| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Justice Blackmun
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1978-01-01 | N/A | Bakke decision | US Supreme Court | View |
This document appears to be a page from a legal manuscript or essay (possibly by Alan Dershowitz, given the context of these file dumps and the subject matter, though not explicitly named on the page) discussing the legal complexities of affirmative action, specifically referencing Justice Powell's opinion in the Bakke case and Harvard College's admissions program. The text argues the distinction between theoretical 'diversity' (treating race like being a musician or Oklahoman) versus the practical reality where race might be treated as a quota. The document is stamped with a House Oversight Bates number.
This document appears to be page 297 of a draft manuscript or legal text (dated 4.2.12 at the top) produced during a House Oversight investigation. It analyzes the Supreme Court's *Bakke* decision, critiquing Justice Powell's opinion and comparing the affirmative action policies of Harvard College versus UC Davis. The text argues that Harvard's 'holistic' approach, which includes legacy preferences ('genealogy') and vague factors, may be less fair than Davis's explicit quotas, favoring wealthy minority applicants over disadvantaged ones.
This document appears to be a page from a manuscript or legal analysis (possibly by Alan Dershowitz, given the style and context of these files) discussing the Supreme Court's *Bakke* decision regarding affirmative action. The text critiques Justice Powell's opinion for favoring Harvard's vague 'holistic' admissions process over Davis Medical School's specific quotas, calling the decision a 'triumph of ambiguity.' The document bears a House Oversight Bates stamp.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity