| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Filming of the movie Skidoo | Film Set | View |
This legal document is a page from a motion filed on behalf of Ms. Maxwell, arguing that she is entitled to a new trial due to false answers given by Juror No. 50 during jury selection. The central argument is that Maxwell does not need to prove the juror's falsehoods were deliberate, citing several legal precedents to support the claim that even honest mistakes can warrant a new trial to ensure the constitutional right to a fair and impartial jury. The motion criticizes the government's position as a weak attempt to achieve "finality" at the expense of justice.
This legal document, filed on March 11, 2022, is part of a motion on behalf of Ms. Maxwell arguing for a new trial. The central claim is that she does not need to prove that Juror No. 50's false answers during jury selection were deliberately made. The document cites multiple legal precedents to support the argument that even an honest but mistaken answer from a juror can be grounds for a new trial, especially when it raises questions of juror bias.
This document, marked with a House Oversight Bates number, appears to be an excerpt from a narrative or book discussing the production of the 1968 film 'Skidoo.' It details the FBI's concerns regarding the film's script, Jackie Gleason's status as an FBI contact, and a personal anecdote about Groucho Marx taking LSD with the narrator at a home in Beverly Hills. The text does not explicitly mention Jeffrey Epstein, despite being part of a larger oversight file.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity