Assistant Attorney General Fisher
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Acosta
|
Reported to communicated with |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Lourie
|
Supervisor chief of staff |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008-05-14 | Letter | Starr sent a letter to Assistant Attorney General Fisher reiterating complaints and requesting a ... | N/A | View |
| 2008-05-13 | Conversation | Starr spoke with Assistant Attorney General Fisher. | N/A | View |
EFTA00013758.pdf
This document contains an email chain between Jeffrey Epstein's defense attorney, Jay Lefkowitz, and the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida (USAFLS) in late November 2007. The correspondence reveals a significant dispute regarding the government's intention to notify alleged victims about the case under the 'Justice for All Act,' to which the defense strongly objects, arguing it would cause reputational damage and spur civil litigation before a plea is entered. The emails also discuss the selection of attorneys Podhurst and Josephsberg for a role in the proceedings, which the defense ultimately accepts.
DOJ-OGR-00023137.tif
This document details interactions between Jeffrey Epstein's defense team and the USAO in late 2007, focusing on submissions, a key meeting in Miami on December 14, 2007, and the defense's threat to pursue a Department of Justice review. The discussions revolved around defense complaints, a proposed revised indictment, and a new argument by Epstein's attorneys regarding the applicability of the state charge he agreed to plead guilty to. The document also highlights the USAO's internal review processes and Acosta's communication with Assistant Attorney General Fisher regarding the case.
DOJ-OGR-00021414.jpg
This legal document details a dispute between the prosecution (represented by Sloman, Villafaña, and Acosta) and Jeffrey Epstein's defense team (Starr and Lefkowitz) regarding the government's obligation to notify victims under the VRRA. The prosecution argues for the necessity of informing victims about Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement and his upcoming state plea deal, scheduled for December 14, 2007, while the defense objects strongly. The document includes excerpts from letters exchanged between the two sides, outlining their legal positions and the specifics of the proposed plea agreement.
Potential Defense Appeal
Notified that defense might appeal to her and asked her to grant expedited review to preserve plea date
Potential Appeal and Expedited Review
Acosta notified Fisher that the defense team might appeal and requested an expedited review to preserve the January 4th plea date.
Starr and Lefkowitz submissions
Acosta had the Starr and Lefkowitz submissions of December 11 forwarded to Fisher.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity