Employee-1
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Employee |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
MR. EPSTEIN
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Employment |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Action on behalf of epstein | Employee-1, located in the Southern District of New York, acted on behalf of EPSTEIN, placed [tex... | Southern District of New York | View |
| N/A | Trial | An upcoming trial where the Government may offer exhibits 401-404, 409-410, and 413, and call "Em... | N/A | View |
| 2021-11-19 | Court filing | Issuance of an ORDER regarding Government Exhibit 52 and the authentication by Employee-1. | null | View |
| 2005-10-01 | N/A | Removal of Evidence | Epstein's house | View |
001-02.pdf
This document is the 2019 Sealed Indictment (19 Cr. 490) against Jeffrey Epstein filed in the SDNY, charging him with Sex Trafficking Conspiracy and Sex Trafficking. It details allegations that between 2002 and 2005, Epstein created a network of underage victims in New York and Florida, paying them for sexual acts disguised as massages and incentivizing them to recruit other minors. The indictment lists specific overt acts involving three minor victims and three employees who facilitated the abuse by scheduling appointments, and it seeks forfeiture of Epstein's property at 9 East 71st Street, owned by Maple, Inc.
022-01.pdf
This document is an indictment (19 Cr. 490) filed in the SDNY charging Jeffrey Epstein with sex trafficking conspiracy and sex trafficking of minors between 2002 and 2005. It details how Epstein used a network of employees and victim-recruiters to source minors for sexual abuse at his residences in New York and Palm Beach, paying them in cash. The document also includes forfeiture allegations for his property at 9 East 71st Street, New York, owned by Maple, Inc.
EFTA00016136.pdf
This document is a formal legal letter dated August 1, 2019, from Jeffrey Epstein's defense counsel (Steptoe & Johnson LLP) to the U.S. Attorney's Office for the SDNY. The letter requests extensive discovery materials including the specific identities of 'dozens of minor girls' and 'employees' mentioned in the indictment, flight logs ('use of Mr. Epstein's planes'), massage schedules, and visitor logs. The defense also requests 'Brady material' (exculpatory evidence), specifically seeking evidence to support defenses that Epstein believed victims were over 18, that victims deceived him about their age, and that payments were gifts rather than for sex acts.
EFTA00014649.pdf
A digital calendar entry for November 21, 2021, serving as a reminder for a legal filing deadline related to Government Exhibit 52 (GX 52) in a court case (likely US v. Maxwell). The entry quotes a court order requiring the Government to reply to a defense argument that a specific witness ('Employee-1') cannot authenticate the exhibit because a former employee (name redacted) allegedly removed the document from Epstein's property previously.
DOJ-OGR-00008270.jpg
This legal document is a filing arguing against the government's attempt to admit 'Exhibit 52' as evidence in a trial involving Ms. Maxwell. The author contends that the government has failed to authenticate the exhibit, has abandoned its original premise that it was Ms. Maxwell's book, and that admitting it at this late stage would be unfair. The argument is bolstered by the government's decision not to call a key witness, 'Employee-1', who was supposed to link the exhibit to Ms. Maxwell.
DOJ-OGR-00000266.jpg
This document, a page from a legal filing dated July 2, 2019, details "Overt Acts" committed in furtherance of a conspiracy involving commercial sex acts. It describes how JEFFREY EPSTEIN, the defendant, enticed and recruited multiple minor victims (Minor Victim-1, Minor Victim-2, Minor Victim-3) for sex acts at his residences in New York and Florida, paying them hundreds of dollars. The document also notes that EPSTEIN encouraged Minor Victim-1 to recruit other girls, and mentions an "Employee-1" acting on EPSTEIN's behalf.
DOJ-OGR-00000263.jpg
This document is page 6 of a court filing (likely the 2019 indictment) against Jeffrey Epstein. It details the operation of his sex trafficking network at his Palm Beach residence, describing how he traveled by private jet from New York and how specific employees (Employee-1, 2, and 3) facilitated the abuse by scheduling encounters and escorting victims. It explicitly describes the nature of the sexual acts and the 'massage' ruse used to victimize minors.
DOJ-OGR-00020694.jpg
This document is a court docket log from the SDNY case against Ghislaine Maxwell, dated November 19, 2021. It details orders by Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding a motion in limine to exclude evidence from 'Accuser-3' (Witness-3), ultimately ruling that testimony regarding Maxwell introducing the witness to Epstein and facilitating sexualized massages is admissible as evidence of Mann Act counts. It also mentions a letter from the prosecution team and procedural orders regarding the sealing and redaction of documents.
DOJ-OGR-00020551.jpg
This document is a page from a court docket in Case 22-1426, dated July 8, 2022, detailing several filings from November 19, 2021, related to the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The entries consist of letters and orders from Judge Alison J. Nathan concerning evidentiary matters, including the admissibility of Government Exhibit 52 and the anticipated testimony of a witness referred to as 'Accuser-3' and 'Witness-3'. The court orders address motions to exclude evidence and outline the process for redacting sensitive information, with a key focus on testimony about Maxwell's relationship with Mr. Epstein and her alleged role in facilitating sexual activity.
DOJ-OGR-00020450.jpg
This document is a log of court filings from November 19, 2021, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, presided over by Judge Alison J. Nathan. The entries detail orders and a memorandum opinion concerning evidentiary motions, specifically the admissibility of Government Exhibit 52 and the testimony of a witness referred to as 'Accuser-3' and 'Witness-3'. The court is ruling on what testimony from this witness regarding her relationship with Maxwell and Mr. Epstein will be permissible, setting deadlines for the parties to propose redactions to court documents.
DOJ-OGR-00005823.jpg
This document is page 40 of a legal filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) from October 29, 2021, arguing for the admissibility of testimony from 'Employee-1'. The text details that Employee-1 will testify that in October 2005, Epstein and a supervisor ordered the removal of computers and contact books from the house. The government argues this testimony proves the defendant's role in the conspiracy, knowledge of the abuse of underage girls, and authenticates exhibits.
DOJ-OGR-00005819.jpg
This legal document is a filing by the Government in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, arguing for the admissibility of specific evidence and witness testimony at an upcoming trial. The Government contends that exhibits and the testimony of "Employee-1," a former employee of Jeffrey Epstein, constitute direct evidence of the offenses charged and should be admitted, citing an October 11, 2021 letter where this evidence was disclosed to the defense.
Scheduling appointment
Scheduling appointment for Minor Victim-1 to engage in paid sex acts with Epstein.
Requesting specific girls
Asking recruiters to bring a specific minor girl for Epstein.
No Subject
Scheduling appointment for sex acts with Epstein.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity