| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-01-01 | N/A | Tax Reform Signed Into Law | USA | View |
| 2003-01-01 | Legislation | The 2003 Amendment, whose retroactivity is the subject of the legal argument, was enacted. | N/A | View |
| 2003-01-01 | N/A | Passage and amendment of the Child Abduction Prevention Act | Washington D.C. | View |
| 1990-09-05 | Legislative record | House Report No 101-681 (I) (P 6572) is cited. | N/A | View |
This document is a page from a court transcript (Redirect of witness 'Jane') filed on August 10, 2022. The witness testifies about her family's financial struggles and how Jeffrey Epstein provided financial assistance after she met him and Ghislaine Maxwell. Specific assistance included cash, a computer, tuition for Interlochen Arts Camp, and boarding school tuition at Interlochen Arts Academy for her younger brother.
This is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, USA v. Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. The discussion involves a dispute over a witness's credibility ('impeaching') regarding where she lived at age 14. Ms. Moe argues the witness lived in a pool house due to financial issues, while Mr. Everdell argues that her 1994 Interlochen application lists a different address, contradicting her claim of being homeless or in a pool house.
This legal document, part of Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, discusses the testimony of a witness named Jane regarding a massage room where she was allegedly sexually abused. The Government argues that photographs presented as exhibits corroborate Jane's detailed descriptions of the room's size, features, and the house's artwork, thereby establishing their relevance to the case. The document acknowledges the Court's concern about the lack of testimony directly comparing the photos to the room's state during the conspiracy but asserts that most of Jane's testimony concerns non-movable features.
This document is a page from a court transcript where an attorney discusses the death of their client, Jeffrey Epstein. The attorney argues that the video surveillance tapes from outside Epstein's cell are the most critical piece of evidence and questions the official narrative, suggesting that the tapes being corrupted or inoperative on the specific day of his death points towards foul play rather than long-term incompetence.
This document is a court transcript from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on August 10, 2022. It details the direct examination of a witness, Maguire, by an attorney, Ms. Moe, regarding evidence seized from a house. The witness describes seizing items such as CDs, hard drives, jewelry, and large amounts of U.S. currency, and explains how the evidence was labeled and its chain of custody was handled.
This document, dated February 14, 2005, provides security directives for staff concerning Mr. Epstein and Ms. Maxwell. It instructs staff to maintain strict confidentiality regarding their activities and whereabouts, handle callers by taking messages without disclosing information, and report any strange calls or unusual behavior to Ms. Maxwell. The document emphasizes that the security of the house, Mr. Epstein, Ms. Maxwell, and their guests is the paramount concern.
This document is a Probable Cause Affidavit from the Palm Beach Police Department dated May 1, 2006, charging Haley Robson with lewd and lascivious acts on a child. It details an investigation revealing that Robson recruited minors, including a 14-year-old named 'SG,' to perform massages for Jeffrey Epstein at his Palm Beach residence, which escalated to sexual acts. The document outlines the recruitment process, the role of Sarah Kellen, and specific incidents involving victim SG in February 2005.
This 2006 Probable Cause Affidavit from the Palm Beach Police Department details a statement by a witness named Robson. Robson describes being sexually harassed by Epstein during a massage and subsequently being paid to recruit underage girls (ages 14-16) for him, specifically mentioning a 14-year-old named SG. The document outlines payment amounts for recruitment and sexual acts, and notes the involvement of Epstein's assistant, Sarah.
This document is a Probable Cause Affidavit from the Palm Beach Police Department dated May 1, 2006, charging Haley Robson with Lewd and Lascivious Acts on a child. It details an investigation into Jeffrey Epstein, Sarah Kellen, and Robson, alleging that Robson recruited underage victims (including a 14-year-old identified as 'SG') from Royal Palm Beach High School to perform massages for Epstein at his residence, which resulted in sexual battery. The affidavit describes specific sexual acts, the payment structure for victims, and Robson's role in coaching victims regarding their age.
This Probable Cause Affidavit from the Palm Beach Police Department, dated May 1, 2006, outlines an investigation into Jeffrey Epstein. It details police interviews with a woman named Robson, who admitted to arranging for underage girls to 'work' for Epstein and compared herself to 'Hollywood Madam' Heidi Fleiss. The document also describes interviews with two minors recruited by Robson: a 16-year-old named JS and an unnamed 17-year-old from her high school.
This Probable Cause Affidavit from the Palm Beach Police Department, dated May 1, 2006, details statements by a witness named Robson. Robson describes being paid to recruit young girls (ages 14-16) for Jeffrey Epstein after he told her 'the younger the better' and rejected a 23-year-old. The document details specific payments for recruiting and sexualized massages, and identifies a 14-year-old victim referred to as SG.
This Probable Cause Affidavit from the Palm Beach Police Department, sworn by Det. Joe Recarey on May 1, 2006, details an investigation into Jeffrey Epstein. It outlines evidence against Haley Robson for recruiting underage girls, including a recorded statement where she compares herself to 'Heidi Fleiss'. The document also describes interviews with two minors, JS and another unnamed girl, who were brought to Epstein's residence or another house by Robson.
This document is a page from a court transcript (dated August 10, 2022) featuring the defense summation by Ms. Menninger in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial. Menninger argues that the government failed to record interviews with accusers, preventing the defense from knowing if witnesses were coached. She also attacks witness credibility by highlighting inconsistencies between their testimony and flight logs, and suggesting they added Maxwell to their allegations only after hiring personal injury lawyers.
This document is a transcript of a legal summation by Ms. Moe, likely a prosecutor, in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. Ms. Moe describes a 'household manual' belonging to Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, which she characterizes as a 'powerfully incriminating document' and a 'little black book'. She highlights that multiple copies existed and points to a specific page from Government Exhibit 52-G, titled 'Massage Florida,' noting the suspiciously large number of female names as evidence of wrongdoing.
This document is page 2843 of a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) containing the closing summation by prosecutor Ms. Moe. The text focuses on an essay written by Ghislaine Maxwell where she describes her close, 11-year relationship with Jeffrey Epstein as partners and a couple. The prosecutor argues this evidence proves Maxwell was not a mere assistant but a crucial participant in the scheme, using her respectable appearance to legitimize Epstein's predatory behavior toward underage girls.
This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022. In the transcript, a lawyer named Mr. Pagliuca summarizes testimony for the judge, stating that three witnesses—Carolyn, Jane, and Kate—all testified that they had told Ms. Maxwell their age. He also recounts the testimony of another witness, Mr. Alessi, who said he saw Ms. Roberts and Jane at a house and believed them to be under 18, which is relevant to the issue of the defendant's knowledge of the witnesses' ages.
This document is a faxed page from a 2008 article (likely 'The Fantasist') sent to the State Attorney's Office. It details Epstein's relationship with Ghislaine Maxwell, testimony from housemen Juan Alessi and Alfredo Rodriguez regarding underage girls and sex toys, and Epstein's philosophical justification of wealth inequality. It also contrasts the wealth of Palm Beach with the poverty of West Palm Beach, specifically mentioning Haley Robson and a 14-year-old associate.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers. The testimony establishes that when Epstein first bought a specific property (implied to be the New Mexico ranch), the main house was not built, and Epstein stayed in a trailer while the witness stayed in a bunkhouse at 'Ranch Central.' The questioning then pivots to discuss where Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell lived in New York starting in 1990.
This document is a page from a court transcript featuring a sidebar discussion during the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell. The prosecution (Ms. Comey) argues that evidence of Maxwell's father's death and her subsequent financial decline—followed by Epstein buying her a townhouse—establishes a financial motive for her participation in Epstein's crimes. The defense (Mr. Everdell) objects, claiming the events occurred three years before the alleged conspiracy and are irrelevant.
This is a Palm Beach Police Department incident report detailing an interview conducted on October 11, 2005, with a redacted witness/victim regarding her interactions with Jeffrey Epstein. The report describes her initial recruitment by a woman named Sara, her first massage encounter with Epstein which escalated to sexual acts, and subsequent visits where she witnessed Epstein's assistant, Nada Marcinkova, whom Epstein claimed to have purchased as a sex slave.
This Palm Beach Police Department incident report details allegations regarding a 14-year-old girl recruited by a friend named Haley to visit a wealthy man in Palm Beach. The report describes the 'recruiting' process involving massages for cash and notes that the victim was found with over $300 at school, leading to a fight where she was accused of prostitution. The victim's father signed an affidavit to prosecute for inappropriate sexual behavior.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) recording the summation by defense attorney Ms. Menninger, likely in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial. Menninger argues that the jury should 'hesitate' to convict based on changed stories following the opening of the Epstein Victims Compensation Fund, the credibility of witness Mr. Alessi, and the lack of physical evidence such as photographs, phone records, or proof of payments to Interlochen. She highlights the absence of corroborating testimony from the accusers' family members.
A Palm Beach Police incident report narrative dated January 30, 2006, detailing an interview with a witness named Eaton. Eaton describes meeting Jeffrey Epstein the previous year (at age 17) through her friend Dana Burns, who was dating Epstein. The report details an incident where Epstein provided money for the girls to shop at Victoria's Secret, after which he pressured Eaton to model the purchased lingerie for him at his home with Burns' encouragement.
A Palm Beach Police Department incident report narrative detailing interviews conducted in Orlando on October 12, 2005. Detectives Recarey and Dawson interviewed a witness who admitted to giving Epstein massages for money but denied sexual contact, though the detective noted her responses seemed scripted and she had recently met with a private investigator for Epstein named Paul. The report concludes with the details of obtaining and executing a search warrant at Epstein's home at 358 El Brillo on October 20, 2005.
This document is a partial transcript of an interview or deposition where a redacted speaker describes a past visit with Haley to a two-story, pinkish house with a pool. They encountered a gate and were questioned by a security guard, to whom Haley stated they were there to see Jeff. The conversation also touches upon crossing a bridge and seeing the ocean.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity