| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Jay
|
Employment |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MR. EPSTEIN
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MR. EPSTEIN
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jay Lefkowitz
|
Employment affiliation |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Negotiation of the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). | Unspecified | View |
| 2008-06-19 | N/A | Date of the letter arguing against new investigation. | N/A | View |
| 2008-06-19 | N/A | Date of the letter | N/A | View |
This document contains an email chain from October 11-12, 2007, between Jay Lefkowitz (Kirkland & Ellis) and the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida (Alex Acosta and a redacted AUSA). The emails discuss and finalize the text of an 'Addendum to the Non-Prosecution Agreement' for Jeffrey Epstein. The addendum clarifies the process for appointing an independent third party to select an attorney representative for the victims and stipulates that Epstein will pay the representative's fees but is not obligated to fund contested litigation against himself.
An email chain from June 20, 2008, detailing the submission of legal defense documents by Kenneth Starr and Jay Lefkowitz (Kirkland & Ellis) to John Roth at the DOJ. The documents include a 'Principal Submission' and a 'Summary of Misconduct'. Roth forwards this to the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida (Alex Acosta's office), noting the volume of material and suggesting a delay in responding. Acosta instructs his staff to print the documents.
A letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office (Southern District of Florida), signed on behalf of Alexander Acosta, to Jeffrey Epstein's attorney Jay Lefkowitz. The letter aggressively rebuts Lefkowitz's allegations of misconduct, specifically denying a conflict of interest regarding the potential appointment of Bert Ocariz and defending the office's handling of the Non-Prosecution Agreement and victim notifications. The author expresses surprise at the attacks given previous cooperation and asserts that the office made significant concessions to Epstein during negotiations.
This document is an email chain from November 2007 between Jay Lefkowitz (Kirkland & Ellis) and the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida (USAFLS). The correspondence concerns the scheduling of Jeffrey Epstein's plea and sentencing hearings. Lefkowitz asserts that the Court confirmed a date of January 4th for both the plea and sentencing on 'agreed-upon counts,' while USAFLS staff discuss conflicting dates (Dec 14/16) internally and await confirmation from Judge Davis.
This document is an email thread from October 30-31, 2007, between attorney Jay Lefkowitz (Kirkland & Ellis) and the US Attorney's Office (USAFLS) regarding Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement. The correspondence discusses the execution of an addendum, the role of Judge Davis, and the handling of discovery/subpoenas to verify claims. The government official clarifies that Epstein has waived his right to contest liability and damages under the agreement and that their office's role is strictly limited to monitoring potential breaches of the NPA.
This document contains a chain of emails from October 2007 between Jeffrey Epstein's attorney, Jay Lefkowitz, and officials from the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida (USAFLS), including references to US Attorney Alex Acosta. The correspondence details tense negotiations regarding the Non-Prosecution Agreement, specifically focusing on the selection of a 'Special Master' or attorney representative for the victims, the compensation limits (150k vs 50k), and language allowing for the 'veracity of the victims' claims' to be tested. The government sets a strict deadline for a deal, stating they have made their final concessions.
An email chain from October 18, 2007, between Jay Lefkowitz (Kirkland & Ellis) and the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida (including Alex Acosta and a redacted AUSA). The correspondence finalizes the date for Jeffrey Epstein to enter his guilty plea on November 20, 2007. The USAFLS specifically requests confirmation that postponing the plea date will not delay the start of Epstein's sentence.
This document contains an email chain from October 11-12, 2007, between Jay Lefkowitz (Kirkland & Ellis) and the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida (USAFLS), specifically involving Alex Acosta and a redacted Assistant US Attorney. The correspondence concerns the drafting of an 'Addendum to the Non-Prosecution Agreement' for Jeffrey Epstein. Key points of negotiation include the selection process for an 'independent third-party' to represent victims and the stipulation that Epstein would pay this representative's fees, but not costs associated with contested litigation against him.
A photograph showing collected evidence, including a grey bin labeled 'JE PERSONAL', a legal binder from Kirkland & Ellis LLP labeled 'JE Background Materials' and 'Attorney Work Product', and several sheets of photographic negatives/slides with significant redactions.
This document is a page from a legal filing that contains a repeated confidentiality notice from the law firm Kirkland & Ellis LLP. The notice states that the communication is confidential, potentially attorney-client privileged, and is the property of the firm. It instructs any unintended recipients to notify postmaster@kirkland.com and destroy all copies of the communication.
This document is an email thread from March 7, 2011, in which attorney Jay Lefkowitz contacts Alexandra Wolfe regarding her inquiries about his client, Jeffrey Epstein. Lefkowitz asserts that previous press coverage has been defamatory and requests that Wolfe submit factual questions in writing to ensure accuracy. The top of the document includes fragments of questions regarding Epstein's sentencing leniency and his charitable work with Bill Clinton.
An email correspondence from an attorney named Jay (associated with Kirkland & Ellis LLP) responding to an inquiry regarding his client, Jeffrey Epstein. The sender claims press coverage has been inaccurate and defamatory, requesting that specific factual questions be submitted for accurate responses. The document includes a redacted phone number and standard legal confidentiality disclaimers.
A fax transmission report and cover sheet dated May 19, 2008, sent by Kenneth W. Starr of Kirkland & Ellis LLP to the Honorable Mark Filip at the Office of the Deputy Attorney General (DOJ). The transmission consisted of 9 pages and was successfully sent. The document is marked with the Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019232.
This is the final page (page 8) of a letter dated May 19, 2008, sent by attorneys Kenneth Starr and Joe Whitley to the Honorable Mark Filip. The attorneys are requesting that the Department of Justice discontinue federal involvement in the case (implied to be Epstein's) to allow the State to handle it, arguing issues of federalism and prosecutorial selectivity. They also request a meeting with Filip to discuss these matters.
This document is a fax transmission report and cover sheet dated May 27, 2008. It confirms the successful transmission of a 3-page document from Kenneth W. Starr of Kirkland & Ellis LLP to the Honorable Mark Filip at the Office of the Deputy Attorney General (DOJ). The document contains standard legal confidentiality warnings and bears the Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019223.
This document is a legal letter dated May 27, 2008, from Kenneth Starr and Joe Whitley to Deputy Attorney General Mark Filip, supplementing a request for an independent review of the federal prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein. The letter argues that the prosecution is an unprecedented extension of federal law against a figure with 'close ties to former President Clinton' and complains that Assistant U.S. Attorney Jeffrey Sloman imposed an arbitrary June 2 deadline to force compliance with a Non-Prosecution Agreement, thereby attempting to bypass the requested review. The lawyers also allege misconduct, including leaks to the New York Times and conflicts of interest involving Sloman's former law partner filing civil suits against Epstein.
This document contains the footer section of an email or legal correspondence. It consists entirely of standard legal disclaimers regarding confidentiality, attorney-client privilege, and unauthorized use, specifically identifying the law firm Kirkland & Ellis LLP. The document bears a Bates stamp indicating it is part of a House Oversight Committee production (HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020823).
This document contains an email chain from March 7, 2011, in which attorney Jay Lefkowitz forwards a list of interview questions from journalist Alexandra Wolfe to Jeffrey Epstein (using the alias email jeevacation@gmail.com) and his legal team. Wolfe's questions probe Epstein's current status, including his relationship with Ghislaine Maxwell and Bill Clinton, his business valuation ($15 billion), his time in prison, and his reaction to his conviction. Lefkowitz prefaces the exchange by warning the journalist that previous press coverage has been 'defamatory' and requesting factual questions.
This document is a letter dated June 19, 2008, from Kenneth W. Starr of Kirkland & Ellis LLP to John Roth, Esq. Starr argues that federal prosecutors (USAO/SDFL) improperly interfered in Epstein's state sentencing negotiations by insisting on a harsher sentence (18 months prison + 1 year house arrest) despite claims by Mr. Sloman that they would defer to the State. Starr alleges a 'critical appearance of impropriety' regarding the federal motivation for prosecuting Epstein and requests an oral presentation to review the matter.
This document is page 3 of a legal letter from Kirkland & Ellis LLP to John Roth, dated June 19, 2008, arguing that a new New York-based Grand Jury investigation into Jeffrey Epstein violates his September 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). The letter contends that the NPA protects associates like Leslie Groff and [Redacted], and asserts that the new investigation is a 'fishing expedition' lacking federal jurisdiction (internet luring, travel, etc.). The defense claims that statements from three principal accusers (names redacted) actually undermine the prosecution's case and deny essential elements required for federal charges.
This document is page 2 of a legal letter from Kirkland & Ellis LLP to John Roth, dated June 19, 2008. The firm argues that a previous review of the Epstein case by the DOJ/CEOS was insufficient and requests a true 'de novo' review, citing recent Supreme Court decisions (*Santos* and *Cuellar*) that weaken the federal case. The letter complains that AUSA Villafana has violated the Non-Prosecution Agreement by re-initiating a grand jury investigation and subpoenaing a [redacted] individual to provide testimony and documents (photos, emails, phone records) on July 1, 2008.
An email chain from March 2011 in which attorney Jay Lefkowitz (Kirkland & Ellis LLP) responds to inquiries from Alexandra Wolfe regarding his client, Jeffrey Epstein. Lefkowitz asserts that press coverage of Epstein has been inaccurate and defamatory, requesting that Wolfe submit factual questions in writing. The document includes fragments of Wolfe's initial questions, which reference Epstein's charity initiatives with Bill Clinton.
This page contains only a standard legal confidentiality disclaimer and footer associated with the law firm Kirkland & Ellis (indicated by the email domain). It appears to be the final page of a production document, bearing the Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031982.
This document is a fax transmission report and cover sheet dated May 27, 2008. It indicates that Kenneth W. Starr of Kirkland & Ellis LLP sent a 3-page fax to the Honorable Mark Filip at the Office of the Deputy Attorney General, United States Department of Justice. The transmission was successful.
In this confidential letter dated May 27, 2008, attorneys Kenneth Starr and Joe Whitley urge Deputy Attorney General Mark Filip to intervene in the federal prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein. They allege that the U.S. Attorney's Office in Miami, specifically Jeffrey Sloman, imposed an arbitrary deadline for a Non-Prosecution Agreement to prevent an independent DOJ review. The letter highlights Epstein's 'close ties' to former President Clinton and alleges misconduct by the USAO, including leaks to the New York Times and conflicts of interest involving Sloman's former law partner.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity