This document is an email chain from November 6, 2019, initiated by Fox News correspondent Bryan Llenas to the SDNY. Llenas seeks comment on claims by Mark Epstein that the SDNY is withholding Jeffrey Epstein's medical examiner files and canceling meetings regarding the homicide ruling. Internal SDNY emails discuss the request, with one official noting that 'at least some of this is false' and asking if they know the reporter, to which another replies 'No, unfortunately.'
This legal document, filed on August 11, 2025, outlines the Department of Justice and FBI's position that no further disclosure regarding the Epstein investigation is warranted. It references a July 2025 memo which supported the official conclusion of Epstein's suicide on August 10, 2019, and notes the subsequent public and congressional dissatisfaction, citing various news articles from July 2025 that reported on the controversy and calls for greater transparency.
This legal letter, dated June 5, 2006, from the Law Offices of Gerald B. Lefcourt to Ms. Lanna Belohlavek, analyzes the significant risk that their client could be subjected to sex offender registration laws (Megan's Law). The analysis focuses on Florida law but also considers risks in other jurisdictions like the Virgin Islands and New Jersey, highlighting a national trend of expanding such statutes and citing recent court decisions and news articles as evidence. The letter warns that even a plea to aggravated assault carries a grave risk of future registration requirements and associated burdens for the client.
This legal document, filed by the Government on July 1, 2021, to Judge Alison J. Nathan, argues that statements made to the media by defense appellate counsel, Mr. Markus, violate Local Rule 23.1. The filing specifically cites a recent Op-Ed where Markus compared his client's case to Bill Cosby's, arguing these extrajudicial comments are designed to prejudice potential jurors and interfere with a fair trial. The Government asserts that relief is warranted to prevent further prejudicial statements.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity