Paris
PersonRelationship Network
DOJ-OGR-00001687.jpg
This legal document, page 3 of a filing to Judge Alison J. Nathan dated July 29, 2020, presents the defense's argument against a government-proposed protective order in the case against Ms. Maxwell. The defense contends the order would impede their ability to investigate alleged victims and witnesses, citing legal precedents where individuals waived their privacy rights by making information public. The document asserts the need for a full investigation to challenge the credibility of accusers and mount an effective defense for their client, who is presumed innocent.
DOJ-OGR-00001665.jpg
This legal document, filed on July 28, 2020, is the government's argument against a defendant's request to publicly name victims of herself or Epstein. The government contends that such disclosure is inappropriate and violates victims' rights to privacy and safety, citing the Crime Victims' Rights Act and several legal precedents. The filing supports a proposed protective order that would prevent public identification of victims while still allowing the defense to prepare for trial.
DOJ-OGR-00005575.jpg
This legal document is a page from a government filing arguing in favor of a limited sealing request to protect the identities of minor victims. The government asserts that this request is minimally burdensome and legally sound, citing precedents where victim privacy outweighs public access, especially for evidence not yet shared in open court. It directly refutes the defense's claim that the request violates Second Circuit law by distinguishing the cases the defense relies upon.
DOJ-OGR-00005561.jpg
This legal document, filed on October 29, 2021, argues that the defense in a federal criminal case is improperly relying on civil case law regarding pseudonyms for plaintiffs. It asserts that the current case involves crime victims, who are entitled to statutory protections under the Crime Victims' Rights Act, unlike civil plaintiffs who are generally required to identify themselves. The document criticizes the defense for ignoring relevant precedent from high-profile sex abuse trials and for citing irrelevant civil cases.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026532.jpg
This document appears to be page 12 of an academic manuscript regarding evolutionary psychology, game theory, and the modeling of emotions like love and 'taboo trade-offs.' The text discusses the social optimality of policies like euthanasia bans and formalizes arguments by 'Frank (1988)' regarding love as a commitment device that signals reliability to partners. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was produced as evidence for a congressional investigation, likely related to Jeffrey Epstein's funding of scientific research and academic connections.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025474.jpg
This document contains a log of text/email messages from May 16, 2019, primarily sent by 'e:jeeitunes@gmail.com' (an account associated with Jeffrey Epstein). The messages discuss political optics regarding the Alabama abortion bill and provide insider knowledge about Bill de Blasio's presidential bid announcement. A redacted sender messages 'Your girl is Paris,' to which jeeitunes responds with surprise.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity