| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Raymond Tison
|
Family |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Donny Tison
|
Family |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Narrator
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Gary Tison
|
Father son |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Supreme Court decision in Tison v. Arizona | Washington D.C. (Supreme Co... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Reversal of death penalties for Ricky and Raymond Tison. | Arizona Courts | View |
| N/A | N/A | Sentencing of Ricky and Raymond Tison to death. | Arizona | View |
| N/A | N/A | Prison escape of Gary Tison and Randy Greenawalt assisted by Tison brothers. | Arizona | View |
This document appears to be a page from a manuscript (likely by Alan Dershowitz) recounting the legal victory in the Tison v. Arizona death penalty case. The text details correspondence with one of the Tison brothers regarding religion and salvation. A significant footnote describes an unnamed 'sophisticated' client in federal prison who pretended to convert to Judaism weekly to access better food at Shabbat dinners.
This document appears to be a page from a manuscript or memoir (likely by Alan Dershowitz) discussing the legal battle of the Tison brothers (Ricky and Raymond) against the death penalty in Arizona. It details the Supreme Court's decision to vacate their death sentences based on a new 'reckless disregard' standard, the subsequent reimposition of the sentence by a trial judge, and the eventual reversal by the Arizona Supreme Court to allow for new evidence. The document is stamped with a House Oversight Bates number, indicating its inclusion in a congressional investigation, likely related to Dershowitz's involvement in the Epstein case.
This document appears to be a page from a book manuscript or legal memoir (page 176) discussing the US Supreme Court case *Tison v. Arizona*. The author (narrating in the first person) describes their reaction to Justice Sandra Day O'Connor's majority opinion, initially believing they had won based on the Court's acceptance that the Tison brothers did not intend to kill. The text analyzes the legal definitions of 'intent to kill' versus 'reckless indifference' in the context of the death penalty and the felony-murder rule.
This document appears to be a page from a draft manuscript (dated 4.2.12) or memoir, likely by Alan Dershowitz (based on the context of the Tison v. Arizona case), produced as part of a House Oversight investigation. The text details the ethical conflict the author faced as the defense attorney for Ricky and Raymond Tison, balancing his duty to his clients against warnings from other anti-capital punishment lawyers that appealing to the Supreme Court could threaten the *Enmund* precedent. The page recounts the decision to file for certiorari and the subsequent anxiety when the Supreme Court granted review, signaling a potential reversal of favorable case law.
This document appears to be a narrative account or excerpt regarding the final days of the Tison Gang manhunt in Arizona. It details a violent police confrontation on August 11 involving a roadblock, the death of driver Donny Tison due to withheld medical care, the brutal interrogation of Ricky Tison, and the eventual discovery of Gary Tison's body in the Papago Indian Reservation. The document bears a House Oversight stamp, suggesting it is part of a larger congressional inquiry file.
This document is a page from a book manuscript (Chapter 12), likely written by Alan Dershowitz, discussing the legal defense of Ricky and Raymond Tison. It details the 'felony-murder' rule and the author's decision to represent the brothers pro bono in their appeal against the death penalty in Arizona. The text outlines the background of the case, where the brothers helped their father escape prison but did not personally kill anyone during the subsequent murders.
This document appears to be page 2 of a Table of Contents for a non-fiction book manuscript, dated April 2, 2012. It lists chapters 9 through 18, organized under Part III (Criminal Justice) and Part IV (Equality and Justice), covering topics such as Holocaust denial, capital punishment, rape legislation, and the human rights agenda. The document includes word counts (WC) for each chapter and references legal figures such as Barry Scheck and Justice John Paul Stevens.
Do you want to see your dying brother?
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity