This document, marked as a House Oversight record, draws parallels between private military contractor Erik Prince (Blackwater) and Osama Bin Laden as intelligence assets. It details the controversial legal defense of Jeffrey Epstein by Ken Starr and others, specifically highlighting the sweeping immunity granted by the Southern District of Florida non-prosecution agreement. The text explicitly suggests Epstein's light sentence is best explained by the use of children for 'government-sponsored sexual blackmail.'
This document outlines Kenneth Starr's legal defense of Blackwater regarding the 2004 Fallujah Ambush and his role in securing a non-prosecution agreement for Jeffrey Epstein. It draws parallels between intelligence assets like Erik Prince and Bin Laden, suggesting government complicity in using such figures for operations outside standard political restrictions.
This document appears to be a page from a larger submission to the House Oversight Committee (marked HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015011). It contains allegations against John and Avery Gunther regarding a cover-up for IBM and abuse of their children, alongside complaints about the NSF and the 'Deep State.' The second half of the document is a letter to the Washington Post criticizing Kenneth Starr for his representation of Blackwater and Jeffrey Epstein, while questioning the focus of the original Starr Report.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity