expert Consider?'. The slides analyze US healthcare inefficiencies, comparing 2007 US health indicators (obesity, infant mortality, etc.) against OECD medians to show the US ranking poorly. It also argues for 'Comparative Effectiveness' research to improve Medicare and Medicaid efficiency, noting that Medicare is currently legally precluded from considering costs in coverage decisions. The document bears the Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021000.
Pages 315 and 316 from a KPCB presentation titled 'USA Inc. | What Might a Turnaround Expert Consider?'. The slides propose restructuring Medicare and Medicaid to improve efficiency. It includes a scatter plot comparing healthcare spending per capita versus life expectancy among OECD countries in 2007, highlighting that the USA spends significantly more for lower life expectancy compared to a linear trend of other nations. The document bears a House Oversight Bates stamp.
This document consists of two slides from a KPCB (Kleiner Perkins) presentation titled 'USA Inc. | What Might a Turnaround Expert Consider?'. The slides analyze rising US healthcare costs compared to France, the UK, and Japan between 1970 and 2007, and discuss the economic incentives driving cost growth in the Medicare and Medicaid systems. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020981' Bates stamp, indicating it was obtained as evidence during a House Oversight Committee investigation, likely included in a larger cache of financial or business documents provided by an institution like JP Morgan or Deutsche Bank.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity