| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Legal proceeding | The government filed a Rule 48 motion for leave to dismiss a charge against a defendant in the ca... | N/A | View |
This document is a transcript from a court hearing on September 3, 2019, where Paul Cassell, a law professor and former federal judge, addresses the court. He commends the judge's handling of victim impact statements and strongly urges the judge to publish their remarks as a formal opinion to promote transparency and set a legal precedent, referencing a case he wrote about, U.S. v. Heaton.
This document is a page from a legal transcript or filing where the speaker argues that a court must independently evaluate a government's motion to dismiss and is required to consider the victims' views before making a decision. The speaker cites the case of United States v. Heaton and the expert opinion of former Judge Paul G. Cassell, who concluded that the Crime Victims' Rights Act gives victims broad rights in such matters. The speaker expresses full agreement with this viewpoint, despite some factual differences between the current case and the Heaton case.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity